Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 38 of 38

Thread: What is Weiters worth

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    Some of those are indeed better this year. Just picking one, please explain how Russell Martin is better.
    The track record for 1.....3x All Star and a GG/SS winner....w/numerous playoff apprearances. And yes...while it's true he is slumping a bit w/the average.....he still packs a lot of pop....only 2 less HR than 'Mauer w/Power' in about 100 less ABs. Calls a great game too.

    Besides...ask any of the guys @ Bristol who they'd take btwn Russ and 'Mauer w/Power' and it would likely be unanimous.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,418

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post

    Besides...ask any of the guys @ Bristol who they'd take btwn Russ and 'Mauer w/Power' and it would likely be unanimous.
    Clearly, most analysts want a player who's worse in every single offensive category as well as fielding. Not to mention hitting sub .200 in the Yankees' lineup.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,436

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    The track record for 1.....3x All Star and a GG/SS winner....w/numerous playoff apprearances. And yes...while it's true he is slumping a bit w/the average.....he still packs a lot of pop....only 2 less HR than 'Mauer w/Power' in about 100 less ABs. Calls a great game too.

    Besides...ask any of the guys @ Bristol who they'd take btwn Russ and 'Mauer w/Power' and it would likely be unanimous.
    Martin is a dog, both as a player and facially. With a mug like his, thank goodness it's hidden behind a mask.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    Clearly, most analysts want a player who's worse in every single offensive category as well as fielding. Not to mention hitting sub .200 in the Yankees' lineup.
    Who's team is having the better year?

    I rest my case.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,418

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    Who's team is having the better year?

    I rest my case.
    Rest what case? You were clearly wrong, so you have to jump to another irrelevant comparison.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    Who's team is having the better year?

    I rest my case.
    Using 87's own logic:

    The Yankees are having a better year with Russell Martin catching than the Orioles are with Matt Weiters catching.

    ergo, Russell Martin is a better catcher.


    The Ravens have had better years with Joe Flacco at quarterback than the Falcons have had with Matt Ryan at quarterback.

    ergo, Flacco is a better quarterback.



    I rest my case.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LarryN View Post
    Using 87's own logic:

    The Yankees are having a better year with Russell Martin catching than the Orioles are with Matt Weiters catching.

    ergo, Russell Martin is a better catcher.


    The Ravens have had better years with Joe Flacco at quarterback than the Falcons have had with Matt Ryan at quarterback.

    ergo, Flacco is a better quarterback.
    COULD NOT be any more wrong.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    COULD NOT be any more wrong.
    Your logic.

    Own it.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Perry Hall
    Posts
    1,419

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LarryN View Post
    Your logic.

    Own it.
    Kinda funny how when you "shove-it" right up his you-know-what like that, all you get from "87" is..........."crickets"

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    474

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 18-87-44-29 View Post
    In the grand scheme of things.....not much.

    He is lost @ the plate...pointblank. Good luck if you need a crunch hit from him. You're looking @ either a K or a weak grounder/DP ball. And what's more.....his 'hailed' D has even seemed to take a step backwards.

    Off the tip of my head.....I can think of @ least 12-15 Cs better than him right now. Put him on the trade market and you'll probably be sorely disappointed w/what you'd be proposed in return.
    I have no doubt that your head has a "tip"

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,536

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesdean View Post
    The problem is, Wieters isn't hitting .260. He's not even hitting .250 and to me, that's disappointing. I never expected him to hit in the .320-.340 range like he was doing in the minors but I did think he'd at least be a .280 hitter.
    Over the last 8 games, he's 1 for his last 30 which has brought his average down from .258 to .238. Let's see where he finishes the season.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Jazz View Post
    Over the last 8 games, he's 1 for his last 30 which has brought his average down from .258 to .238. Let's see where he finishes the season.

    I don't know where he'll finish but there's no denying he's a below average major league hitter. Like almost all the hitters they put in the line up every day, he's a free swinger, gets himself out on pitches he should be taking and has very little pop in his bat for someone as big as he is. And his bat speed is almost non-existent. As I mentioned in the other post, he's basically Rick Dempsey reincarnated with a little bit more power. If there were 3 or 4 really good hitters in that line up it wouldn't be so problematic but Wieters just adds to the futility.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesdean View Post
    The problem is, Wieters isn't hitting .260. He's not even hitting .250 and to me, that's disappointing. I never expected him to hit in the .320-.340 range like he was doing in the minors but I did think he'd at least be a .280 hitter. At the major league level, he's a very good defensive catcher who is below average offensively. And from what I've seen the past two years, it doesn't look like that's going to change anytime soon. I keep reading these Johnny Bench comparisons and that's beyond laughable. Right now, I'd compare him more to Rick Dempsey than Bench.
    Right now he's a .259 lifetime hitter in the majors. My guess is that some years he'll hit .275 or .280, others he might hit around .240. Sure it's disappointing, people really expected him to be almost Bench-like at the plate. He's at .238 right now, and could be at .250+ in 10 days with a hot streak. A great defensive catcher with some pop at the plate is more than average to me, overall.

    Frankly, I think guys like Markakis and Wieters would produce more if the front office would put real high average sluggers in the middle of the order to help them out... but that's another matter altogether.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,536

    Default

    The whole lineup seems to flail away at the plate, it's gotten worse as the offense has struggled and they press to make things happen, sort of a downward spiral of suck. Be nice if they taught guys from the minors on up to take pitches the way the great NYY and BOS teams of the last decade did.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    8,274

    Default

    Wieters made the mistake of being drafted by the Orioles.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Jazz View Post
    The whole lineup seems to flail away at the plate, it's gotten worse as the offense has struggled and they press to make things happen, sort of a downward spiral of suck. Be nice if they taught guys from the minors on up to take pitches the way the great NYY and BOS teams of the last decade did.
    I was thinking last night..."I wonder what the team record is for offensive strikeouts?" I mean, these guys go down 10 times a night it seems. I don't know what the record is but this Oriole team HAS to be on a pace to threaten, if not, obliterate it.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,371

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mdlmark View Post
    Kinda funny how when you "shove-it" right up his you-know-what like that, all you get from "87" is..........."crickets"
    Guys, comon now. Come to the realization that locker combo is going to intentionally disagree with everything you say, no matter what logic is used. You could counter-argue with the most factually based, complete piece of evidence to beat him in a verbal disagreement, and he will still say that you're wrong. He's not here to create discussion. He's here to play the role of forum troll and he loves to be fed. I mean comon, he's probably chuckling softly in mommy's basement as he reads this...

  18. #38
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    253

    Default

    Wish they would end his switch hitting and see how he does for the rest of the year. Everybody knows he can hit better right handed. Try it..what have you got to lose.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278