Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Please explain why 4th&29 converts and 4th&inches fails

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    883

    Default Please explain why 4th&29 converts and 4th&inches fails

    thanks!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,377

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by baltiMOREO&R View Post
    thanks!
    Two years ago, a similar play occurred with the same result...

    Billick was the color man in the booth and to boil his speech down to the basics, with less than a yard to go, the QB should not turn his back on the LOS to hand off 5 yds behind the LOS...

    4th and inches was the same as 4th and 5 in this case.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Severna Park, MD
    Posts
    92

    Default

    I sure can't explain it. SD had a 4th and inches in the first half. Handed it off and the RB squirted reall low over the bodies of his O linemen who were practically on their bellies. He got the first down.

    The Ravens just can't seem to execute and the poor O line play for 3.5 quarters was exemplified by that play. There was also an important 3rd and 1 in the first half. Ravens line up in bunch formation with the D totally ready for a run. The Ravens hand off to Rice up the middle and he's tackled for a loss. Why the hell are you not changing the play and spreading them out at that point. There was no crowd noise in a half empty stadium with 20K Ravens fans among them.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,377

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyUrulz View Post
    I sure can't explain it. SD had a 4th and inches in the first half. Handed it off and the RB squirted reall low over the bodies of his O linemen who were practically on their bellies. He got the first down.

    The Ravens just can't seem to execute and the poor O line play for 3.5 quarters was exemplified by that play. There was also an important 3rd and 1 in the first half. Ravens line up in bunch formation with the D totally ready for a run. The Ravens hand off to Rice up the middle and he's tackled for a loss. Why the hell are you not changing the play and spreading them out at that point. There was no crowd noise in a half empty stadium with 20K Ravens fans among them.
    On the SD play, Rivers just turned and stuck the ball into the runner's gut as he was charging the LOS. Flacco actually ran backwards and was 5 yds from the LOS when the ball was handed off to Pierce.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Severna Park, MD
    Posts
    92

    Default

    So is that poor play calling or poor execution. You'd almost want to see a QB sneak but we've seen Flacco get stuffed on those too. A prominent case was in New England 2 seasons ago (Flacco stuffed on 4th and an inch).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,377

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyUrulz View Post
    So is that poor play calling or poor execution. You'd almost want to see a QB sneak but we've seen Flacco get stuffed on those too. A prominent case was in New England 2 seasons ago (Flacco stuffed on 4th and an inch).
    It was both poor play calling and execution.

    When Ditka was HC of the Bears in 1983 (da Beahs!), he tried a fancy play but got a memo from a retired George Halas telling him the QB sneak is still the most efficient play - no handoffs, the ball stays at the LOS, etc.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by baltiMOREO&R View Post
    thanks!
    4th and inches, 11 guys piled on the line. 4th and 29, linebackers are 15 yards deep, defensive backs are 20 yards deep which leaves lots of space in between

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Overlea/Fullerton MD
    Posts
    4,759

    Default

    The Ravens O line has issues getting off the ball and pushing a D line backwards.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Shire, Eriador, Middle Earth
    Posts
    2,202

    Default

    On the 4th and inches it looked like Flacco changed the play call at the line of scrimmage, maybe seeing to much beef in the middle, and I think that was a mistake. The Ravens were having some success up the middle, but trying to go around the side was just too slow developing.

    On the 4th and 29, frankly we got lucky and got an incredibly gutsy play out of Ray Rice. There were not a lot of other options at that point, but if you're going to fail, you at least want to put the ball in the hands of your best player and hope he makes a play, which he certainly did.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Severna Park, MD
    Posts
    92

    Default

    My problem is this:

    There should never even have been a 4th and 29. The Ravens had a first down on a Flacco strike down the middle two plays prior (I beleive in FG range). The refs called Yanda for holding. HE DID NOT HOLD. Not even close. In fact he was beat and his man was steaming towards Flacco as Flacco threw (for the first down).

    Can't even imagine what the refs THOUGHT they saw. I know they "could call holding on every play". But obviously they don't, and by the way they DO call it there is no way Yanda held, even in a "could call it" scenario. So the whole palooza over the spot and moving the chains was effectively a make-up call whether intentional or not. No body is talking about this though.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Mason-Dixon Line USA
    Posts
    3,099

    Default Please explain why 4th&29 converts and 4th&inches fails

    It's easy. On 4th and inches, Ray Rice didn't get the ball. On 4th and 29, Ray Rice DID get the ball.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn, NYC (my heart will always be in Arlington, Va)
    Posts
    15,452

    Default

    The refs gave an extra yard on the 4th and 29.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    6,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peej7245 View Post
    It was both poor play calling and execution.

    When Ditka was HC of the Bears in 1983 (da Beahs!), he tried a fancy play but got a memo from a retired George Halas telling him the QB sneak is still the most efficient play - no handoffs, the ball stays at the LOS, etc.
    I wonder what Cam called before Joe audibles out of his play?

    Any of our expert o coordinator analysts have any 'insight' ?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Baltimore: Raven Nation Army Strong
    Posts
    12,361

    Default

    Luck. Pure and simple.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    6,267

    Default

    That's football!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Eclectic Alabama
    Posts
    14,386

    Default

    I can explain it. Boldin made that key block that allowed Ray to go the final 10 yards or so for the 1st down!!!!!!!!! That was key. If he doesn't make that block, Ray comes up 10 yards short.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ravenation
    Posts
    19,860

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by baltiMOREO&R View Post
    thanks!
    That's easy. Cam was willing to let Rice have the ball on 4th and 29.
    But on 4th and inches he thinks it's better with Ray sitting on the bench.

    Cam also thinks it's better to do a QB sneak when it's 3rd and a loooong 1 with Flacco just closing his eyes and pushing forward and then on 4th and inches run a slow developing handoff to a 3rd string runnung back.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Glen Burnie,Md USA
    Posts
    15,275

    Default

    Maybe the defense had something to do with it?
    I'm not that schooled deep in the game like a lot of folks here, but I wonder if the SD defense just concentrated too much on deep coverage and left the short/underneath middle not adequately protected? If I was the opposition coach, I would have a defender in Rice's back pocket on every play.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    170

    Default

    On the 4th and inches Flacco changed the play at the line to the right side when the the team was jumbo package to the left on the 4 and 29 he simply gave it to the best player on the team.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rave-O View Post
    On the 4th and inches Flacco changed the play at the line to the right side when the the team was jumbo package to the left on the 4 and 29 he simply gave it to the best player on the team.
    On the 4th and inches play, it's worth watching Michael Oher's contribution (or lack thereof). "1 Winning Drive" highlights that play in the replay package this week. Just looking at how it was blocked, it makes me think that the point of the shift might have been to set up the run as a cut-back to the left behind the "jumbos". The right side gets pushed back a hair but seems to put helmets on helmets. The left side did a decent job getting some push. Except for Oher. He actually flinched before everyone else (maybe early), you can see it clearly on the show. Then he just gets smoked off the snap by his guy, who proceeds to then make the tackle. He needed to get over to seal Liuget off, and didn't even come close. He flinched at the worst possible time, then got caught "stopping himself" when the actual snap was made. That left him flat footed, while Liuget was virtually untouched.

    If Oher just battles him to a draw, there was plenty of space for Pierce to cut back and pick up the first down... and probably several more yards. But Oher did virtually nothing on the play. In all honesty, the play would have looked exactly the same if Oher hadn't even been on the field and they ran it with 10 men.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278