Most Playoff Appearances since 2000

[bt12483]

LOL. You're funny.

And correct.

(You should have made the title of this thread "The Most Squandered Opportunities Since 2000". The Ravens would top the list. At least the Colts have won more than their share of division championships, have been to 2 super bowls, and are at least an elite team on offense. They overcame mind boggling injuries in 2010 to win their division. And the list goes on and on. The Ravens...not so much.)

No one has failed more than the Colts. 10 shots. 1 ring.

7 first round losses. 4 at home.

A QB with a losing playoff record. 9-10.

Brady is 14-4.

9-10 vs. 14-4.

Failure.

A division championship is a failure without a SB to match it.

More embarrassing to lose as the #1 seed than a wildcard. Colts should know - they have done it the most of anyone.

[OriginalColtsFan]

Is there an award for most 1st round playoff losses?

Is there an award for utter stupidity?

[OriginalColtsFan]

And correct.

No one has failed more than the Colts. 10 shots. 1 ring.

7 first round losses. 4 at home.

A QB with a losing playoff record. 9-10.

Brady is 14-4.

9-10 vs. 14-4.

Failure.

The Ravens didn't even get close enough to be in the running. Thanks for playing.

[bt12483]

Is there an award for utter stupidity?

Is that what one says when they have no other recourse for the facts that show no one has failed more than the Colts to win SB's?

[bt12483]

The Ravens didn't even get close enough to be in the running. Thanks for playing.

Huh?

They got closer than the Colts did this year. After another Manning 1st round exit at home.

[PurpleCat]

Indy 10 - 1 SB
Philly 9
NE 8 - 3 SB
Pitt 7 - 2 SB
Balt 7 - 1 SB
Packers 7
Giants 6 - 1 SB
Seattle 6
Jets 6
Bucs 5 - 1 SB

It appears we have a solid football franchise in Baltimore. But I already knew that as opposed to some around here.

[Crean N Crimson]

WOAH WOAH WOAH... So you're telling me the Ravens have been to the playoffs in 7 of the last 10 years, including 3 years straight?

That is so surprising considering this is the worst coaching staff in the history of the league who has no idea how to play the game or communicate. I am shocked!

[OriginalColtsFan]

Is that what one says when they have no other recourse for the facts that show no one has failed more than the Colts to win SB's?

Actually...that award would probably go to the Buffalo Bills. But again...your incessant need to focus on other team's issues, as if that somehow makes your own team better, is absurd. Quite common. But absurd, nonetheless. And if you think that's what I've done, in reverse, show me one post of mine in which I've ever compared the Colts to the Ravens in order to make the Colts look better? The Colts are the Colts; the Ravens are the Ravens. Each team has its strengths and weaknesses. I've never said Polian is the greatest; I've never said Peyton hasn't made mistakes; and I've never played one team off against the other. What I HAVE said is that the Ravens have not beaten the Colts in 8 years. And until they do, the Colts own the Ravens. Other than that, it's basically irrelevant. Like most of what you post. You seem to think that your cherry picked stats prove something, and that it's everyone else's responsibility to accept your nonsense and waste time disproving your nonsense. That's clearly not the case.

[bt12483]

Actually...that award would probably go to the Buffalo Bills. But again...your incessant need to focus on other team's issues, as if that somehow makes your own team better, is absurd. Quite common. But absurd, nonetheless. And if you think that's what I've done, in reverse, show me one post of mine in which I've ever compared the Colts to the Ravens in order to make the Colts look better? The Colts are the Colts; the Ravens are the Ravens. Each team has its strengths and weaknesses. I've never said Polian is the greatest; I've never said Peyton hasn't made mistakes; and I've never played one team off against the other. What I HAVE said is that the Ravens have not beaten the Colts in 8 years. And until they do, the Colts own the Ravens. Other than that, it's basically irrelevant. Like most of what you post. You seem to think that your cherry picked stats prove something, and that it's everyone else's responsibility to accept your nonsense and waste time disproving your nonsense. That's clearly not the case.

What stats did I cherry pick? I listed the stats as they are from 2000 onward.

Amazing that you are trying to bash me for focusing on some other team when I am not the guy on some OTHER TEAM's messageboard talking trash. Oh the hypocrisy.

Facts are Peyton Manning has a losing playoff record, has lost 7/10 times in the first round, 4 at home, and has as many rings as Brad Johnson and Trent Dilfer. He has had more chances to win a SB than anyone else and only has 1 in 10 tries.

I don't care if Manning is 80-0 against the Ravens - he is 1/10 in SB tries. SB is all that matters, and Manning has failed 90% of the time.

Dem's da facts.

[OriginalColtsFan]

What stats did I cherry pick? I listed the stats as they are from 2000 onward.

