Gilman or Westminster ...who's number One

[Outside Looking In]

Again if calling someone soft and slow is the worst you can bring up, I can definitely live with that and would say it again just like I told you before! Many people on this board have said the same things. I have also said that a kid isn't the best tackler. I have also said that a kid is too small and needs to gain weight or needs to get taller. This is big time Varsity football, I don't consider these as disparaging remarks. Kids hear much worse every day in school. Maybe you and the other trolls can come up with a list of words that you can't say.

If this is how you rationalize putting down a kid than you are truly a sad person. I feel sorry for you.

Have you ever heard the saying "if you do not have anything nice to say than do not say anything at all"?

These are 13-17 year old KIDS. Any type of comment about them can have an enormous effect on their psyche.

[Mtown Knight]

WOW!!!!! The WWE has NOTHING on you boys!!!!!! Can't wait for Part II.

[prepfan]

WOW!!!!! The WWE has NOTHING on you boys!!!!!! Can't wait for Part II.

Part II ? , We went past part II, years ago ! !

We're into our fifth season with this particular troll. This little routine about "degrading" players is actually a re-run.

I have LOL-ed enough times to make those around me consider calling the white coats.

If you want entertainment, go to the archives and search through the GA fools 8500 posts; maybe you can find posts from the airport in England fussing with CHC after their game with G.Prep 1. [Obsession is too mild a word for this dude].

Search for keywords "resume" and you might get an amusing series where he was bragging about his accomplishments (in life); not on the football field.

There was a classic post last year which depicted him and his son, at home, reflecting on the Turkey Bowl; which, of course, has nada to do with Gilman.

Forget WWE, we've passed SNL, Carson, and looking to go right past #1 I Love Lucy.

[Outside Looking In]

Part II ? , We went past part II, years ago ! !

We're into our fifth season with this particular troll. This little routine about "degrading" players is actually a re-run.

I have LOL-ed enough times to make those around me consider calling the white coats.

If you want entertainment, go to the archives and search through the GA fools 8500 posts; maybe you can find posts from the airport in England fussing with CHC after their game with G.Prep 1. [Obsession is too mild a word for this dude].

Search for keywords "resume" and you might get an amusing series where he was bragging about his accomplishments (in life); not on the football field.

There was a classic post last year which depicted him and his son, at home, reflecting on the Turkey Bowl; which, of course, has nada to do with Gilman.

Forget WWE, we've passed SNL, Carson, and looking to go right past #1 I Love Lucy.

He is something else. 8500 posts? That is crazy.

[GREYHOUND ALUM]

If this is how you rationalize putting down a kid than you are truly a sad person. I feel sorry for you.

Have you ever heard the saying "if you do not have anything nice to say than do not say anything at all"?

These are 13-17 year old KIDS. Any type of comment about them can have an enormous effect on their psyche.

So not only are you the board judge and jury but now also a child psychologist! Oh ok I see now.

Why don't you campaign to have the while board taken down because you're afraid of that it hurts a kids "psyche!" I think it's funny that you conviently place say 13-17 year old kids. Why not 18 year olds? Since many 12th grade players are 18(and older). You are the biggest hypocrite on this board besides jeebus. You rode right along with jeebus on many threads DESTROYING Aquille Carr. Basically calling every name in the book and why? Because he was 18 at the time? Well the GC kicker I spoke about is also 18. Constantly berating a team and school like you do with Dunbar does nothing to their psyche does it?

Save the BS dude and push your fake a s s agenda somewhere else. Back to ignoring you again.

[GREYHOUND ALUM]

Part II ? , We went past part II, years ago ! !

We're into our fifth season with this particular troll. This little routine about "degrading" players is actually a re-run.

I have LOL-ed enough times to make those around me consider calling the white coats.

If you want entertainment, go to the archives and search through the GA fools 8500 posts; maybe you can find posts from the airport in England fussing with CHC after their game with G.Prep 1. [Obsession is too mild a word for this dude].

Search for keywords "resume" and you might get an amusing series where he was bragging about his accomplishments (in life); not on the football field.

There was a classic post last year which depicted him and his son, at home, reflecting on the Turkey Bowl; which, of course, has nada to do with Gilman.

