Page 3 of 16 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 303

Thread: Democrat says those calling Susan Rice "incompetent" are using "racial code words"

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    PRCa./TN.
    Posts
    54,190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Speaking of the incompetent, McCain, the son of an Admiral, graduated near the bottom of his class at the Naval academy. He also chose Sarah Palin as his running mate in 2008
    But is it 'code' to call McCain incompetent for his academic performance (elder discrimination and a racist hate of Whitey as well as sexism for having chosen Palin)... surely it must be because to suggest otherwise (excluding age and sex) would be supportive of a race based differing set of standards (which is racist by definition).

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    PRCa./TN.
    Posts
    54,190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phineas Finn View Post
    I don't think anyone's trying to give her a free pass. She repeated the information that she was given -- how is that "incompetent" or "lazy."?

    When Donald Rumsfeld repeated intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, was he called incompetent when those weapons were not found? Was he called lazy?
    The 'lazy' aspect is one that I have not propounded. Rumsfeld's repeated statements were incompetent (repeatedly). The incompetent adjective works with both the regurgitation of talking points and even more so if were not merely the regurgitation of talking points.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Baltimore county
    Posts
    3,853

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mom49of4 View Post
    Maybe if we stop looking for racism every time someone says something we may do better.
    Who said you had to look?

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,412

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skeemer View Post
    Would it be acceptable to describe a well educated and accomplished white person as lazy or incompetent?

    What if the person is question is actually lazy and/or incompetent?

    Like I said, a dictionary would be helpful. The list seems to grow as time goes on.
    I'll make it easier for you

    "Stupid is as stupid does"

    Don't call people stupid unless they've done something stupid...

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Baltimore county
    Posts
    3,853

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dsummoner View Post
    But is it 'code' to call McCain incompetent for his academic performance (elder discrimination and a racist hate of Whitey as well as sexism for having chosen Palin)... surely it must be because to suggest otherwise (excluding age and sex) would be supportive of a race based differing set of standards (which is racist by definition).
    Great info.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    21,398

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dsummoner View Post
    The USIC has propounded a number of reasons for hiding its incompetence. 'Valid' is in the eye of the beholder. The actual harm comes from an administration independent view that is to be opaque to those to whom it purportedly answers to (the citizenry). Hiding information, lying to the American public and claiming secrecy/privilege where no rational justification for the existence of the same is present is actual harm.



    Yes, 'we' do.
    "Not valid" is also in the eye of the beholder.

    It sounds like you're saying that the administration has an obligation to disbelieve the Intelligence Community and to carry ot its own investigation. If, as has been speculated on this forum, a CIA installation in the consulate annex was a possible reason for the attack, wouldn't withholding a statement on a terrorist connection be justified? Does any administration have an obligation to make public all information it receives from the intelligence community? Hell, last year I helped release a declassified version of Senate Executive Sessions that took place in 1967 -- and some parts are still classified.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loch Raven Blvd
    Posts
    8,369

    Default

    She's very light-skinned and skin-tone is the most important factor in employment for black Americans.

    In America especially, Harrison says, when people think of race or race relations they commonly think of black and white. In fact, skin tone differences are responsible for increasing differences in perceptions within standard racially defined groups such as “blacks.” This diversity within races based on skin complexion has a long history but only recently have researchers begun to understand what these differences can mean.

    “Our results indicate that there appears to be a skin tone preference in regards to job selection,” said Harrison. “This finding is possibly due to the common belief that fair-skinned blacks probably have more similarities with whites than do dark-skinned blacks, which in turn makes whites feel more comfortable around them.”

    Society, he said, equates lighter skin with attractiveness, intelligence, competency and likeability, while we are often given a “much more dismal and bleak picture” of those who have darker skin.
    She could probably "pass" and appears to have "good hair" too,

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,412

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LarryN View Post
    How about "clean", "bright" and "articulate"? "Light skinned" and "no Negro dialect"?
    How about avoiding historically racial code words and dog whistles all together?

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    21,398

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dsummoner View Post
    The 'lazy' aspect is one that I have not propounded. Rumsfeld's repeated statements were incompetent (repeatedly). The incompetent adjective works with both the regurgitation of talking points and even more so if were not merely the regurgitation of talking points.
    I don't think anything Rumfeld said was incompetent -- they were lies, lies told in what he and the administration believed to be a valid National Security objective. He certainly wasn't incompetent.

    Now, if Rice had seen all the available intelligence and knew it was terrorist attack, then she lied -- and if you don't believe there was a valid reason to lie then that's a reason to oppose her as a future Secretary of State, but it's definitely not incompetent.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    21,398

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    How about avoiding historically racial code words and dog whistles all together?
    I think the problem is that many people are arguing that all words should mean the same thing to all people -- no matter what their background or historical perspective may be. Now, whether those arguments are sincere is a matter for an individual's conscience.

