Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 161 to 173 of 173

Thread: Wall Street Journal - "Obama spending binge never happened"

  1. #161
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    12,856

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balt Observer View Post
    Let's be real here - nothing that Obama is trying to pull out of his bag of tricks is working. The latest is this libbie nutter Nutting's contrived analysis. It's been thoroughly picked apart, and Obama's supporters, you included, are having a hissy fit as a result.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phineas Finn View Post
    You continue to play the same game -- over and over and over.

    You've got nothing but vague generalities and outright lies.

    Go away and let the grownups talk.

    Ol' BaltBob used to actually hold conversations.
    Now, he just spews trash talk, over and over and over.

    Too bad.

  2. #162
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,874

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    The author claims that the TARP should be excluded from the calculations. Well if you exclude TARP, you have to exclude the Stimulus.

    If you exclude the Stimulus, Obama still wins

    The only major spending added by Obama has been the Stimulus and the extension of the Bush tax cuts. Everything he's done so far has been temporary...
    TARP costs went to the Bush Administration and not Obama. Obama's fuzzy math is getting fuzzier. Bush was huge spender and Obama surpassed him by allot which is saying something.

  3. #163
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    5,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phineas Finn View Post
    You continue to play the same game -- over and over and over.

    You've got nothing but vague generalities and outright lies.

    Go away and let the grownups talk.
    I understand that the truth is a bitter pill to swallow sometimes, but that is no reason to shoot the messenger.

  4. #164
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,422

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RHB View Post
    TARP costs went to the Bush Administration and not Obama. Obama's fuzzy math is getting fuzzier. Bush was huge spender and Obama surpassed him by allot which is saying something.
    Bush added 5 trillion in spending. Obama added one trillion in spending.

  5. #165
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    5,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Bush added 5 trillion in spending. Obama added one trillion in spending.
    Wow, back to that debunked untruth again, huh?

  6. #166
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    21,398

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balt Observer View Post
    I understand that the truth is a bitter pill to swallow sometimes, but that is no reason to shoot the messenger.
    The hell there isn't.

  7. #167
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    5,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phineas Finn View Post
    The hell there isn't.
    So then, you aren't interested in hearing dissenting opinions, but just shooting them down.

    Not very democratic, is it?

  8. #168
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,874

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Bush added 5 trillion in spending. Obama added one trillion in spending.
    More fuzzy math. Are you talking about Bush's 8 years versus Obama's 2010 and 2011 years? We know Obama supporters do not count 2009 since this was Bush's budget. Speaking of which, when will the Dems adopt a budget?

  9. #169
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,422

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RHB View Post
    More fuzzy math. Are you talking about Bush's 8 years versus Obama's 2010 and 2011 years? We know Obama supporters do not count 2009 since this was Bush's budget. Speaking of which, when will the Dems adopt a budget?
    Obama hasn't added anything more than temporary stimulus spending. Bush added far more long-term stuff

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...OrYI_blog.html

  10. #170
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    5,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Obama hasn't added anything more than temporary stimulus spending. Bush added far more long-term stuff

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...OrYI_blog.html
    Hahaha - bringing up that fake graph again from the liberal partisan hack.

    So, so predictable.

  11. #171
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balt Observer View Post
    I understand that the truth is a bitter pill to swallow sometimes, but that is no reason to shoot the messenger.
    There are many internet sites that only produce false truths. So, in a matter of speaking, you could shoot the messenger if the messenger is one of those sites. Unfortunately, anybody can start a website these days for the mere purpose of spreading rumors, lies and innuendos. They can do so with little or no accountability and then people with agendas provide links to said site and tout is as gospel.

  12. #172
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    5,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NCBirdfan View Post
    There are many internet sites that only produce false truths. So, in a matter of speaking, you could shoot the messenger if the messenger is one of those sites. Unfortunately, anybody can start a website these days for the mere purpose of spreading rumors, lies and innuendos. They can do so with little or no accountability and then people with agendas provide links to said site and tout is as gospel.
    As it pertains to this thread, the original article written by Nutting has been discredited from multiple sources. Including from his own organization.

  13. #173
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balt Observer View Post
    As it pertains to this thread, the original article written by Nutting has been discredited from multiple sources. Including from his own organization.
    You are right. The Wall Street Journal has really dropped off in recent years. It used to be an award-winning paper with top-notched reporting in the financial fields. Has it won any awards since the editorial staff changed hands??

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278