KING: Petraeus Says CIA's Talking Points Were Edited to Play Down Terrorism

[Creekman]

Washington Democrat, lol.

Who could ever doubt him.

Peter King. New York Republican, lol.

Who could ever doubt him.

[ms maggie]

Now here's a surprise: the Dems story on this is different than King's.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-...azi/?pageNum=1

Not that it would be unusual for King to lie when trying to attack Obama.

http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/...-king-over-oba

[Creekman]

WOW! I am sure the four souls had family and friends "WHO CARED" And, I CARE! I care because they were my fellow Americans and this was an act of WAR! This was a cover up from the get go. Just because his sheeple are not too bright- he thinks none of us will question him. This was a COVER UP and this information was deliberately taken out. This is disgusting and heads should roll over this.

Shouldn't you be working with the Congress to get their immigration legislation ready for the President?

[reg_indy]

Now here's a surprise: the Dems story on this is different than King's.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-...azi/?pageNum=1

From the Link:


The CIA talking points are a source of controversy because U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice used them to describe the nature of the attack on CBS' "Face the Nation" and other shows on Sept. 16. Republicans have attacked Rice, who is considered a possible nominee to replace Hillary Clinton as secretary of state, for suggesting the attack was the result of spontaneous protests.


CBS News obtained the CIA talking points given both to Rice and members of the House intelligence committee on Sept. 15, and they make no specific reference to "terrorism" being a likely factor in the assault. However, they did indicate that "extremists participated in the violent demonstrations."

[dsummoner]

From the Link:


The CIA talking points are a source of controversy because U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice used them to describe the nature of the attack on CBS' "Face the Nation" and other shows on Sept. 16. Republicans have attacked Rice, who is considered a possible nominee to replace Hillary Clinton as secretary of state, for suggesting the attack was the result of spontaneous protests.


CBS News obtained the CIA talking points given both to Rice and members of the House intelligence committee on Sept. 15, and they make no specific reference to "terrorism" being a likely factor in the assault. However, they did indicate that "extremists participated in the violent demonstrations."

Which goes to the 'changes made in the interagency process.'

[soulflower]

From The Hill:


House Intelligence Committee ranking member Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.) said Petraeus told lawmakers on Friday that the CIA felt in the first 24 hours that the attack was the result of a protest over the anti-Islamic YouTube video.

But Ruppersberger also said that the CIA felt it was a terrorist attack from the beginning, because there were extremists and some al Qaeda affiliates involved. "It’s all about your perception and the information that you receive," Ruppersberger told reporters.

[Jeebus]

From The Hill:

[I]
House Intelligence Committee ranking member Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.) said Petraeus told lawmakers on Friday that the CIA felt in the first 24 hours that the attack was the result of a protest over the anti-Islamic YouTube video.

And when did Susan Rice go in front of 5 network tv cameras and lie about it?

Within those first 24 hours?

Of course not.

When was the CIA memo stating it was terrorism drafted and sent to the White House?

Before or after Susan Rice was told to go in front of the cameras?

The CIA director testified that the memo that was prepared made specific references to a terrorist act, without any mentions of any video.

yet the memo Rice saw and promoted said the opposite.

Who edited it?

And why?

[Creekman]

And when did Susan Rice go in front of 5 network tv cameras and lie about it?

Within those first 24 hours?

Of course not.

When was the CIA memo stating it was terrorism drafted and sent to the White House?

Before or after Susan Rice was told to go in front of the cameras?

The CIA director testified that the memo that was prepared made specific references to a terrorist act, without any mentions of any video.

yet the memo Rice saw and promoted said the opposite.

Who edited it?

And why?

You seem to be very confused.

Go get some new talking points that actually reflect the facts as they are coming out of the Intelligence Committees.

[SalisburySage]

Who told potential rescuers to stand down and let our people die. Clearly it was Obama.
That murderous pig.

[gonzoliberal]

Who told potential rescuers to stand down and let our people die. Clearly it was Obama.
That murderous pig.

"...clearly..."


You haven't been right in months.

You're not suddenly going to start now.

[soulflower]

You seem to be very confused.

Go get some new talking points that actually reflect the facts as they are coming out of the Intelligence Committees.

Thank you!

It's hard to debate someone who doesn't believe in citing known facts

[Creekman]

Who told potential rescuers to stand down and let our people die. Clearly it was Obama.
That murderous pig.

Its about time for you to give up on the BS. Your shtick stinks! Just the same old lies, ad infinitum.

[ms maggie]

"...clearly..."


You haven't been right in months.

You're not suddenly going to start now.

LOL. There is that old saw about even a blind pig getting an acorn once in a while. So maybe someday.....

[BlandFood]

Bobo sent this message to the 4 he had murdered when they pleaded for help...........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDAmPIq29ro