Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 37

Thread: ...the devastating impact of Rush Limbaugh's Fluke attack

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    12,855

    Default ...the devastating impact of Rush Limbaugh's Fluke attack

    The code of silence has been swept away. Throughout the radio industry this week, there is talk of the devastating impact of Limbaugh's Fluke attack. Rush supporters are, of course, in denial. But compelling personal testimonies are suddenly out in the open, and they will prove difficult to dismiss....


    continues...


    ...
    For example Doug Stephan, president of Stephan MultiMedia and host of the nationally syndicated “Good Day” program, had this to offer:

    [excerpt] Let’s face it, the agencies and advertisers are how we survive. So to tell them that their clients are stupid for not staying in an atmosphere in which they don’t want to be is akin to the Republicans not reading the tea leaves about changing demographics.I’m not here to argue the point, but rather to tell you what this ONE incident has cost me as an independent in a sea of big corporate operators, who are obviously losing tens of millions of dollars due to this one event.
    So far this year, my losses are in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Cancellations, avoidance and decisions to just not buy across the whole format, no matter what the content...


    ..............


    One event, the demonization of Sandra Fluke, has mobilized the country.

    Customer boycotts are the ultimate democratisation of capitalism. In these cases, we have the money, and they want it.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the local pub
    Posts
    32,853

    Default

    Meanwhile, outside of the dailykos alternative betaverse...
    Sandra Fluke, the woman at the center of a media firestorm earlier this year after Rush Limbaugh called her a “slut,” spoke Saturday in front of about 10 people at the Sak ‘N Save in north Reno.
    10 people at the Sak 'N Save.

    And thanks to the corporatist Obamacare insurance protection tax you won't be able to boycott the big insurance companies. Pay up. Shut up. We're all ***** now.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    over the Rainbow
    Posts
    16,226

    Default

    And then there's this:

    Limbaugh's ratings are higher than before the recent brouhaha over Sandra Fluke and the effort to remove him from the air is collapsing on itself. Now more bad news has come out for the Rush haters: Former Limbaugh advertiser Carbonite has now publicly stated that its decision to pull its ads from his show has been bad for the company's bottom line.

    On August 1, Carbonite CEO David Friend held a conference call to announce the company's second-quarter earnings results. They weren't good which led the company's stock to drop 15 percent in same-day trading. Key to the drop in Carbonite's growth was its withdrawal from Limbaugh's show. By withdrawing its ads under pressure from the far left, Carbonite disrupted its own business model of attracting many small-time accounts through mass advertising.

    "It turned out to be a bigger hole in our revenue than we had thought when we initially did this," Friend said on the investor call.

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew...its-censorship
    As usual DailyKos attempt to further it's agenda is amusing, but not quite factual.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    12,855

    Default

    Two opposing anecdotes...

    Newsbusters has as much a cred problem as KOS, depending on who you ask.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts
    22,253

    Default

    Did Ms. Fluke ever achieve her dream life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness by having someone else pay for her birth control? I wouldn't want her sex life to suffer under the terrible pall of her having to pay for her own pills, abortions, and what have you. Life is so unfair to people like her, those cursed with an insatiable need for government provided free stuff. Just the thought of having to deal with those wind-blistered palms because you always have to have your hands out gives me the willies. Let's hope she gets fitted for one of those government subsidized feedbags in the near future.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bullmikey View Post
    Did Ms. Fluke ever achieve her dream life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness by having someone else pay for her birth control? I wouldn't want her sex life to suffer under the terrible pall of her having to pay for her own pills, abortions, and what have you. Life is so unfair to people like her, those cursed with an insatiable need for government provided free stuff. Just the thought of having to deal with those wind-blistered palms because you always have to have your hands out gives me the willies. Let's hope she gets fitted for one of those government subsidized feedbags in the near future.
    You mean have prescription birth control treated like every other medication? I think so.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    With my family!
    Posts
    76,119