Forget WWE, we've passed SNL, Carson, and looking to go right past #1 I Love Lucy.

How does it feel to know that as my friend First Down says, to have Calvert Hall's daddy be Gilman? That has to hurt to the core!!!

[Jeebus]

You are the biggest hypocrite on this board besides jeebus. You rode right along with jeebus on many threads DESTROYING Aquille Carr. Basically calling every name in the book and why? Because he was 18 at the time?

Put up or shut up, liar.

Yes, I am calling you out.

Post the quotes where I DESTROYED him or called him every name in "the book."

A simple search on the this forum will either back up your accusation post, or expose you as a liar.

Now do it, you little hyper POS.

What an embarrassment you are to everyone at Gilman, and yes, I know who you are and yes, they ARE laughing at you behind your back.

Pathetic loser.

[GREYHOUND ALUM]

Put up or shut up, liar.

Yes, I am calling you out.

Post the quotes where I DESTROYED him or called him every name in "the book."

A simple search on the this forum will either back up your accusation post, or expose you as a liar.

Now do it, you little hyper POS.

What an embarrassment you are to everyone at Gilman, and yes, I know who you are and yes, they ARE laughing at you behind your back.

Pathetic loser.

I normally don't respond to you clown or do searches because I don't take this board seriously but just had to do this. Now back to ignoring you stalker troll.







"This young man's life appears to be in chaos.

Whoever is advising him is not doing him any favors.

Foolishness, indeed."



Aquille Carr will wait until spring to sign with Seton Hall

Quote:
Nine Baltimore-area boys basketball players are committed to Division I programs, but at least one won't sign during the fall period, which begins Wednesday.

Former Patterson guard Aquille Carr doesn't plan to sign with Seton Hall during the week-long signing period, according to his high school coach. Is the two-time Baltimore Sun All-Metro Player of the Year still committed to the Pirates?

"This can't be good. This has "train wreck" written all over it."



I'm sure Seton Hall will be proud to have a player who thought it necessary to (allegedly) throw the mother of his child to the ground and kick her while she was down.

Yes, kick her.

An 18-year old adult male kicking a female while she was on the ground.

Allegedly.

Quote:
Carr, 18, a 5-foot-6 point guard who was The Baltimore Sun's two-time All-Metro Player of the Year, is accused of throwing his former girlfriend to the ground outside a Southeast Baltimore trade school and kicking and punching her, records show.
Allegedly.

[Jeebus]

I normally don't respond to you clown or do searches because I don't take this board seriously but just had to do this. Now back to ignoring you stalker troll.







"This young man's life appears to be in chaos.

Whoever is advising him is not doing him any favors.

Foolishness, indeed."



Aquille Carr will wait until spring to sign with Seton Hall

Quote:
Nine Baltimore-area boys basketball players are committed to Division I programs, but at least one won't sign during the fall period, which begins Wednesday.

Former Patterson guard Aquille Carr doesn't plan to sign with Seton Hall during the week-long signing period, according to his high school coach. Is the two-time Baltimore Sun All-Metro Player of the Year still committed to the Pirates?

"This can't be good. This has "train wreck" written all over it."



I'm sure Seton Hall will be proud to have a player who thought it necessary to (allegedly) throw the mother of his child to the ground and kick her while she was down.

Yes, kick her.

An 18-year old adult male kicking a female while she was on the ground.

Allegedly.

Quote:
Carr, 18, a 5-foot-6 point guard who was The Baltimore Sun's two-time All-Metro Player of the Year, is accused of throwing his former girlfriend to the ground outside a Southeast Baltimore trade school and kicking and punching her, records show.
Allegedly.

Now point out where I DESTROYED him with comments I made.

(lol, posting published newspaper articles that were written by the Baltimore Sun)

Not even close to the level of derogatory comments you make.

Still waiting, clown.

[hssports]

So not only are you the board judge and jury but now also a child psychologist! Oh ok I see now.

