Amazing how every stormfront thread seems to end up here nearly verbatim.
Amazing how every stormfront thread seems to end up here nearly verbatim.
Calamari--
I don't normally peruse Stormfront, so I guess I'll have to take your word for it. Even the responses are basically the same?
Dieser Weg wird kein leichter sein; dieser Weg wird steinig und schwer.
Nicht mit vielen wirst du dir einig sein, doch dieses Leben bietet so viel mehr. --Xavier Naidoo
Calamari: Are you suggesting a zionist jew such as myself frequents stormfront?
Do you think those people look favorably upon people like me?
Intent and motive are commonly used to differentiate between severity of crimes and punishments.
The State has decided that in order to deter crimes motivated primarily or entirely because of racial, ethnic, or religious prejudice/bigotry; punishments for such crimes will be more severe.
Comparable statutes are found with respect to escalating punishments as the age of victims of certain crimes decreases. Is it fair to the adult victims of such crimes that the perpetrator of their assault has a maximum sentence much lower than if they (the victim) was under age 12?
Specific hate crime punishment is useless unless it is applied equally.
There are obviously protected areas, sexual orientation, race, religion, etc., no?
Either enforce it equally or it's worthless. Arguments that majority populations cannot be victimized by hate crimes renders hate crime legislation impotent.
Can't have it both ways.
If you have an expected level of unacceptable behavior, it must apply to everyone, regardless of whatever happened a hundred, two hundred or 1000 years ago. Giving somebody a pass for it makes the the intent of the law worthless.
But there are only a handful of those crimes, black on black crime is far more common, so wouldn't it make sense to try to further discourage black on black crime? I would think deterring the COMMOn crimes would be more important of a priority given how many more lives it takes, including even innocent bystanders.
I find it hard to believe it's worse to beat up a gay guy than to kill an innocent bystander in a drive by s hooting.
Who says majority populations can't be victimized. Wisconsin v. Mitchell.
Dieser Weg wird kein leichter sein; dieser Weg wird steinig und schwer.
Nicht mit vielen wirst du dir einig sein, doch dieses Leben bietet so viel mehr. --Xavier Naidoo
We've had multiple cases of what would think you would at least charge for a hate crime, where the authorities have refused to do so.
Remember my link last week of the Norfolk, VA beating where 30+ black teens attacked a white couple, even their newspaper buried the story for 2 weeks. No hate crime charges.
Dieser Weg wird kein leichter sein; dieser Weg wird steinig und schwer.
Nicht mit vielen wirst du dir einig sein, doch dieses Leben bietet so viel mehr. --Xavier Naidoo
http://wtop.com/109/2855431/Girl-10-...g-in-car-in-DC
Fortunatly this girl will recover, but what is more common, anti gay hate crimes or people getting shot by stray bullets from intraracial crime? What needs to be discouraged more?
Good Lord beta you still don't get it. This discussion is pretty much over because you can't see past your own tired and flat out wrong argument. Nothing more to see here
|
| Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv | Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278 |