The 'Great State' can fund it from the pockets of those directly utilizing its services. The irresponsibility of those deciding to breed while being ill-equipped to fund their lifestyle choice should not be a cost to those who had no involvement in any aspect of said irresponsibility.
Really, Sparky? Maybe a little review is in order:
You asked a question, I gave you an answer. The fact that you didn't want to hear it and expected no answer is not my problem.
It's completely irrelevant. I answered the question exactly as it was asked; now you are trying to slither around an uncomfortable point. So unless you now wish to assert that there are NO wildlife biologists employed as gamekeepers you're just going to have to suck it up and move on.
'Free?'
'Public' roads?
The illegitimacy of the funding mechanism derives from the denial of 'due process of law by taking the property of one and bestowing it upon another. This onerous financial burden cannot be justified upon the plea that it is in the interest of economy, or will promote efficiency or safety.'
Yes roads paid for and maintained with public funds, as opposed to private ones! You seem to only be happy if you pay NO taxes. Unfortunatley our society does not work this way. If you want one like this MOVE!!!!!! By the way explain how this legitimizes the secessionists claims!
I merely asked you a follow-up question regarding whether or not you had any data related to the proportion of actual private sector gamekeepers with formal academic training in wildlife biology. You became needlessly unhinged. If you don't have any data related to the issue... that is fine. If you do, I actually would like to see it.
Again with the 'public' funds...
I would be happy with individuals paying full freight for the goods and services that they want and not forcing the costs of those goods and services onto others. This is what happens on a daily basis in the actual private sector.
Which particular claim or claims would you like me to address?
How inconveniently incomplete.
You said: "teachers make a good salary compared to some other professions that require more academic background
Since teachers in Md require a Masters, please show data that indicates biologists and/ or chemists (your examples), with "more academic background" than Md teachers, yet, are making less less than the starting teachers salary in this state.
There, I dumbed it down for you...good luck.![]()
Please use the following link to go to the White House's ”We the People” website and sign the petition to prosecute the advocates of secession for sedition.
http://wh.gov/Xrn6
Also, please forward this link to all of your friends who may be inclined to sign it. We need 150 signatures in order for the petition to become searchable.
You don't have to have a Masters to start teaching in MD so I didn't include other professions with advanced degrees. What I meant by "more academic background" is that the course of studies to get those degrees is much more difficult than the courses required to get an education degree.
Why the insult? Can't your arguments stand on their own without ad hominem attacks?
|
| Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv | Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278 |