Why don't you campaign to have the while board taken down because you're afraid of that it hurts a kids "psyche!" I think it's funny that you conviently place say 13-17 year old kids. Why not 18 year olds? Since many 12th grade players are 18(and older). You are the biggest hypocrite on this board besides jeebus. You rode right along with jeebus on many threads DESTROYING Aquille Carr. Basically calling every name in the book and why? Because he was 18 at the time? Well the GC kicker I spoke about is also 18. Constantly berating a team and school like you do with Dunbar does nothing to their psyche does it?

Save the BS dude and push your fake a s s agenda somewhere else. Back to ignoring you again.

The GC kicker you spoke of is NOT 18 - he is listed on their web site as a SOPHOMORE. Another falsehood and embarrassment to Gilman!!!

[hssports]

Part II ? , We went past part II, years ago ! !

We're into our fifth season with this particular troll. This little routine about "degrading" players is actually a re-run.

I have LOL-ed enough times to make those around me consider calling the white coats.

If you want entertainment, go to the archives and search through the GA fools 8500 posts; maybe you can find posts from the airport in England fussing with CHC after their game with G.Prep 1. [Obsession is too mild a word for this dude].

Search for keywords "resume" and you might get an amusing series where he was bragging about his accomplishments (in life); not on the football field.

There was a classic post last year which depicted him and his son, at home, reflecting on the Turkey Bowl; which, of course, has nada to do with Gilman.

Forget WWE, we've passed SNL, Carson, and looking to go right past #1 I Love Lucy.

8500 POST??????? ha ha ha....someone needs to seek therapy....

[GREYHOUND ALUM]

The GC kicker you spoke of is NOT 18 - he is listed on their web site as a SOPHOMORE. Another falsehood and embarrassment to Gilman!!!

You missed the point but I would expect nothing less from someone like you who has obvious comprehension issues. The point was what's the difference in talking about ANY KID in high school. It's a big difference in talking about a kid and a crime that he or she had yet been convicted, than calling a kid slow. But carry on with you're fake agenda, take my word for it. You don't want to be lumped in with that troll group, quite a few have been run off the board before. Don't be the next victim.

Strittmatter is a sophomore, I got him confused with his brother who graduated this year.

[GREYHOUND ALUM]

Wow, I'm sure that breaks his heart. You can't handle the truth! ha ha You most certainly denigrated GC OL. Stating that they were all bad except for one player. You most certainly lie and reflect poorly as a supporter of a great academic school like Gilman.

Now you can't say a line isn't good? Dude you need to save the BS. The more you talk, the more it becomes obvious who you are. Why don't you man up and PM me instead of following me around the board. Stop being a coward, you have an issue we can handle it like men. Because I am pretty sure I know who you are!

[Outside Looking In]

So not only are you the board judge and jury but now also a child psychologist! Oh ok I see now.

Why don't you campaign to have the while board taken down because you're afraid of that it hurts a kids "psyche!" I think it's funny that you conviently place say 13-17 year old kids. Why not 18 year olds? Since many 12th grade players are 18(and older). You are the biggest hypocrite on this board besides jeebus. You rode right along with jeebus on many threads DESTROYING Aquille Carr. Basically calling every name in the book and why? Because he was 18 at the time? Well the GC kicker I spoke about is also 18. Constantly berating a team and school like you do with Dunbar does nothing to their psyche does it?

Save the BS dude and push your fake a s s agenda somewhere else. Back to ignoring you again.

Look clown, most kids are 17 in their senior season of football. But yes 18 year olds play as well. Some students are 18 while playing. But keep on lieing to yourself and rationalize like you did to continue to bust up a kids reputation to make the almighty Gilman seem better.

Your son must be so proud of his 8500 post on a high-school message board father. I cannot believe you post on here that much about Gilman when your kid goes there. You are definitley one of "those" dads.

