Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 170

Thread: Bigfoot/Sasquatch Proven A Human Hybrid Via DNA Study

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,973

    Default Bigfoot/Sasquatch Proven A Human Hybrid Via DNA Study

    BREAKING NEWS:

    http://www.dnadiagnostics.com/press.html


    I am no geneticist but in layman's terms it seems like the Bigfoot or Sasquatch is a hybrid human that occurred when a human male variant mated with a homo sapiens woman over 15,000 years ago. Sort of like a zebra mating with a horse or a tiger with a lion. This is why apparently they are so smart and able to avoid detection so well. Scientific proof they exist once and for all other than the Patterson Gimlin film.

    (No, this story did not come from "The Onion." It is legit.
    Last edited by Baltimore Ravens Lets Go!; 11-28-2012 at 08:50 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Drive for show, putt for eight.
    Posts
    36,042

    Default

    Sasquatch DNA? Yeah, ok. Where did they get this "DNA"?


    here?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Baltiless
    Posts
    7,534

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baltimore Ravens Lets Go! View Post
    It is legit.
    I lol'd.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Norman View Post
    Sasquatch DNA? Yeah, ok. Where did they get this "DNA"?


    here?
    That was funny. Supposedly they got the DNA from a variety of samples including, hair, saliva, blood, a toenail, a tooth and an actual chunk of flesh or tissue.
    Last edited by Baltimore Ravens Lets Go!; 11-28-2012 at 09:58 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,475

    Default

    I once saw a Sasquatch feeding..............then as it left Golden Corral the kids became frightened and asked what is it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Norman View Post
    Sasquatch DNA? Yeah, ok. Where did they get this "DNA"?


    here?
    http://www.click2houston.com/news/Do...b/-/index.html

    Here is a link to a video where the sample types are explained by the person who was in charge of the analysis, Dr. Melba Ketchum.

    I like how some folks are laughing about this but they may soon have egg on their face as the data and testing results are published. This was a big project spanning five years with the Russians even involved.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skeemer View Post
    I lol'd.
    See the link I posted on post before this one, where the head of the DNA analysis, Dr. Melba Ketchum, talks about the five year project and all the testing they did if you think this is a joke.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Baltiless
    Posts
    7,534

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baltimore Ravens Lets Go! View Post
    See the link I posted on post before this one, where the head of the DNA analysis, Dr. Melba Ketchum, talks about the five year project and all the testing they did if you think this is a joke.
    I will happily admit to having egg all over my body (slathered, if you will) if this turns out to be true. Until that time, I will continue to lol.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skeemer View Post
    I will happily admit to having egg all over my body (slathered, if you will) if this turns out to be true. Until that time, I will continue to lol.
    Sure, I understand, as will likely the majority of folks, but did you watch the video?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    24,178

    Default


    Where's the Beef

    Any proof?
    It's a fascinating theory.

    So where's the evidence? Well, there is none. Not yet, anyway: Ketchum's research has not appeared in any peer-reviewed scientific journal, and there's no indication when that might happen. If the data are good and the science is sound, any reputable science journal would jump at the chance to be the first to publish this groundbreaking information. Until then, Ketchum has refused to let anyone else see her evidence.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshan Man View Post
    Time will tell is all we know at this point. However, have you ever watched the show "Finding Bigfoot" on Animal Planet? How can all those eyewitness including many law enforcement people, Park Rangers, Hunting Guides, hunters, fishermen, campers, and people driving remote roads, be seeing these things, if they don't exist? Are they all hallucinating or cannot tell the difference between a bear and a hairly bi-ped?
    Last edited by Baltimore Ravens Lets Go!; 11-28-2012 at 10:55 AM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Baltiless
    Posts
    7,534

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baltimore Ravens Lets Go! View Post
    Time will tell is all we know at this point. However, have you ever watched the show "Finding Bigfoot" on Animal Planet? How can all those eyewitness including many law enforcement people be seeing these things?
    Just like UFOs, Nessie, etc.

