Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27

Thread: LaRoche Talks going slow

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    15,309

    Default LaRoche Talks going slow

    This might be the right time to make a splash.
    LaRoche wants a 3 year deal...and if he can't get that in DC, Baltimore is right around the corner. He won't have to move, and he is a major upgrade at 1st.
    This would take him through age 35, which is fine for a 1b.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,312

    Default

    He would be a good addition. but the O's tried to sign him last year, and he wanted no part of it. Perhaps his opinion of Baltimore has changed after seeing them make the playoffs, but I would think he'll stay in DC unless the O's outbid the Nats and Boston (who is also reported as interested). Given that his salary demands are already pretty high, outrbidding Boston & DC will mean they have to pay him way more than he'll really be able to live up to.

    And then there's the Angelos factor.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    1 Winning Drive
    Posts
    5,028

    Default

    I don't see him as his demands are pretty high. I doubt the king gets into a bidding war with anyone so I expect him back in D.C..

    I expect Reynolds will be back at 1b for the O's. If not, the FA market is ugly and Davis might be the only alternative.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Far from home View Post
    This might be the right time to make a splash.
    LaRoche wants a 3 year deal...and if he can't get that in DC, Baltimore is right around the corner. He won't have to move, and he is a major upgrade at 1st.
    This would take him through age 35, which is fine for a 1b.
    PETER ANGELOS. 'Nuff said

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,450

    Default

    What's the fascination with LaRoche? Davis is younger and better. Besides, I don't want any Frenchmen on the team until we clean up in the Dominican Republic.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hector View Post
    What's the fascination with LaRoche? Davis is younger and better. Besides, I don't want any Frenchmen on the team until we clean up in the Dominican Republic.
    I think the fascination is with having a full team. Davis can certainly play 1B. but they are considering a replacement for Reynolds. Davis will probably maintain his roll as the primary DH while filling in for different positional guys throughout the year.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Crofton, MD
    Posts
    815

    Default

    Davis is younger, but I don't think there is a better defensive 1b then Laroche.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,450

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    I think the fascination is with having a full team. Davis can certainly play 1B. but they are considering a replacement for Reynolds. Davis will probably maintain his roll as the primary DH while filling in for different positional guys throughout the year.
    If the O's pay top dollar for LaRoche, they'll have to play him and that will limit the use of Davis to some extent. I'm very confident that Davis would far out-perform LaRoche given equal opportunity so hopefully the O's will forget LaRoche and put Davis at first and leave him there all year.

    As far as fill-in for position players, the opportunities will be very limited assuming that Machado, Jones, Markakis and McLouth are the position players.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    15,309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hector View Post
    If the O's pay top dollar for LaRoche, they'll have to play him and that will limit the use of Davis to some extent. I'm very confident that Davis would far out-perform LaRoche given equal opportunity so hopefully the O's will forget LaRoche and put Davis at first and leave him there all year.

    As far as fill-in for position players, the opportunities will be very limited assuming that Machado, Jones, Markakis and McLouth are the position players.
    Davis didn't play 1st for most of the second half of last season - he was mostly in RF and at DH.
    Davis would be fine as full time DH and spot reliever.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,450

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Far from home View Post
    Davis didn't play 1st for most of the second half of last season - he was mostly in RF and at DH.
    Davis would be fine as full time DH and spot reliever.
    My assumption is that Markakis won't miss half the season like he did in 2012 and that the opportunities in RF for Davis will be very limited in 2013. I also assume his AB's will be limited if you stick him in the bullpen as a spot reliever.

    Davis has been very productive when given the opportunity and I don't follow the reluctance to stick him at 1B and leave him there.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hector View Post
    My assumption is that Markakis won't miss half the season like he did in 2012 and that the opportunities in RF for Davis will be very limited in 2013. I also assume his AB's will be limited if you stick him in the bullpen as a spot reliever.

    Davis has been very productive when given the opportunity and I don't follow the reluctance to stick him at 1B and leave him there.
    I don't see a reluctance. There is an open position at 1B. If you move Davis to 1B, all you've done is filled one vacancy by creating another.

    if it helps you wrap your head around the topic, discuss it from the position that Davis has been given the 1B job. then pick someone to replace Davis in the role he filled last year.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    the NC sandhills
    Posts
    26,143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    Perhaps his opinion of Baltimore has changed after seeing them make the playoffs
    Perhaps not.