Amazing that you are trying to bash me for focusing on some other team when I am not the guy on some OTHER TEAM's messageboard talking trash. Oh the hypocrisy.

Facts are Peyton Manning has losing playoff record, has lost 7/10 times in the first round, 4 at home, and has as many rings as Brad Johnson and Trent Dilfer. He has had more chances to win a SB than anyone else and only has 1 in 10 tries.

I don't care if Manning is 80-0 against the Ravens - he is 1/10 in SB tries. SB is all that matters, and Manning has failed 90% of the time.

Great. Does that make you feel better?

Done.

[acisking]

LOL. You're funny.

(You should have made the title of this thread "The Most Squandered Opportunities Since 2000". The Ravens would top the list. At least the Colts have won more than their share of division championships, have been to 2 super bowls, and are at least an elite team on offense. They overcame mind boggling injuries in 2010 to win their division. And the list goes on and on. The Ravens...not so much.)

The point of your argument about the Ravens may be true but it is ironic coming from a Colts fan. Frankly not even the Ravens have squandered more opportunities than the Colts have. Yes they won in a Superbowl in 2006, but so did Baltimore in 2000. At least the Ravens weren't favored to win it all nearly every postseason only to choke. The Colts will be remembered as the regular season champions of the 2000s and nothing more.

[SPRavensFan]

FormerRavensFan aka OriginalColtsFan I don't know why you are ragging on the Ravens playoff fortunes, the Colts have gone one-and-done numerous times, and a lot of those losses have come inside the "friendly confines" of the RCA or Lucas Oil dome.

[bt12483]

Colts are failures too.

7/10 first round exits. 4 losses at home. Hell of a pattern. Repeated again this year. Embarrassing. How many #1 seedings were wasted by those one and done efforts??

Might as well not even go to the playoffs if you lose in the 1st round 70% of the time. Just a tease.

Manning could very well be the worst playoff QB in history. No one has had more chances to win a SB than him, and he only has 1. He has a LOSING 9-10 playoff record.

Anyone remember when OriginalColtsFan was a troll/hater?

Now he is the Ravens #1 fan. You can't make this stuff up.

Oh, and let's update those Manning stats:
9-11 playoff record. Tied for most losses with Favre.

8/12 times "one and done".

Another #1 seed wasted by Manning.

[bt12483]

Actually...that award would probably go to the Buffalo Bills. But again...your incessant need to focus on other team's issues, as if that somehow makes your own team better, is absurd. Quite common. But absurd, nonetheless. And if you think that's what I've done, in reverse, show me one post of mine in which I've ever compared the Colts to the Ravens in order to make the Colts look better? The Colts are the Colts; the Ravens are the Ravens. Each team has its strengths and weaknesses. I've never said Polian is the greatest; I've never said Peyton hasn't made mistakes; and I've never played one team off against the other. What I HAVE said is that the Ravens have not beaten the Colts in 8 years. And until they do, the Colts own the Ravens. Other than that, it's basically irrelevant. Like most of what you post. You seem to think that your cherry picked stats prove something, and that it's everyone else's responsibility to accept your nonsense and waste time disproving your nonsense. That's clearly not the case.

Well this year we beat the Colts and Manning.

And you've somehow transformed from a troll into a "fan". Which I find amazing.

[Fang]

Most Superbowl Appearances since 2000:
NE - 4 (3/1)
Giants - 2 (1/1)
Pitt - 2 (2/0)
Indy - 2 (1/1)

NE - 5 (3/2)
Giants - 3 (2/1)
Pitt - 3 (2/1)
Indy - 2 (1/1)

Aren't these the correct #'s?

[LarryN]

NE - 5 (3/2)
Giants - 3 (2/1)
Pitt - 3 (2/1)
Indy - 2 (1/1)

Aren't these the correct #'s?

This thread was started two years ago. Someone decided to start trolling old threads.

[bmore_ken]

It was a troll that bumped it up. He bumped up another old thread also

[bt12483]

NE - 5 (3/2)
Giants - 3 (2/1)
Pitt - 3 (2/1)
Indy - 2 (1/1)

Aren't these the correct #'s?

Now they are.

And I am hoping to soon be able to put the Ravens on the list as:

Ravens - 2 (2/0)

[Fang]

It was a troll that bumped it up. He bumped up another old thread also

Thanks. Never understood why some people bring year old threads back. Sounds like the term "troll" does apply.

[bt12483]

Thanks. Never understood why some people bring year old threads back. Sounds like the term "troll" does apply.

Because it is now relevant again.

The Ravens have been to the playoffs 5 straight years, fighting for a shot at another SB. Manning has again been eliminated in "one and done" fashion - by our Ravens.

Only people that should be embarrassed of what they previously said should have an issue.