[harcohorns]

If were done bashing each other I will stick my nose in here... Gilman dropped to 64 from 59.. Bosco to 78 ... Bosco plays Bergen this week and may lose again which may drop them from the top 100... I know i said I would wait till the end of season to bring this debate back up with GA,,, but GA said St Thomas and Bosco were top 50 teams and well like I said they are not... even if Bosco wins this week they are not.. The truth about Bosco is they are not a top 50 team and wont be even if they beat Bergen and will be lucky if they are top 100 because I have Bergen winning this one... Gilman is not top 50 either... regardless what Moeller does because well they lost to Moeller... is what it is.. Gilman IS a top 100 team but not top 50... and that is that... Now as far as is Gilman better than Dematha or the 3a or 4a Md state champ that is debatable...but I will always take an undefeated champion over a 2 loss 6 team league champion .. just my opinion because it is much harder to win a state championship over 16 teams than it is a league championship over 5 other teams that you played in the regulars season... If Gilman was undefeated I would take them over a 14-0 state champ but not with two losses assuming the state champ is undefeated... its only right.. I might even put a undefeated 4A state champ over GC because GC is not as good as last year at all... As a whole Md privates are down this year... Like others state its about team and not individuals and how many offers a team has.. As far as I am concerned Gilman and Good Counsel underperformed with the amount of D1 offered kids they have,, but again D1 kids are a subjective argument...

[GREYHOUND ALUM]

If were done bashing each other I will stick my nose in here... Gilman dropped to 64 from 59.. Bosco to 78 ... Bosco plays Bergen this week and may lose again which may drop them from the top 100... I know i said I would wait till the end of season to bring this debate back up with GA,,, but GA said St Thomas and Bosco were top 50 teams and well like I said they are not... even if Bosco wins this week they are not.. The truth about Bosco is they are not a top 50 team and wont be even if they beat Bergen and will be lucky if they are top 100 because I have Bergen winning this one... Gilman is not top 50 either... regardless what Moeller does because well they lost to Moeller... is what it is.. Gilman IS a top 100 team but not top 50... and that is that... Now as far as is Gilman better than Dematha or the 3a or 4a Md state champ that is debatable...but I will always take an undefeated champion over a 2 loss 6 team league champion .. just my opinion because it is much harder to win a state championship over 16 teams than it is a league championship over 5 other teams that you played in the regulars season... If Gilman was undefeated I would take them over a 14-0 state champ but not with two losses assuming the state champ is undefeated... its only right.. I might even put a undefeated 4A state champ over GC because GC is not as good as last year at all... As a whole Md privates are down this year... Like others state its about team and not individuals and how many offers a team has.. As far as I am concerned Gilman and Good Counsel underperformed with the amount of D1 offered kids they have,, but again D1 kids are a subjective argument...

Gilman dropped in Rivals and rose one spot in USA Today to 22nd in the country. Now I don't believe they should be ranked that high(GC rose as well).

Like I have said to you before, there's more parity with the elite teams in the country. The best team I saw all year was Grayson out of Gerorgia. They are now out of States and ends the year with 2 losses. Aquinas is still in the thick of Florida States, their story is yet to be written.

Bosco still can go on and win the Non Public State Chanpionship. Will they be top 50, maybe not in Rivals. It's all under interpretation.

I disagree with you wholeheartedly about GC and Gilman underachieving. Who did they lose to that they shouldn't have? I can say that Gilman should have beaten GC. Obviously with Gulman's offense, they weren't ready for a team of Moeller's caliber. But Moeller IS A TOP 25 team nationally and how many losses don they have? So you can't make blanket statements like you do.

I told what Gilman feels about the state rankings. They could care less.

[harcohorns]

Get a Gilman coach to get on here and tell us they dont care about state rankings we might believe you.. That is just your opinion.. Gilman and Good Counsel underperformed because they should have beat teams by much more with all those D1 kids,,, again I harken back to your words when you said... ECA should blow everyone out on their schedule based on D1 offered kids or it would be an embarrassment to Md..(keeping it about football and the team and not about politics and what happened to their schedule) ,,, Well as it turns out Gilman has just as many and THEY should have blown out Bosco (only one D1 offered kid) to Gilmans dozen or so. Same with GC all those offered kids but struggled with team with much less See the point is you cant have it both ways. I think team unity has been sacrificed for the individual and "getting offers" as well recruiting kids in that haven't paid there due with the team. No loyalty is a problem... so I say underachieved based on D1 kids on roster...Not a point of whether they lost or not but games that were close that should not have been.. Now that said I am just making an argument based on your words.. I personally dont believe how many D1 kids you have means squat ... A good TEAM is a good team.. but also it depends on the focus of the program .. If the focus is kids in college than that is what matters most.. BUT again when I said that about ECA you said nothing matters to you but winning and put us down... now you want to sing that tune for Gilman.. That is the reason so many folks tire of your hypocrisy because you change your tune to what fits whatever argument you are in... dude just be real....

