Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: Stark: O's in thick of Garza sweepstakes

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    the NC sandhills
    Posts
    26,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Far from home View Post
    Nats made a great deal for them...Gio's been great.
    Sure. But at the time the deal was made, plenty of people panned the Nats for "giving up the farm" for him. Admittedly, that was my knee-jerk reaction initially as well.

    But you can't get something for nothing, ya know ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Far from home View Post
    Getting Angelos to make a smart aggressive deal like that will probably be pretty near impossible....
    Angelos would rather be right than have a winning baseball team. Which is why the O's are doomed as long as he owns them.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AntiMoon View Post
    Getting Thome is a classic O's move. . . if they do nothing else. They have a month remaining to show us these aren't the same old O's.
    Heck.....in about a month.....they aren't likely to even have Thome himself the way things are trending. They'll have to ship him off to an actual contender.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Southern York County
    Posts
    7,053

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AntiMoon View Post
    Getting Thome is a classic O's move. . . if they do nothing else. They have a month remaining to show us these aren't the same old O's.
    There's no doubt in my mind they'll acquire some pitching. Duquette even said today they plan on acquiring some arms. Now, the extent of how good that pitching is may be questionable.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    Sure. But at the time the deal was made, plenty of people panned the Nats for "giving up the farm" for him. Admittedly, that was my knee-jerk reaction initially as well.

    But you can't get something for nothing, ya know ?


    Angelos would rather be right than have a winning baseball team. Which is why the O's are doomed as long as he owns them.
    No, but you can get nothing for nothing
    see Orioles

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    15,241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    Sure. But at the time the deal was made, plenty of people panned the Nats for "giving up the farm" for him. Admittedly, that was my knee-jerk reaction initially as well.

    But you can't get something for nothing, ya know ?



    Angelos would rather be right than have a winning baseball team. Which is why the O's are doomed as long as he owns them.
    I'm not sure what we're debating here.

    My point earlier was the Garza does not equal Gio, then I agreed with Angelos not being willing to spend money...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278