I'm not sure that will be the case with this incident ms maggie, because with so many people involved and the Republicans turning the incident into a public circus it is going to be very difficult for anybody to cover this one up.
Because the cat is already out of the bag that this was a CIA Operation, there really isn't anything to cover up except what the CIA clandestine operations were and what Ambassador Stevens involvement was.
My guess is that we will probably get a sanitised version of the events, something along the lines that the CIA, with the knowledge and blessing of the Libyan Government were involved in cleaning up Libya in general and the Benghazi area in particular of weapons left over from the Qaddafi regime. And if that was the case (and we will probably never know for certain) omitting that rather than destroying those weapons we were shipping them off to Turkey to be given to the opposition forces in Syria to help with their fight against the Syrian government.
They will probably explain the role of Ambassador Stevens as the go between the CIA operations and the Libyan government and that Stevens was just unlucky to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. If in fact they tell us that much.![]()
Last edited by Byng; 11-28-2012 at 09:33 AM.
Are you trying not to understand? The Ambassador had all of the security he needed to conduct his job at the Embassy in Tripoli, including but not limited to United States Marines.
Once he leaves that security then he becomes responsible for his own security through the host country, for any trips outside of the Embassy that he chooses to make. We are guests in the country, not occupiers and as such we cant just deploy security forces anywhere our little heart desires and especially in Benghazi at a Consulate we have vacated! Why chance losing American lives to defend bricks and mortar that we are officially not using anymore?
Host country security? Does this include local militias? Wouldn't that be like assigning one of our own home grown good ol' boy militia groups to protect an Ambassador from another country when they leave the Washington area? And if a State Department security supervisor assigned to the Benghazi area places a request for extending military security forces already present, because he placed concerns regarding the local militia not being probably trained to do the job, should his concerns be ignored? If you haven't watched the C-SPAN investigation already, you should so you and I can be on the same page with this.
Let us try this one more time!
Let us accept for the sake of argument that the State Departments requests for extra security were as you say, "turned down". Obviously, whether that decision was right or wrong, Ambassador Stevens, our head man and decision maker made the right decision and vacated the Benghazi Consulate and moved all State Department employees to the heavily fortified and American defended (at least from the inside) Embassy in Tripoli.
So we now have an empty piece of real estate in Benghazi so in consequence, nothing to defend. Obviously we don't want it vandalised and looted (or though any classified information was long since removed). So the Libyan Government subcontracted security to a local militia to pull the flag up once a day and water the plants and take care of the landscaping.
And the rest I have tried to answer for you in my previous posts.
I have to chuckle at you mentioning C-Span, public media, as your source because all I hear from the right is that 'public media' is so biased to the left, but the minute it suits your case to reference it, it becomes the source of all truth and the font of all wisdom!![]()
[QUOTE=Byng;8207737]Let us try this one more time!
Let us accept for the sake of argument that the State Departments requests for extra security were as you say, "turned down".
C-SPAN provides no opinionated commentary. Strictly recording and broadcasting. It is neutral. And if you would watch the investigation you would see exactly who were the two very competent security supervisors who did in fact request an extension twice and were turned down twice. One of the guys may have lost his job in Benghazi for refusing to orders not to request it again. But he did, and more forcefully. So again, until you watch this program so we can at least find common ground on the lack of quality security prior to the attack, we should just discontinue this debate. And surprise surprise, I like C-SPAN programming. Hope that doesn't disappoint you in anyway. No one can always be correct in their assumptions, right?
[quote=flyboy56;8207746]The last time I checked, the responsibility for security in Libya and the person that makes all of the decisions on the ground in Libya, is our Ambassador in Libya not two "security supervisors" or anybody else. I don't think I need to post a link for that, do I?![]()
[quote=flyboy56;8207763]We finally agree, and hopefully the many investigations being conducted, none more-so than the State Department investigation led by Admiral Mullen our retired and well respected, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a retired Senior State Department Diplomat and former Ambassador (who's name escapes me) will provide us the answers we are looking for.
And for all of those posters still trashing Secretary of State Clinton for not appearing on TV to explain herself, as Secretary Of State it is her job to present the results of that investigation into Benghazi to the United States Congress in its entirety. Secretary Clinton has stated that she fully intends to do that and will not stand down as Secretary of State until that responsibility has been completed.
Christ almighty here we go again with James Bond. Did Bond in any of Flemings novels wind up a real estate broker in Delaware? The US Ambassador was not a special agent or member of any special forces team. He and his staff were asking for additional protection at least a month before he was killed. There was a Marine Force Recon unit in Sigonella on stand by that could have been airlifted to Libya within two hours of the attack, five hours before those men were killed. The cowardly towel heads would have taken off at the first sight of them
Then explain to us all Omaha Beach what exactly it was that Ambassador Stevens was doing in a weeks earlier vacated Consulate with no security and a bunch of undercover CIA Operatives posing as State Department employees and conducting clandestine operations? We are all waiting with baited breath for your insight and wisdom!![]()
...........still waiting with baited breath, for your insight and wisdom, Omaha Beach?![]()
|
| Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv | Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278 |