Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Democrat senator thinks that wind farms can save the USPS

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    10,751

    Default Democrat senator thinks that wind farms can save the USPS


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    24,817

    Default

    There you go again, making stuff up. Where in that video does he say this can "save the USPS"? I heard him say that the Postal Service is a good place to start using the clean energy of wind power.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    7,556

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by betamanlet View Post
    Do you have a job?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Salisbury, MD
    Posts
    3,887

    Default

    IMO the post office missed an opportunity in the early days of the internet. They could have become an ISP and offered all the services they offer now over their website.

    Carper's onto something with regard to powering the vehicles. They don't have to be gasoline powered.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    None of your business
    Posts
    6,324

    Default

    The guy seems like a bit of a goof. The USPS is going down the tubes. Where are they supposed to come up with the money to buy a fleet of new vehicles?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    11,452

    Default

    Let me ask you Leftistas something.

    Alternative or mixed fuel vehicles are more expensive than a gas engine. The cost of fuel is lowest with gas.

    So, how are we going to get the USPS cost neutral by increasing their cost?

    Of course, we could subsidize expensive fuel purchases by the USPS and pretend it is inexpensive, but that would just be another effort to move cost from one part of the government to another. You would have a more difficult time to see it, but it would still be there.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grggngll View Post
    Let me ask you Leftistas something.

    Alternative or mixed fuel vehicles are more expensive than a gas engine. The cost of fuel is lowest with gas.

    So, how are we going to get the USPS cost neutral by increasing their cost?

    Of course, we could subsidize expensive fuel purchases by the USPS and pretend it is inexpensive, but that would just be another effort to move cost from one part of the government to another. You would have a more difficult time to see it, but it would still be there.
    No the cost of fuel is lowest with a hybrid "mixed fuel" vehicle.

    While the initial price of hybrid cars might be between $2,000 to $10,000 more than a traditional fueled car, the ultimate savings make the purchase completely worth the investment. Hybrid cars run on both electric and traditional fuels, which require fewer stops to the fill station that will ultimately save you hundreds of dollars in costs.
    http://www.carsdirect.com/car-pricin...new-hybrid-car

    I drive both a hybrid and a traditonal car. No contest re fuel costs.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12

    Default

    I am sad to see the UPS failing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278