And I didn't say ANYTHING about him until long after the tragedy unfolded and after I educated myself as to what was known about him.
But, I'm not surprised that you don't appreciate any of that. Since you're such a staunch conservative and all.
Nice try, trace. Fail.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/09/us...oter.html?_r=1Starting to sound like another crazy anti-choice murderer.Don Coorough, 58, who sat two desks in front of Mr. Loughner in a poetry class last semester, described him as a “troubled young man” and “emotionally underdeveloped.” After another student read a poem about getting an abortion, Mr. Loughner compared the young woman to a “terrorist for killing the baby.”
The high-capacity magazine of the semiautomatic pistol used in the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and more than a dozen other people on Saturday would have been illegal to manufacture and difficult to purchase under the Clinton-era assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004.
According to police and media reports, the alleged shooter, Jared Lee Loughner, legally purchased a semiautomatic Glock 19 with a high-capacity magazine in November at a gun store in Tucson. Under the assault weapons ban, it was illegal to manufacture or sell new high-capacity magazines, defined as those that hold more than 10 rounds. The magazines used by Loughner had 31 rounds each, according to police.
One classmate says this, so that makes it so? If the Sun asked me about you for some reason, and I said you were a nasty SOB, would that make it true? Um... gee, painted myself in a corner there...
It might not happen depending on the make up of the House but that's only if they suddenly grow a set and push that back.
In the face of this tragedy "liberals" will seek to limit our rights. It's their go to solution to every problem.
remember when akbar murdered all those peoplle and the left wing press wanted to be so careful not to draw any comparisons between Islam and akbar......welll
You're probably the same type of moron who believes that the U.S. is partly to blame for 9/11 because of its Middle East foreign policy.
Add "self righteous" and "condescending know-it-all" and that would describe just about every left wing jerk off I have ever met.
Your solution to that is toning down the rhetoric (only the right I'm sure) thus thus limiting free speech. We don't want to "push them" towards violence. It's not the shooters fault. He was pushed to it by evil vitriol and was just a sick person.
How do you propose to do that? Do you have an enforcement mechanism in mind?
FCC? Criminal charges? Civil suits?
I think your "first rate idiot" comment is incendiary in nature. Tone down the rhetoric pal.
I hope you don't "push" Trace towards violence.
See how this crap works now?
|Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278