Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 39

Thread: Rogue cop should be terminated

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ravenation
    Posts
    19,861

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    A small planet in the vicinity of Betelgeuse
    Posts
    4,427

    Default

    To quote Ron White:

    "Next time you have a thought...let it pass."

    First off, just as with every other citizen in the City, a Police Officer is innocent until proven guilty. ALL CHARGES must be taken into a court of law.

    Secondly, I would not use the term "Rogue Cop" to describe a parent looking for his child. I would think that caring for a child would carrying a more positive name.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    250

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lawman 27 View Post
    To quote Ron White:

    "Next time you have a thought...let it pass."

    First off, just as with every other citizen in the City, a Police Officer is innocent until proven guilty. ALL CHARGES must be taken into a court of law.

    Secondly, I would not use the term "Rogue Cop" to describe a parent looking for his child. I would think that caring for a child would carrying a more positive name.
    He was looking for his Daughter for goodness sake. As a Police Officer, he did a little extra looking and he didn't hurt anyone in the process. Those of you that have children, most of us would do the same if it were our child. Give him a break. We put up with O'Malley for about 8 years and didn't put him in jail for bribery, supporting lawbreakers and stealing and mis-using State Tax dollars, abandoning Maryland to do the bidding of the Democratic Party and looking for votes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Towson
    Posts
    3,978

    Default

    If my child was missing I would do the same thing.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ravenation
    Posts
    19,861

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFinan View Post
    He was looking for his Daughter for goodness sake. As a Police Officer, he did a little extra looking and he didn't hurt anyone in the process. Those of you that have children, most of us would do the same if it were our child. Give him a break. We put up with O'Malley for about 8 years and didn't put him in jail for bribery, supporting lawbreakers and stealing and mis-using State Tax dollars, abandoning Maryland to do the bidding of the Democratic Party and looking for votes.
    So the law should be that anyone who is looking for the child can break into any house they want to and it's OK because they were looking for their child.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ravenation
    Posts
    19,861

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lawman 27 View Post
    To quote Ron White:

    "Next time you have a thought...let it pass."

    First off, just as with every other citizen in the City, a Police Officer is innocent until proven guilty. ALL CHARGES must be taken into a court of law.

    Secondly, I would not use the term "Rogue Cop" to describe a parent looking for his child. I would think that caring for a child would carrying a more positive name.
    So you wouldn't mind if I broke into your house and scared your wife and kids as long as I'm looking for my child ? As long as I say that everything is cool?
    This is exactly the kind of cops that need to be gotten rid of. And it's the definition of a rogue cop - one who wants to enforce laws but feels laws don't apply to them.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ravenation
    Posts
    19,861

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oriole-Bob View Post
    If my child was missing I would do the same thing.
    Your family matters don't give you the right to threaten my family in my house

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,415

    Default

    It sounds to me like this man's daughter is due for a good old fashioned arse whoopin'.

  9. #9
    crabsnbeer Guest

    Default

    If it was Bruce Willis is a movie he would be the hero.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9,751

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Candy Pickletoes View Post
    It sounds to me like this man's daughter is due for a good old fashioned arse whoopin'.
    I think you were reading my mind.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Sippicup, SC
    Posts
    6,891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Candy Pickletoes View Post
    It sounds to me like this man's daughter is due for a good old fashioned arse whoopin'.

    You mean like whipping her with a Coaxial cable kind of arse whoopin'
    Last edited by Mitchum; 04-25-2012 at 05:13 PM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    A world of His own creation
    Posts
    59,289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lawman 27 View Post
    To quote Ron White:

    "Next time you have a thought...let it pass."

    First off, just as with every other citizen in the City, a Police Officer is innocent until proven guilty. ALL CHARGES must be taken into a court of law.

    Secondly, I would not use the term "Rogue Cop" to describe a parent looking for his child. I would think that caring for a child would carrying a more positive name.
    My good Lawman I have one question. Why wouldn't he go through official channles just like everyone else with a missing child? That's part of his detail so he should know the great work that they do finding missing kids.

    If he flashed his badge to gain entrance to a home to conduct a warrantless search then yes "Rogue Cop" applies.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    15,579

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mitchum View Post
    You mean like whipping her with a Coaxial cable kind of arse whoopin'
    Exactly. For having a Facebook account "in violation of his rules."

    In the earlier case, from September, Nicholson was charged with second-degree assault, though the charges were later dropped on the condition that the family attend counseling.

    The report shows that according to the girl, Nicholson visited her school during second period and took her out of class, citing a "family emergency." He was angry that she had a Facebook account, and struck her multiple times on the buttocks and forearms with a coaxial cable, the girl said.

    A check of school records verified that she had been taken out of class early, police said. She said that on a second occasion, a male friend had called her on the house phone, and when Nicholson found out, she was again struck with the cord, according to the police report.
    Why was this man still on the force?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    50,858

    Default

    Yeah, he needs to go.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    A world of His own creation
    Posts
    59,289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octoburn View Post
    Exactly. For having a Facebook account "in violation of his rules."



    Why was this man still on the force?
    SA Bernstein obviously doesn't believe in protecting children from violence. Somebody has to go that's for damned sure!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,415

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mitchum View Post
    You mean like whipping her with a Coaxial cable kind of arse whoopin'
    Did you miss the part where I said "good old fashioned". How old fashioned is a Coaxial Cable?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,415

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octoburn View Post
    Exactly. For having a Facebook account "in violation of his rules."



    Why was this man still on the force?
    Why did you italicize "in voilation of his rules"? Is he not her father? Should he not set rules in his own home? If she breaks those rules should there not be consequences?

    I'm not agreeing with beating her with a cable, but I do believe in good old fashioned arse whoopin, laid over the knee and smacked on the hiney.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    21,373

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wizard777 View Post
    SA Bernstein obviously doesn't believe in protecting children from violence. Somebody has to go that's for damned sure!
    You really can't help yourself, can you? You have made your feelings about Jews very clear. No need to keep harping about it.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    24,182

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yuca View Post
    You really can't help yourself, can you? You have made your feelings about Jews very clear. No need to keep harping about it.
    ..No more than you've made your feelings about blacks very clear...

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Baltimore county
    Posts
    3,853

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshan Man View Post
    ..No more than you've made your feelings about blacks very clear...
    Reading my mind, shame on you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278