Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 41

Thread: Ravens draft grades

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    reisterstown md
    Posts
    9,074

    Default Ravens draft grades

    Pete Schager: Fox sports: A+
    Adam Schein: Fox sports/sirius NFL: A+
    Vinny Iyer Sporting News: A-
    Pete Prisco CBS sportsline: B+
    Chris Burke: SI.com: B
    John Czarnecki Fox Sports: B
    Mel Kiper: B
    Jeff Zrebiec: B
    Rob Rang: The Sports exchange: B-


    Locker combo guy "These guys are idiots and Ozzie slurpers. Ravens are hideous morons who will win 4 games"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Yet you'll still hear some Ravens fans complaining. At least maybe this will quiet them a little bit.

    And Locker Combo... well... he's Locker Combo...

    If the Ravens got an average grade of a B+ that MUST mean the Colts average is something like A+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Joppatowne
    Posts
    927

    Default

    How many of these people work for Bristol?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,420

    Default

    "I've been in a lot of draft rooms,'' Grigson said, "and I've seen people reach way down, into the bowels of the draft board, to fill a need position. Then, once they come in and get in pads and they start playing, you figure you really haven't solved the problem you needed to solve. So we targeted some [defensive] guys, but when we couldn't get them, we had players on our board we knew could help us, and help us now.

    "There are teams I've followed over the years and admired. Baltimore stays true to its principles and drafts smart. I've looked up to Ozzie Newsome, and he doesn't force things, even when I'm sure he feels the temptation to fill glaring needs. Instead of emotion getting in the way, he follows his board. Look where the Ravens are. They contend every year for the Super Bowl.
    -Ryan Grigson

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...mqb/index.html

    Looking forward to seeing Numbers' spin on this.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    672

    Default

    I give the Ravens a c+. Upshaw may play this year but his height concerns me. Word on the street is the reason he dropped was due to off the field issues. I think they thought they were getting kontz or the Lb from Nebraska and scrambled for their second pick. I don't like this guy. He is really soft. 3rd pick is pretty solid not sure he can play special teams but can spell Ray Rice and is good around the goal line. Never seen the 4th round guys play but it sounds like they are D1 players that left school to play more at d1AA. Maybe they will be Webb and flacco. ASA may make the practice squad or be a ST player. Good draft considering they did not have a 1st round pick but not sexy.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    reisterstown md
    Posts
    9,074

    Default

    DeCosta admitted alot of guys we liked got drafted just before we picked in almost the whole draft. Konz was there in 1st rd, we wanted him in the 2nd. Guys we loved in 1st rd hoping to fall were DeCastro,Hightower and Mercilus.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aclobat View Post
    How many of these people work for Bristol?
    Only ONE of them....and he is an unabashed and blatent Ravens homer who is getting phased out for a younger and more adept evaluator.

    The absence of anyone prominent from Bristol/NFLN on that list should tell you all you need to know about those grades' validity.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    Only ONE of them....and he is an unabashed and blatent Ravens homer who is getting phased out for a younger and more adept evaluator.

    The absence of anyone prominent from Bristol/NFLN on that list should tell you all you need to know about those grades' validity.
    Is Ryan Grigson a Ravens' homer? Or should we ignore him because he's not from Bristol/NFLN?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4,228

    Default

    If Sergio Kindle can become the player they thought he was that's Suggs, Kruger, Kindle and Upshaw as our pass rushers with Cody and Ngata plugging the middle. Then there's Webb, Smith and Williams in coverage. Did I forget anyone??? Oh yea, Ray and Ed!!!

    Scary.

    I'd hate to be an opposing QB. LOL.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,042

    Default

    Seriously, The Sun should just rename the Ravens forum to "Numbers" and the Orioles forum to "Moonsters"...

    Complain about the trolls, yet every third post from someone actually INVITES them to reply. Strange...

    I think the ultimate verdict on whether the draft was good or not will be in 2 or 3 years. If 2 or 3 of these guys are serious, positive contributors... it's a good draft. If 3 or 4 are, with one being in the all-pro discussion, it's a great draft. That's really what you need to make sure you get on a yearly basis, 2 to 4 guys who stick and become real "plus" guys with a lot of playing time. They don't ALL have to hit...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    reisterstown md
    Posts
    9,074

    Default

    It's always 2 different grades: the immediate grades are based on value: did you get a guy in the 2nd you could have drafted in the 5th? And vice versa. And did you "fill holes". 3 years from now all anybody will care about is how many good players did you get.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    -Ryan Grigson

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...mqb/index.html

    Looking forward to seeing Numbers' spin on this.
    LOL....Cletus, every team contends for the Super Bowl every year. However, the Ravens haven't even played in one in what 19 years.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Southern York County
    Posts
    7,053

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tru Dat View Post
    LOL....Cletus, every team contends for the Super Bowl every year. However, the Ravens haven't even played in one in what 19 years.
    Right. The Colts contended for a Super Bowl last season. Moron

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tru Dat View Post
    LOL....Cletus, every team contends for the Super Bowl every year. However, the Ravens haven't even played in one in what 19 years.
    Every team makes the playoffs each year? I think that is required to contend for the Super Bowl.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dandrews View Post
    Right. The Colts contended for a Super Bowl last season. Moron
    They actually did Cletus. So did the other 31 teams. They only difference in the Colts and Ravens were that the ravens were eliminated in the playoffs. Neither team contended for the Super Bowl in your view, right Cletus.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    Every team makes the playoffs each year? I think that is required to contend for the Super Bowl.
    LOL....what a narrow minded make my own rules twit.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New Mexico, Raven Country
    Posts
    15,699

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tru Dat View Post
    They actually did Cletus. So did the other 31 teams. They only difference in the Colts and Ravens were that the ravens were eliminated in the playoffs. Neither team contended for the Super Bowl in your view, right Cletus.
    I think you have been drinking too much of that anti freeze out of the General "Cletus".....
    You seriously need to lay off the cocaine..... If I goto the NFL's website and look up Playoffs from last year, I wont see the colts name in it all. You should just delete your account for posting the DUMBEST post ever, despite having the right too.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tru Dat View Post
    LOL....what a narrow minded make my own rules twit.
    In your mind, the Browns and the Redskins must have been serious contenders last year. I guess the Orioles are contenders every year in baseball.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    In your mind, the Browns and the Redskins must have been serious contenders last year. I guess the Orioles are contenders every year in baseball.
    No.....they are pretty much the exception to that rule....esp in that division.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    No.....they are pretty much the exception to that rule....esp in that division.
    The Browns haven't won a playoff game since 1994. And haven't been to the playoffs since 2002. Clearly contenders.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278