Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Will the Royals lose 120 games ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ravenation
    Posts
    19,860

    Default Will the Royals lose 120 games ?

    The Royals are on pace to go 30-132.
    And looking at their roster I don't see them getting much better than their 3-13 start.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Austin, Tx
    Posts
    17,283

    Default

    I doubt it. They have too much talent at the plate.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,502

    Default

    Oh man, look at the score in some of these losses, I'd be pulling my hair out:
    1-0
    5-4
    11-9
    4-3
    3-2
    3-1
    4-3


    They are definitely better than 3-13. Those last 3 losses are games vs DET, holding that offense to 10 runs over 3 games, that's pretty damn respectable.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Olney, MD USA
    Posts
    2,791

    Default

    The Royals are a young team. They will come around. The Royals are no worse than the Orioles. Both will finish with similar records.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,567

    Default

    They are better than there record shows. The Orioles could just as easily have that same record. And I suspect that end of the day those two will in deed have similiar records. But of course if it comes down to who gets the #1 pick....the Orioles will be juuuuussst a little bit 'better.'....screwing themselves yet again.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    baltimore
    Posts
    775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    They are better than there record shows. The Orioles could just as easily have that same record. And I suspect that end of the day those two will in deed have similiar records. But of course if it comes down to who gets the #1 pick....the Orioles will be juuuuussst a little bit 'better.'....screwing themselves yet again.
    Neither will get the #1 pick. Once the early season anomalies go away and the season adjusts accordingly, the #1 pick will go to.....the Astros. Right Mr. Rocket Scientist? The O's will likely get their usual slot at #4 after the Royals and Twins.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    reisterstown md
    Posts
    9,074

    Default

    Many had the Royals as their surprise team but their young talent is pressing mightily. And yes when it's all said and done Hou,Min,Cubs and KC will be worse than us giving us the 5th pick.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    15,228

    Default

    eh...the Royals were overrated.
    They have some great talent, but I would hardly say their lineup is stacked with proven guys.
    Butler, Hosmer and Gordon are players, but who then?
    ok...Moustakas is decent (highly touted...) and Escobar is doing well. There are still 3 positions on the field.

    Plus, they don't really have much in the way of pitching - and that's what is really killing them.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    baltimore
    Posts
    775

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by AntiMoon View Post
    Many had the Royals as their surprise team but their young talent is pressing mightily. And yes when it's all said and done Hou,Min,Cubs and KC will be worse than us giving us the 5th pick.
    After further reflection, I could see the O's winning 70 games in '12 and still dropping all the way to eleventh after KC, MN, Oak, CLE, Sea, Mets, Pit, Cubs, Astros and Padres.

    There are some real have nots in the ML this year. It will be very difficult to perform poorly enough to get a top five draft position unless they change the rotation right away. Bergesen, Matusz, Willis, George and Tillman might be the solution if they allow Gregg to be closer. On second thought, they could probably just switch out Johnson for Gregg and he could deliver the team the #1 choice without making any other moves. That $5.8M might be of value after all if it delivers the #1 draft choice!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ravenation
    Posts
    19,860

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    They are better than there record shows. The Orioles could just as easily have that same record. And I suspect that end of the day those two will in deed have similiar records. But of course if it comes down to who gets the #1 pick....the Orioles will be juuuuussst a little bit 'better.'....screwing themselves yet again.
    The Royals are sure to lose at least 10 more games than the O's.
    Granted the O's are sure to lose at least 90, and probably closer to 95, but the Royals will certainly lose well over 100 games - I'll predict 115

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mythoughts View Post
    The Royals are sure to lose at least 10 more games than the O's.
    Granted the O's are sure to lose at least 90, and probably closer to 95, but the Royals will certainly lose well over 100 games - I'll predict 115
    Losing 100 games is hard to do, let alone losing 115. No way.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278