Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Senate Republicans Filibuster Buffett Rule

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    R'lyeh
    Posts
    34,654

    Default Senate Republicans Filibuster Buffett Rule

    http://thinkprogress.org/economy/201...-buffett-rule/
    The Buffett Rule, a bill backed by President Obama that would ensure millionaires pay a comparable tax rate to middle-class Americans, fell to a Republican filibuster in the Senate this evening, despite a new poll showing it to be overwhelmingly popular. While the rule, named after billionaire investor Warren Buffett, earned a majority vote of 51-45, it didn’t get the 60 votes needed to overcome a GOP filibuster. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) was the only Republican to vote yes, while one Democrat, Mark Pryor (AR), voted no. Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) did not vote, but put out a statement opposing the bill. The vote is no surprise as Republicans vowed to block it, but Democrats wanted to put the GOP on the record as yet again filibustering to preserve lower tax rates for the wealthy. A CNN poll released today found that 72 percent of Americans — including 53 percent of Republicans and almost 70 percent of independents — support the Buffett Rule.
    I didn't really have my hopes up, but at least it shows where everyone stands.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whoville
    Posts
    22,598

    Default

    yep, the libs are all about symbolism this go round since they have no substance to run on ......

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    6,639

    Question

    Why does Obama hate small businesses that file individual tax returns anyway?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    16,281

    Default

    WHat's the composition of the Senate...isn't it 51 Democrats 47 Republicans and 2 Independants? If its so popular with some Republicans and Independants how come they couldn't get 9 votes?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Baltimore md
    Posts
    13,067

    Default

    It's a card played deftly by Obama in a election year.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    R'lyeh
    Posts
    34,654

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SalisburySage View Post
    WHat's the composition of the Senate...isn't it 51 Democrats 47 Republicans and 2 Independants? If its so popular with some Republicans and Independants how come they couldn't get 9 votes?
    Because Republicans tend to vote in lockstep, and are nearly unanimous in their hatred of America.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    In the nightmares of evildoers everywhere
    Posts
    19,581

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Calamari View Post
    Because Republicans tend to vote in lockstep, and are nearly unanimous in their hatred of America.
    How did the Democrats vote again?

    ROTFLMAO

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Woodstock, Md.
    Posts
    2,648

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diego View Post
    How did the Democrats vote again?

    ROTFLMAO
    BOL @ the leftwingers that are so caught up in their "We All Is Trayvon" mentality that they refuse to see the obvious: Americans everywhere -- including Congress -- are tired of that failed affirmative action hire, Barry Obama, and intend to send that America-hating racist and his angry, bitter wife back to inner city Chicago next January.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,432

    Default

    The Buffett Rule, a bill backed by President Obama that would ensure millionaires pay a comparable tax rate to middle-class Americans
    I haven't really been following this. Can someone tell me how this would work? It's one thing to say millionaires will pay the same, but I'm interested in the how. Does Congress want to eliminate certain deductions?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    I haven't really been following this. Can someone tell me how this would work? It's one thing to say millionaires will pay the same, but I'm interested in the how. Does Congress want to eliminate certain deductions?
    It would raise tax rates for millionaires to around 30%. Not much different than the rates under Reagan and Clinton. It would also affect Capital Gains taxes.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    6,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rurdy View Post
    Why does Obama hate small businesses that file individual tax returns anyway?
    Because they don't donate to his campaign...for the most part.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rurdy View Post
    Why does Obama hate small businesses that file individual tax returns anyway?
    Small businesses like Pepsi and Boeing?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,432

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    It would raise tax rates for millionaires to around 30%. Not much different than the rates under Reagan and Clinton. It would also affect Capital Gains taxes.
    A simple tax increase? No suprise the Republicans are against this.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Near Flint
    Posts
    5,375

    Default

    It's really closing a loophole- one that allows someone like Willard to have an effective tax rate of about 15% on income of over $20 million.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    None of your business
    Posts
    6,324

    Default

    It is estimated that this election year gimmick would bring in about $47 billion over ten years. The government will post of budget deficit of $1.2 trillion this year alone.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    6,639

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Small businesses like Pepsi and Boeing?
    Go figure, I would have thought that they don't use a 1040 form.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,616

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Calamari View Post
    Because Republicans tend to vote in lockstep, and are nearly unanimous in their hatred of America.
    And the dems aren't in lockstep. LOL!!!!

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Kent Island
    Posts
    5,034

    Default

    Brilliant plan Obama! Lets start a little class warfare over a meaningless bill to keep the attention from the failed policies of your short lived presidency.

    When Obama owned both houses he could have passed any legislation he wanted. It's too late to pretend that he has a plan now. If he had a plan to begin with there was nothing to stop him from putting it into place from the start. Romney will stomp Obama and he won't even have to try real hard.

    Jimmy Carter had a 14% lead at this point and had his rear end handed to him. Obama is down 2 points. This will be an embarrassing election for the left.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rurdy View Post
    Go figure, I would have thought that they don't use a 1040 form.
    Any business that clears over 1 million dollars in net income isn't small. Also, some billion dollar corporations file as S-corps.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Harford County, MD
    Posts
    10,959

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    I haven't really been following this. Can someone tell me how this would work? It's one thing to say millionaires will pay the same, but I'm interested in the how. Does Congress want to eliminate certain deductions?
    As I understand it for people making over a million dollars they would see a nominal rate increase (1-2%) they would have less deductions and credits availible to them. If a biollionare CEO gets a free apartment that would be taxable income under the rule.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278