Page 6 of 16 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 316

Thread: Wedding bells for same-sex couples; bye-bye domestic partnerships

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,249

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Haberdasher View Post
    One man and one woman being married for life is not normal.

    Why do they keep advocating for that? Why do they want to pretend it is normal when it is not?
    http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/.../why-men-cheat


    The distribution of oxytocin and arginine vasopressin receptors in the human brain reveals that we are a monogamous species. But is that socially monogamous or sexually monogamous? The large size of the male testicles and shape of the penis suggest that we evolved when females would have multiple sexual partners and it was a "let the best sperm win" all-out competition. We have socially monogamous brains but sexually promiscuous genitals.

    Adding testosterone to the mix is like having a wild card in poker--anything can happen. Testosterone is in conflict with the bonding effects of oxytocin (literally--testosterone inhibits the uptake of oxytocin by its receptor). It motivates men and women, but mostly men who have five to ten times more testosterone than the fairer sex, to seek more sexual partners (and to be single-minded and to take more risks). Testosterone levels also respond to our social environment. Win a chess match, your testosterone goes up. Earn a million dollar bonus at your hedge fund, your testosterone goes up. Win the Master's tournament, your testosterone soars.

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    How many hetero married couples stay married for life?
    I don't know but I didn't see that a majority was required in the defiinition of normal.

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    I don't know but I didn't see that a majority was required in the defiinition of normal.
    If it's not the majority , how can it be the norm?

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    If it's not the majority , how can it be the norm?
    Read the definition.

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    Read the definition.
    read it

    1. usual; regular; common; typical: the normal way of doing it ; the normal level
    So with hetero marriage it's common and typical for them to get married and divorced, not so common or typical to stay married for life. Glad we cleared that up with your definition

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    read it



    So with hetero marriage it's common and typical for them to get married and divorced, not so common or typical to stay married for life. Glad we cleared that up with your definition
    You can interpret in any way you want. How does gay marriage fit into your definition of normal then?

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    You can interpret in any way you want. How does gay marriage fit into your definition of normal then?
    Two people in love who want to share their life together and possibly raise a family. What's more normal than that?

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    Two people in love who want to share their life together and possibly raise a family. What's more normal than that?
    Then that would contradict your previous post saying that heterosexual marriage for life is not normal.

    Newspeak?

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    Then that would contradict your previous post saying that heterosexual marriage for life is not normal.

    Newspeak?
    There's nothing contradictory at all. I said it's not normal for heteros to be married for life, where did I say in my answer to your question that it's normal for anyone to be married for life. I think you need to reread my post

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    There's nothing contradictory at all. I said it's not normal for heteros to be married for life, where did I say in my answer to your question that it's normal for anyone to be married for life. I think you need to reread my post
    Where did you see that I said you said that it is normal for anyone to be married for life?

  11. #111
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    Where did you see that I said you said that it is normal for anyone to be married for life?
    You said my post was contradictory, you haven't shown how. The numbers show that it's not normal for heteros to be married for life

  12. #112
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    You said my post was contradictory, you haven't shown how. The numbers show that it's not normal for heteros to be married for life
    The defintion of normal does not require it to be a majority and if it did then gay marriage or even being gay wouldn't be normal for that matter. You can't have it both ways.

  13. #113
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,179

    Default

    We can agree to disagree. feel free to have the last word

  14. #114
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    We can agree to disagree. feel free to have the last word
    I accept your surrender.

  15. #115
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    24,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    The defintion of normal does not require it to be a majority and if it did then gay marriage or even being gay wouldn't be normal for that matter. You can't have it both ways.
    Bottom line: "Normal" is in the eye of the beholder, and many Americans - perhaps a majority - have now "normalized" homosexuality... just as they normalized left-handedness a few generations ago.

  16. #116
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by regularguy View Post
    Bottom line: "Normal" is in the eye of the beholder, and many Americans - perhaps a majority - have now "normalized" homosexuality... just as they normalized left-handedness a few generations ago.
    And interracial relationships and reality tv

  17. #117
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by regularguy View Post
    Bottom line: "Normal" is in the eye of the beholder, and many Americans - perhaps a majority - have now "normalized" homosexuality... just as they normalized left-handedness a few generations ago.
    Thats fine and you are right it is up to each individual what they believe is normal. Just don't be upset that not everyone will see what you want to believe as being normal as normal in their eyes.

  18. #118
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Towson
    Posts
    3,978

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    Thats fine and you are right it is up to each individual what they believe is normal. Just don't be upset that not everyone will see what you want to believe as being normal as normal in their eyes.
    So if you agree that it is up to the individual to believe what is normal why are you so afraid of the media trying to "normalize" you as you have posted numerous times in this thread. Is your sexuality so fragile that you are afraid that watching 30 minutes of Glee will have you googling hardcore male on male pron?

  19. #119
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    24,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    Thats fine and you are right it is up to each individual what they believe is normal. Just don't be upset that not everyone will see what you want to believe as being normal as normal in their eyes.
    You expect me to be upset that not everyone agrees with me? That would be irrational and immature. But I am glad that a majority agrees with me.

  20. #120
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oriole-Bob View Post
    So if you agree that it is up to the individual to believe what is normal why are you so afraid of the media trying to "normalize" you as you have posted numerous times in this thread. Is your sexuality so fragile that you are afraid that watching 30 minutes of Glee will have you googling hardcore male on male pron?
    No as someone who is inherently defiant my objection is to the coercive nature of this "normalization". It would be the same for any thing that is "forced" like that with me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278