Wow, you're kidding me, she didn't testify? That actually falls right in line with my saying I'm looking forward to her testifying now doesn't it?
Hillary was the first to take the blame, but now it's Obama. Just who is it that's really responsible? THAT has nothing to do with her testimony, and I feel it should be clear to us as soon as possible who is responsible instead of after an election. That's just too convenient.
I don't know, you tell me.Originally Posted by SoSad
Let me take this slowly for you SoSad.................Hillary Clinton took Responsibility for the Death of Ambassador Stevens because she is our Secretary of State so department head of the Department that Stevens worked for......................The president of the United States then claimed ultimate responsibility for the whole thing because he is the President and also the person that Hillary Clinton works for. Are you following? Do I need to go further?
Since you are so used to doing things S-L-0-W, let me catch you up:
Hilary Clinton was present during the Rose Garden speech when President Obama gave his first "It was the video" speech, to be followed by many dozen "It was the video" speeches. Mrs. Clinton gave a press conference and spent most of it apologizing to militant Muslims for "the video." She went through quite a few histrionics during this speech to make the emphatic point to the terrorists that she was very sorry for the video, and repeated the "video" mantra over and over again. In fact, Ms. Rice appeared on five Sunday morning talk shows to parrot "it was the video" (which I know, Byng, instantly makes me a racist). Mrs. Clinton also, along with President Obama, spent $70,000 (courtesy of the American taxpayer) on a commercial aired in Pakistan, doing ....YOU GUESSED IT! Apologizing for the "video".
Eventually, after weeks, and JUST IN TIME for Obama's second debate, she delivered her "The buck stops here" line. God, it's great when people throw themselves under the bus for an incompetent president!![]()
So much for the liberals taking the high ground when accusing the GOP of waging a war on women. See how condescending you are to women?
....................The president is a charlatain Chicago huckster who used every possible tactic known to man to try to cover this whole mess up with that stupid video business. That includes using Hilary Clinton and Susan Rice. To add to So Sad's excellent reply to your nasty comment, Rice was thrown under the bus too. This is because your party plays word games with political catch phrases like "war on women." Obama sent Rice out there because she was low flying bait and better she take the heat than Obama lose the election when this epic Obama cover-up was exposed. Rice got used and she got used badly.
Well thank you for jumping in with both feet Monty and making a complete arse of yourself as is often your way.
I have never talked privately with SoSad, or been on a thread when she/he declared a gender and SoSad lists her/his gender as "rather not say"! So you can take your fake, righteous indignation used to cover your rabid right-wing point of view and shove it where the sun don't shine!
Sorry songforone, I missed this post before.
Overall, I really like Hillary Clinton and feel she has done an excellent job. I felt sick when she took responsibility for Benghazi alone, and felt there may have been more to it which came to be made more clear when Obama finally said that he was ultimately responsible.
Part II while unrelated to this thread (sorry) had to do with Clinton as SOS jumping into the illegal immigration situation, and going to New York to speak out against (I believe) Arizona's law. I don't recall all of the details, but I know at the time I was wondering what she was doing having supported Hillary in everything else she had been doing. She also went there to protest the different driver's licenses that New York was thinking about handing out, so I'm not clear on which incident I found so odd.
Perhaps this was not a terrorist act and should be labeled "work place violence" as the Obama administration did at Ft. Hood.
http://nation.foxnews.com/fort-hood-...place-violence
It's called a prostate, smart one.Originally Posted by Bland Food
Hmm! Interesting that you would single out the President for how he described Fort Hood the way that you say while those on the right, including yourself played political football with the death of Ambassador Stevens by trying to paint the same picture that Stevens was killed in his 'workplace' due to the President not providing him adequate security. When anybody with at least a 6th. grade education could have worked out for themselves that the American Consulate had not been operated as such for weeks if not months, so it was not Stevens 'workplace'. And nobody from the right even questioned what the Ambassador was doing in Benghazi with the CIA in the first place because it did not suit their political agenda to do so!
No double standard or politics in the lead up to an Election here, is there now Terry K?![]()
So are you righties still going on and on about this old debunked non-story?
LOL at any comparisons to watergate. Please.
This is just a koo-koo conspiracy theory, and the right clings to it out of electoral bitterness.
Everything that has come out since you guys jumped to conclusions has debunked them.
|
| Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv | Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278 |