    Unless, as you say, they outbid the Nats and Sox.

    I'll add the "severely" adjective to that.

    Baltimore is a top free agent graveyard right now.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    395

    Default

    This Span trade could be cover for the Nats not signing Laroche. Although, Span would've worked nicely here and we could've dispensed with the risk of what to do if we don't sign McLouth. He would give us speed we don't have and he gets on base and doesn't strike out a lot.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,606

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    I don't see a reluctance. There is an open position at 1B. If you move Davis to 1B, all you've done is filled one vacancy by creating another.

    if it helps you wrap your head around the topic, discuss it from the position that Davis has been given the 1B job. then pick someone to replace Davis in the role he filled last year.
    I think Hector is just hoping that the full time DH job goes to a certain aging, mediocre singles hitter.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    baltimore
    Posts
    781

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jordan77 View Post
    This Span trade could be cover for the Nats not signing Laroche. Although, Span would've worked nicely here and we could've dispensed with the risk of what to do if we don't sign McLouth. He would give us speed we don't have and he gets on base and doesn't strike out a lot.
    Span would have resisted playing left. With his singles bat, a move to left would have been financially detrimental once free agency came along. Corner outfielders need more pop.

    On the other hand, LaRoche is likely out of the Nats picture. Morse will move back to 1st leaving no room for Adam. That erodes the guy's bargaining position a little and it might present an opportunity here.

    This is kind of like the Red Sox reportedly focusing on Swisher, Ross and Napoli. Moves like those fill up spots thereby crowding out other FAs who have to look elsewhere.

    Pete is a bottom feeder from way back and his lawyerly preoccupation with oneupsmanship is mostly infuriating but once in a while it does channel guys into town. See Tejada or Lopez for examples of that.

    Will Hamilton, LaRoche etc. find opportunities limited to the point that the O's are their best option? I still would not bet on that but moves like Span do eliminate some competition and that can only help.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weenie View Post
    Pete is a bottom feeder from way back and his lawyerly preoccupation with oneupsmanship is mostly infuriating but once in a while it does channel guys into town. See Tejada or Lopez for examples of that.
    can I ask you to elaborate on this?

    not the part about him being a bottom feeder, but how that was a positive factor in bringing in the 2 FAs you mentioned.

    the reason I ask, is because I can't see a connection between the two.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Crofton, MD
    Posts
    815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weenie View Post
    Span would have resisted playing left. With his singles bat, a move to left would have been financially detrimental once free agency came along. Corner outfielders need more pop.

    On the other hand, LaRoche is likely out of the Nats picture. Morse will move back to 1st leaving no room for Adam. That erodes the guy's bargaining position a little and it might present an opportunity here.

    This is kind of like the Red Sox reportedly focusing on Swisher, Ross and Napoli. Moves like those fill up spots thereby crowding out other FAs who have to look elsewhere.

    Pete is a bottom feeder from way back and his lawyerly preoccupation with oneupsmanship is mostly infuriating but once in a while it does channel guys into town. See Tejada or Lopez for examples of that.

    Will Hamilton, LaRoche etc. find opportunities limited to the point that the O's are their best option? I still would not bet on that but moves like Span do eliminate some competition and that can only help.
    Or no room for Morse, rumors on the four letter network, says Morse for shields...Morse makes sense in the AL, he is a defensive liability, and the fact span comes alot cheaper than Bourn or upton who were all rumored to the nats makes it a little more likely they might offer Laroche more than 2 years.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Crofton, MD
    Posts
    815

    Default

    Span CF Harper LF Werth RF....there's not going to be many gaps in that outfield...

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ajc54terp View Post
    Span CF Harper LF Werth RF....there's not going to be many gaps in that outfield...

    I envy DC for getting Span. I would have loved to have seen him playing in baltimore this summer.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Crofton, MD
    Posts
    815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    I envy DC for getting Span. I would have loved to have seen him playing in baltimore this summer.
    They gave up a dam good pitching prospect for him, Alex Meyer, but they're loaded with pitching prospects, the next move is to sign Laroche and trade morse for a starter, dam that defense would be sick.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278