  11. #51
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    How about avoiding historically racial code words and dog whistles all together?
    What if we don't know that the word "incompetent" was a racial code word or a dog whistle? That is the whole point, there seem to be new code words and whistles every day. When those on the left use ones that are not so new, they seem to get a pass....oh, that's just Joe & Harry being Joe & Harry. yuck, yuck, yuck.

    Sometimes, incompetent is just incompetent.

    Since we stupid whiteys don't seem to know, what word should have been chosen by someone (white) who was of the opinion that Dr. Rice was incompetent?

  12. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    PRCa./TN.
    Posts
    54,190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phineas Finn View Post
    "Not valid" is also in the eye of the beholder.

    It sounds like you're saying that the administration has an obligation to disbelieve the Intelligence Community and to carry ot its own investigation. If, as has been speculated on this forum, a CIA installation in the consulate annex was a possible reason for the attack, wouldn't withholding a statement on a terrorist connection be justified? Does any administration have an obligation to make public all information it receives from the intelligence community? Hell, last year I helped release a declassified version of Senate Executive Sessions that took place in 1967 -- and some parts are still classified.
    The administration (as with all administrations) has an obligation to have competent people involved with the intelligence cycle and furthermore has an obligation to be honest with the citizens.

    The CIA annex was in a different location than the Consulate. The presence of the CIA in Benghazi was well known in very short course following the incident and before the talking points were distributed (what specifically the CIA was doing there remains to be answered). Given that (a) the attack had already happened and (b) the CIA's presence there was already exposed, what rationale does one have for withholding a statement of terrorist involvement?

    One would rather see more disclosure than less and a reversal of the trend of stamping 'top secret' on virtually everything. In regards to your last point, what possible basis is there for keeping information from a (the) Senate Executive Sessions that took place in 1967 secret in 2011/2012?

  13. #53
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,947

    Default

    Calling her incompetent is not racial. It is completely inaccurate however. And actually if you look at McCain, somewhat off the rails hysterical.

  14. #54
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Speaking of the incompetent, McCain, the son of an Admiral, graduated near the bottom of his class at the Naval academy. He also chose Sarah Palin as his running mate in 2008
    How did he get in the Naval Academy in the first place? Did being the son of an Admiral have anything to do with it? How many more deserving candidates for admission were passed over?

  15. #55
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,412

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phineas Finn View Post
    I think the problem is that many people are arguing that all words should mean the same thing to all people -- no matter what their background or historical perspective may be. Now, whether those arguments are sincere is a matter for an individual's conscience.
    Lots of Words can have entirely different meanings depending on the context.

  16. #56
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Yogurtshire
    Posts
    2,755

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Rice is a Rhodes scholar. She has a PhD. She has over two decades of experience in foreign policy.

    So yes, calling her incompetent or unqualified is insulting.

    It's fine to disagree with her or her philosophy. But when Repubs throw around loaded terms like 'incompetent' or 'unqualified' it rubs people the wrong way...
    So is Clinton, an accused rapist several times over. Is a Rhodes scholar automatically qualified to be a jet fighter pilot? Can they not also be both incompetent and unqualified to do so?

    Rice is obviously out of her league, she sucks, the congressional black choir see's boogie men even when they knowingly don't.

  17. #57
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Creekman View Post
    How did he get in the Naval Academy in the first place? Did being the son of an Admiral have anything to do with it? How many more deserving candidates for admission were passed over?
    I would guess just one.

  18. #58
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlandFood View Post
    So is Clinton, an accused rapist several times over. Is a Rhodes scholar automatically qualified to be a jet fighter pilot? Can they not also be both incompetent and unqualified to do so?

    Rice is obviously out of her league, she sucks, the congressional black choir see's boogie men even when they knowingly don't.
    Jet fighter pilots don't necessarily qualify as competent, as we learned with our last president.

  19. #59
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,412

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LarryN View Post
    What if we don't know that the word "incompetent" was a racial code word or a dog whistle? That is the whole point, there seem to be new code words and whistles every day. When those on the left use ones that are not so new, they seem to get a pass....oh, that's just Joe & Harry being Joe & Harry. yuck, yuck, yuck.

    Sometimes, incompetent is just incompetent.

    Since we stupid whiteys don't seem to know, what word should have been chosen by someone (white) who was of the opinion that Dr. Rice was incompetent?
    I don't make the rules. Maybe you should spend some time living in the deep south so you can familiarize yourself with this stuff

  20. #60
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Yogurtshire
    Posts
    2,755

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    I'll make it easier for you

    "Stupid is as stupid does"

    Don't call people stupid unless they've done something stupid...
    Parroting Bobo is wrong, if one actually believes him that is stupid.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278