Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 56

Thread: Mark Reynolds...... .136 average...... ouch!

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Posts
    68,944

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by atomic View Post
    I just got banned from Orioles Hangout for talking bad about reynolds. But he is the worst fielding third baseman I have ever seen and is an awful hitter. Why do we have him on the team again?
    I'm sure there's more to it that that.

    Anyway. Reynolds will heat up. He hit pretty well last year and was a huge power source for us. Plus, he's not that old.

    TM

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    17,378

    Default

    He's not that old but he's also not that good. Bad fielder and a strikeout machine.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    6,085

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob View Post
    .136 average
    3 errors
    0 homers
    20 k's in 44 at-bats

    Thank God we gift wrapped third base for him this offseason.
    6-48 .125 with 22K's after today's game......but at least he didn't make an error....

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Posts
    68,944

    Default

    It's April. Not worried at all.

    And besides, we have a winning record still. Just think when he heats up the Orioles will really be cookin'!

    TM

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    182

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TravisMoon View Post
    I'm sure there's more to it that that.

    Anyway. Reynolds will heat up. He hit pretty well last year and was a huge power source for us. Plus, he's not that old.

    TM
    His defense is terrible. And it never warms up

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob View Post
    He's not that old but he's also not that good. Bad fielder and a strikeout machine.
    I don't mind the Ks when he's swinging and missing at stuff in the zone. It's when he swings and misses at balls well off the plate that I get annoyed. He's been doing that a little more of late, perhaps expanding the zone in an effort to make contact. That's not his game, he's bad enough hitting balls in the zone let alone 1 foot off the plate.

    Ultimately though, if he can do what he did last year, I'll take it.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mythoughts View Post
    JJ Hardy 10 for 56 .179
    Mark Reynolds 6 for 44 .136
    Nick Johnson 0 for 23 .000
    Wilson Betemit 6 for 35 .171
    Endy Chavez 3 for 24 .125

    combined 25 for 182 .137
    Hardy and Reynolds will hit better than that and those two are taking walks so at least their OBPs are both roughly 100 points highers than their BAs. The other 3, yeah they suck although Chavez has been good in LF.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    17,378

    Default

    Here's Reynolds comparison to this time last year:

    2012
    .125 avg
    6 for 48
    4 doubles
    0 homeruns
    3 rbi
    8 walks
    22 strikeouts
    .250 obp
    .208 slg
    .458 ops

    2011
    .224 avg
    11 for 49
    5 doubles
    1 homerun
    10 rbi
    5 walks
    15 strikeouts
    .304 obp
    .388 slg
    .692 ops

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Posts
    68,944

    Default

    Looks like he got off to a slow start too last year. Again. I'm not worried.

    TM

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,502

    Default

    It could simply be a slow start (although clearly worse than last years slow start) or it could be an early indicator of a season that won't measure up to last years. It's a little early to say either way. He's currently sure is not doing much to help the team though.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob View Post
    Here's Reynolds comparison to this time last year:

    2012
    .125 avg
    6 for 48
    4 doubles
    0 homeruns
    3 rbi
    8 walks
    22 strikeouts
    .250 obp
    .208 slg
    .458 ops

    2011
    .224 avg
    11 for 49
    5 doubles
    1 homerun
    10 rbi
    5 walks
    15 strikeouts
    .304 obp
    .388 slg
    .692 ops
    Ouch....there is a certain pattern there for sure.

    He is basically a discount Dave Kingman rt now. And yet....given his current 'hitting' skill.....he is more like a discount Dave Conception. (and shoot.....at least even Conception could fall back on his great glove.)

  12. #32
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    Ouch....there is a certain pattern there for sure.

    He is basically a discount Dave Kingman rt now. And yet....given his current 'hitting' skill.....he is more like a discount Dave Conception. (and shoot.....at least even Conception could fall back on his great glove.)

    Believe it or not, through age 27, Mark Reynolds compares more favorably with Dean Palmer, Mike Schmidt and Matt Williams than he does Dave Kingman.

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/pl...eynoma01.shtml
    http://www.baseball-reference.com/pl...chmimi01.shtml

    Once again, proving that extrapolating from a small sample size (5 seasons for Reynolds) is ridiculous.






    And BTW....it Concepcion

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    4,967

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    Ouch....there is a certain pattern there for sure.

    He is basically a discount Dave Kingman rt now. And yet....given his current 'hitting' skill.....he is more like a discount Dave Conception. (and shoot.....at least even Conception could fall back on his great glove.)
    Who is Dave Conception?!?! Is that a porn star of some kind?

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,106

    Default

    I think I saw one of his flicks

  15. #35
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Costanza 831 View Post
    Who is Dave Conception?!?! Is that a porn star of some kind?

    Perhaps he starred with Jim Pinkett, Wayne Boggs and Jim Harbaugh's 'little bro'.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    398

    Default

    Reynolds is a DH who can fill in at 3rd and 1st. He’ll hit 30+ home runs, strike out 200+ times and get 75+ walks. There’s nothing wrong with a career .808 OPS. If used correctly, DH , once a week at 3rd and 1st he could be bonus to the team.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,048

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Costanza 831 View Post
    Who is Dave Conception?!?! Is that a porn star of some kind?
    his wife is referred to as Miss Conception

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oriole Dave View Post
    Reynolds is a DH who can fill in at 3rd and 1st. He’ll hit 30+ home runs, strike out 200+ times and get 75+ walks. There’s nothing wrong with a career .808 OPS. If used correctly, DH , once a week at 3rd and 1st he could be bonus to the team.
    I prefer Reynolds not to play 3rd at all.

    I do like your plan though.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,895

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by durango46 View Post
    I prefer Reynolds not to play 3rd at all.

    I do like your plan though.
    I agree. He has shown enough to force the Orioles to look for better defensive alternatives at third.He seems very uncomfortable out there and seems to be forcing his throws, etc. I don't mind if he plays first every once and awhile, but the only way I'd justify him playing 3rd is if he would get his batting average above .280 and provide the about the same power numbers he has in the past. Otherwise, it's DH mostly, and first base occasionally. Trading him seems unlikely because of his salary and lack of performance thus far.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,048

    Default

    Betemit should be penciled in at 3B. he saved that game in the Chicago series with a tough pick and split second throw that Reynolds would never have made. the guy is not a good infielder. I don't even want to see him at 1B. there's just no reason to put someone with hands of stone at a defensive position when your DH slot is open for him. Betemit and Davis should be the corner infielders.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278