    I watched the video but there wasn't anything new or earth-shaking in it. If/when she gets published and reviewed, we'll know more. Until then, this story is no different than UFO sightings.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skeemer View Post
    Just like UFOs, Nessie, etc.

    I watched the video but there wasn't anything new or earth-shaking in it. If/when she gets published and reviewed, we'll know more. Until then, this story is no different than UFO sightings.
    There have been thousands of sitings that have been documented all over North America in every state but Hawai. If even one of the sitings was true, than they exist. The odds are against thousands of sitings all being baloney, not to mention the casts, hair samples, and the PG film that has never been debunked scientifically by anyone. I don't know much about UFO's but I doubt they have DNA from aliens do they?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Baltiless
    Posts
    7,534

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baltimore Ravens Lets Go! View Post
    There have been thousands of sitings that have been documented all over North America in every state but Hawai. If even one of the sitings was true, than they exist. The odds are against thousands of sitings all being baloney, not to mention the casts, hair samples, and the PG film that has never been debunked scientifically by anyone. I don't know much about UFO's but I doubt they have DNA from aliens do they?
    With thousands of sightings, there would almost assuredly be bones, bodies, campsites, shelters, etc. found at some point.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skeemer View Post
    With thousands of sightings, there would almost assuredly be bones, bodies, campsites, shelters, etc. found at some point.
    They are believed to possibly bury their dead and if they are a form of human that makes sense. Also, there have been stick shelters and grass "nests" that have been found occasionally but they are also believed to spend time in caves.They reportedly have a language, as there is a Sierra Sounds recording that has been analyzed by a naval crypto linguistics experts, and they speak twice as rapidly as we do. So who knows, maybe they are more advanced then we are in some ways? All of this information is available if you do some searching on the Internet.

    There are dozens of Bigfoot sites and blogs. The BFRO (Bigfoot Research Organization) site has a data base of eyewitness reports and they interview the witnessess to determine if they are reliable or not before including in their data base. Native Americans have passed down stories of them as simply another "tribe" of giant hairy people. These things are well documented and not merely folklore.

    Documented sitings go back the the pioneer days. Daniel Boone reportedly shot one! He called it a Wahoo and described it as a giant hairy wild man. They are believed to live like nomads and migrate to different food sources at various times of the year and are primarily nocturnal. These factors are what makes them hard to detect.
    Last edited by Baltimore Ravens Lets Go!; 11-28-2012 at 11:00 AM.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,188

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baltimore Ravens Lets Go! View Post
    All of this information is available if you do some searching on the Internet.
    And we all know that you can't put it on the internet if it isn't true....

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Astute Reader(tm) View Post
    And we all know that you can't put it on the internet if it isn't true....
    Conversely, you can say that about mostly anything written anywhere at any time couldn't you?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,500

    Default

    Was flippin' through channels Sunday night and came across "Finding Bigfoot".

    One of the hosts was talking about how the area they were in, was rich in food like deer, for bigfoot to eat. Then he explains that deer as so used to humans that they mistake bigfoot for people and don't run away, giving bigfoot time throw a rock at upwards of 60 mph and kill it.

    I once saw what could have been a female bigfoot at the Ho Kown Chinese restaurant buffet. It appeared to really like sweet & sour chicken and shrimp.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,500

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baltimore Ravens Lets Go! View Post
    All of this information is available if you do some searching on the Internet.

    There are dozens of Bigfoot sites and blogs. The BFRO (Bigfoot Research Organization) site has a data base of eyewitness reports and they interview the witnessess to determine if they are reliable or not before including in their data base.
    Dude, on its website, the BFRO lists "The Legend of Boggy Creek" as a documentary.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wild Eyed Southern Boy View Post
    Dude, on its website, the BFRO lists "The Legend of Boggy Creek" as a documentary.
    I think that is a more recent version that is indeed a documentary of the incidents the famous original movie was based.The guy behind this site is an attorney, not some sort of yee hah guy from good ole Rocky Top like you. So he wouldn't be dumb enough to consider the original movie a "documentary." Although it certainly is based in fact.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278