Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 56 of 56

Thread: Mark Reynolds...... .136 average...... ouch!

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    baltimore
    Posts
    775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    Betemit should be penciled in at 3B. he saved that game in the Chicago series with a tough pick and split second throw that Reynolds would never have made. the guy is not a good infielder. I don't even want to see him at 1B. there's just no reason to put someone with hands of stone at a defensive position when your DH slot is open for him. Betemit and Davis should be the corner infielders.
    Sounds like a plan!

    At this point, we can only hope Reynolds gets hot and generates trade potential. He's hopefully gone after this year anyway to make room for the youngins. Too bad, if the guy had performed well in '12, the O's could have picked up his '13 option giving the Machado/Schoop/Townsend class a Norfolk stint to start next season. Instead, Betemit will probably start next year at third before he's platooned in mid season with Waring, Schoop or maybe replaced by Hardy to make room for Manny at short.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ravenation
    Posts
    19,861

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    Ouch....there is a certain pattern there for sure.

    He is basically a discount Dave Kingman rt now. And yet....given his current 'hitting' skill.....he is more like a discount Dave Conception. (and shoot.....at least even Conception could fall back on his great glove.)
    Reynolds is no Dave Concepcion !
    Nor will he ever be !
    The comparison is laughable and shows your tremedous ignorance about baseball !

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    398

    Default

    Even good MLB teams stick DH types in the field. Its magnified by the Orioles because of their overall incompetence. Reynolds at 3rd and 1st once a week with most of at bats coming at DH isn’t a bad idea. The problem is they have a LF’er playing CF, a SS playing second base and LF’er who specializes in making boneheaded plays. If they had decent league average defenders/hitters a Reynolds/Davis DH'ing occasional 1st and 3rd platoon would work.
    Last edited by Oriole Dave; 04-23-2012 at 04:22 PM.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,436

    Default

    These threads about Reynolds, Johnson and Betemit are hilarious. I thought the combination brought by this dynamic trio were the reasons why the O's considered Hall of Famer Vlad (with the O's highest batting average) to be expendable. The ability of many not to see the obvious is amazing.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    398

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hector View Post
    These threads about Reynolds, Johnson and Betemit are hilarious. I thought the combination brought by this dynamic trio were the reasons why the O's considered Hall of Famer Vlad (with the O's highest batting average) to be expendable. The ability of many not to see the obvious is amazing.
    So your point is that if Vlad was here the trio of DH’s on the roster Reynolds/Davis/Reimold would have to be in field every game

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hector View Post
    These threads about Reynolds, Johnson and Betemit are hilarious. I thought the combination brought by this dynamic trio were the reasons why the O's considered Hall of Famer Vlad (with the O's highest batting average) to be expendable. The ability of many not to see the obvious is amazing.
    dude, give it a rest

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Where the Beach "Is a way of Life"
    Posts
    23,317

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hector View Post
    These threads about Reynolds, Johnson and Betemit are hilarious. I thought the combination brought by this dynamic trio were the reasons why the O's considered Hall of Famer Vlad (with the O's highest batting average) to be expendable. The ability of many not to see the obvious is amazing.
    The obvious my friend is that if you don't have the likes of "Big Papi" as your DH then the last type of player that you want as a DH is one that can't play the field. That is why Vlad is out of a job! This is not rocket science.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,436

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oriole Dave View Post
    So your point is that if Vlad was here the trio of DH’s on the roster Reynolds/Davis/Reimold would have to be in field every game
    I hadn't mentioned davis or Reimold in my post. Davis is fine at 1B since there's nobody else nearly as capable on the roster. Same for Reimold - now that Pie is gone, Reimold gets his opportunity and is delivering.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,436

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Byng View Post
    The obvious my friend is that if you don't have the likes of "Big Papi" as your DH then the last type of player that you want as a DH is one that can't play the field. That is why Vlad is out of a job! This is not rocket science.
    Apparently simple logic is "rocket science" to you. In your mind, if it's not a "Big Papi" type, then you don't want any DH who doesn't play in the field. I assume that means you're fine with the Reynolds, Johnson, Betemit combo at bat and in the field.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Where the Beach "Is a way of Life"
    Posts
    23,317

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hector View Post
    Apparently simple logic is "rocket science" to you. In your mind, if it's not a "Big Papi" type, then you don't want any DH who doesn't play in the field. I assume that means you're fine with the Reynolds, Johnson, Betemit combo at bat and in the field.
    Yes, absolutely. Reynolds hit 37 home runs last year and is very serviceable at 1st. base, who wouldn't want that flexibility apart from you? You have noticed that just about no poster agrees with you, or haven't you?

  11. #51
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,562

    Default

    Last year Reynolds had a higher OBP, SLG, and OPS then Vlad. But oh, Vlad had a higher BA, big wow like that matters at all.

    Reynolds:
    .221/.323/.483/.806

    Guerrero
    .290/.317/.416/.733

  12. #52
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,436

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Byng View Post
    Yes, absolutely. Reynolds hit 37 home runs last year and is very serviceable at 1st. base, who wouldn't want that flexibility apart from you? You have noticed that just about no poster agrees with you, or haven't you?
    Indeed I have noticed. I take solace knowing that I've made my fortune not following the crowd.

  13. #53
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,436

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Jazz View Post
    Last year Reynolds had a higher OBP, SLG, and OPS then Vlad. But oh, Vlad had a higher BA, big wow like that matters at all.

    Reynolds:
    .221/.323/.483/.806

    Guerrero
    .290/.317/.416/.733
    I accept the fact that you're a big Reynolds supporter and you're certainly entitled to that view. Try comparing Reynolds of THIS YEAR to Vlad from last year. Hopefully you're right that Reynolds will revert to a .200 BA, 200 strikeouts, 30 homers and about 70 RBI's so the O's will have the Reynolds that you think is just fine.

    I'll grant you one indisputable fact though - Reynolds is better than the other Vlad substitute, Nick J.

  14. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ravenation
    Posts
    19,861

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hector View Post
    These threads about Reynolds, Johnson and Betemit are hilarious. I thought the combination brought by this dynamic trio were the reasons why the O's considered Hall of Famer Vlad (with the O's highest batting average) to be expendable. The ability of many not to see the obvious is amazing.
    What made Vlad expendable was the fact that he was a waste of a uniform.

    IMO, the O's lost at least 6-8 games simply because Buck wouldn't move Vlad down to the 6 or 7 hole.

  15. #55
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,562

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hector View Post
    I accept the fact that you're a big Reynolds supporter and you're certainly entitled to that view. Try comparing Reynolds of THIS YEAR to Vlad from last year. Hopefully you're right that Reynolds will revert to a .200 BA, 200 strikeouts, 30 homers and about 70 RBI's so the O's will have the Reynolds that you think is just fine.

    I'll grant you one indisputable fact though - Reynolds is better than the other Vlad substitute, Nick J.
    I'm not a 'big Reynolds supporter' and I never said anything is 'just fine'.

  16. #56
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    17,378

    Default

    Reynolds benched tonight as Buck "wants him to work on his swing".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278