Then pardon me for misunderstanding your statement of:
Originally Posted by golflover0311
"Doesn't matter what the circumstance, there is no reason for a man to put your hands on a woman. Any man that does is a "PUNK" plain and simple. That's right, I said it."
"So it doesn't matter what the circumstance, there is no reason" means there are exceptions. My bad for misunderstanding your clear black and white blanket statement. Fellow, I missed no point with your statement. In fact, I expanded your statement to say that not only should a man not unlawfully strike a woman but I said the same applies to a man unlawfully striking another man. Assault laws were not just written for men striking women. So it's not me who missed the point. You have no point.