[GREYHOUND ALUM]

Get a Gilman coach to get on here and tell us they dont care about state rankings we might believe you.. That is just your opinion.. Gilman and Good Counsel underperformed because they should have beat teams by much more with all those D1 kids,,, again I harken back to your words when you said... ECA should blow everyone out on their schedule based on D1 offered kids or it would be an embarrassment to Md..(keeping it about football and the team and not about politics and what happened to their schedule) ,,, Well as it turns out Gilman has just as many and THEY should have blown out Bosco (only one D1 offered kid) to Gilmans dozen or so. Same with GC all those offered kids but struggled with team with much less See the point is you cant have it both ways. so I say underachieved based on D1 kids on roster...Not a point of whether they lost or not but games that were close that should not have been.. Now that said I am just making an argument based on your words.. I personally dont believe how many D1 kids you have means squat ... A good TEAM is a good team.. but also it depends on the focus of the program .. If the focus is kids in college than that is what matters most.. BUT again when I said that about ECA you said nothing matters to you but winning and put us down... now you want to sing that tune for Gilman.. That is the reason so many folks tire of your hypocrisy because you change your tune to what fits whatever argument you are in... dude just be real....

What hypocrisy? What the f u c k are you talking about? Nothing you just said made any sense. Have I changed my tune about all that matters is winning? I said ECA wasn't that good not because of their D1 athletes just because I thought they were overrated after I saw GC stomp a hole in them. I said I didn't see all those supposed D1 athletes. I said the same thing about CHC.

Now you're holding the ECA flag again? Talk about hypocrisy! Please don't go there with me! Show me anywhere where I changed up anything! If there's anything about me, I'm consistent! You might not agree with it but I don't change s h i t EVER. In fact I take serious offense to that.

Do you know any Gilman coaches? Do you know the AD? You know Poggi? Well I do and no they don't care about state rankings. Am I saying that they don't want to be #1 in the State, of course that's not what I'm saying. But if they aren't #1 and not beating GC, where they fall after that really means nothing to them! Who remember who was second or third in the state 10 years from now?

Now back to your statement about you believe that Gilman should have won by more in games this year. Here are the Gilman scores and you tell me what games they should have won by more besides Bosco.


Gilman 13 Bosco-6(tell me the last time Bosco was blown out)

Gilman 37 Charlotte Christian 14(was 37-7 with starters in)

Gilman 37 MSJ 7(Gilman was winning 37-0 until last 30 secs of game)

Gilman 49 Spalding 2(Gilman was winning 49-0 at beginning of 2nd quarter and starters out)


Gilman 47 Loyola 7(running clock and Loyola only scored on a INT)


Gilman 24 CHC 14(Gilman ran clock down with ball on 4 yard line and the ball)


Gilman 48 McDonogh 12(another running clock)

Gilman 20 McDonogh 8(McDonogh scored on a block punt)

Gilman 35 CHC 7(CHC didn't score until 4th quarter and game over)

Only game here where I believe the score should have been higher would be the first CHC game. McDonogh played a great second game.

[hssports]

Now you can't say a line isn't good? Dude you need to save the BS. The more you talk, the more it becomes obvious who you are. Why don't you man up and PM me instead of following me around the board. Stop being a coward, you have an issue we can handle it like men. Because I am pretty sure I know who you are!

Sorry, I don't know who you are and have really no interest in meeting you. It isn't personal but I just call it like I see it. I stand by my original opinion that offended you: RH or Wise or DM could easily be considered #2 - have to wait and see how it shakes out!

[GREYHOUND ALUM]

Sorry, I don't know who you are and have really no interest in meeting you. It isn't personal but I just call it like I see it. I stand by my original opinion that offended you: RH or Wise or DM could easily be considered #2 - have to wait and see how it shakes out!

Didn't offend me and I actually respect your opinion. Nothing wrong with disagreeing.