    Default

    Without having to make a co-pay. Which is not like every other medication.
    My children are my legacy.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mom49of4 View Post
    Without having to make a co-pay. Which is not like every other medication.
    Where did you see that? The issue was whether bc would be part of Rx drug coverage. And plans differ, some have co-pays, some don't. I don't find anything that says Fluke was suggesting preferential treatment for bc.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    PRCa./TN.
    Posts
    54,138

    Default

    Make it OTC. Problem solved.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    With my family!
    Posts
    76,119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ms maggie View Post
    Where did you see that? The issue was whether bc would be part of Rx drug coverage. And plans differ, some have co-pays, some don't. I don't find anything that says Fluke was suggesting preferential treatment for bc.
    My mistake Democrats want co-pay free birth control.
    My children are my legacy.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,608

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dsummoner View Post
    Make it OTC. Problem solved.
    Agreed.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loch Raven Blvd
    Posts
    8,369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ms maggie View Post
    The issue was whether bc would be part of Rx drug coverage.
    I believe the issue was whether a Catholic institution (Georgetown University) would be required to subsidize something that violated their official doctrine.

    Which of course was a red herring to begin with, as the Target store 3 miles from the campus provides monthly BC pills for a fee of $9, no health plan needed.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mom49of4 View Post
    My mistake Democrats want co-pay free birth control.
    If it's co-pay, it's not free. LOL.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    With my family!
    Posts
    76,119

    Default

    Democrats Celebrate Co-Pay Free Birth Control; Republicans Call Again for Health Care Repeal Vote
    My children are my legacy.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,242

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dsummoner View Post
    Make it OTC. Problem solved.
    You are so ahead of the herd


    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/WomensH...7#.UKz9CTn3BPU

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,242

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeebus View Post
    I believe the issue was whether a Catholic institution (Georgetown University) would be required to subsidize something that violated their official doctrine.

    Which of course was a red herring to begin with, as the Target store 3 miles from the campus provides monthly BC pills for a fee of $9, no health plan needed.
    Birth Control is not like condoms, it is a medication, and there are many issues to be addressed when prescribing them, not all can take the $9 BC.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    PRCa./TN.
    Posts
    54,138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    I am against prohibition and 'scheduling' of drugs. Government has aided and abetted the creation of a so-called 'healthcare' oligopoly under the current system.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loch Raven Blvd
    Posts
    8,369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    Birth Control is not like condoms, it is a medication, and there are many issues to be addressed when prescribing them, not all can take the $9 BC.
    Which doesn't change the fundamental of the problem whatsoever - can the US Govt force a religious institution to pay for sterilization, abortion, or birth control procedures that violate their church beliefs.

    As I'm no fan of any organized religion, I should be the one saying "Who cares?"

    But I'm a big fan of the separation clause of the Constitution.

    Just as I don't want religion creeping into any phase of the Govt, I surely don't want the Govt creeping into any phase of religion. They should be allowed to "opt out" of any medical procedure that violates their accepted teachings, and if you don't like it, don't work there or go to school there.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,242

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeebus View Post
    Which doesn't change the fundamental of the problem whatsoever - can the US Govt force a religious institution to pay for sterilization, abortion, or birth control procedures that violate their church beliefs.

    As I'm no fan of any organized religion, I should be the one saying "Who cares?"

    But I'm a big fan of the separation clause of the Constitution.

    Just as I don't want religion creeping into any phase of the Govt, I surely don't want the Govt creeping into any phase of religion. They should be allowed to "opt out" of any medical procedure that violates their accepted teachings, and if you don't like it, don't work there or go to school there.
    I was having this very same conversation on another thread, my thoughts being, and speaking from a nurse for 30+ years, is that unfortunately the religious aspects of care does creep into your life and you might not have control over it. For instance, you are taken to a Catholic hospital ED after a rape or during a miscarriage, you might not receive what is considered 'standard of care', might not receive the education or options, choices you would at a non religious based hospital.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    31,319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    Birth Control is not like condoms, it is a medication, and there are many issues to be addressed when prescribing them, not all can take the $9 BC.
    Great, then let the small percentage who need an rx get one and rest can buy it OTC. That, however, is not what Fluke and co. want. They want it all paid for across the board.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278