Page 8 of 16 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 160 of 316

Thread: Wedding bells for same-sex couples; bye-bye domestic partnerships

  1. #141
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    How many hetero married couples stay together for life?
    and more help shows up

  2. #142
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,096

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    I must have missed it. Exactly what was his marriage about?
    I must have missed that too. I don't know what she is talking about. She has been stalking me on this board for quite a while now and tries to make everything personal and about me. I think she has "issues" with me for some reason.

  3. #143
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by durango46 View Post
    and more help shows up
    Yet you have no answer?

  4. #144
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    21,373

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    Is that what you think I am doing? Like I said I don't like to be "coerced" into anything. If that is acting like a bigot then so be it. I would rather be that then a pathetic sheep that goes along with anything they are led to believe. I never said I objected to civil unions did I? Go peddle your PC crap to someone who cares.
    Whether or not gay marriages are allowed to exist, it doesn't affect you. You can call them "civil unions" until you turn blue, but everyone else will call them "marriages."

    Are you equally as offended when marriage is used to describe other kinds of unions, such as a "marriage between philosophy and psychology"? Or are you offended only when the term is applied only to two people of the same sex?

    Btw, you've posted enough on this thread, so it appears that you DO care.

  5. #145
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    If it's not the majority , how can it be the norm?
    it's suppose to be the norm and you know it....

    why bother with this conversation because it's ALL about the defense of same sex MARRIAGES which I will never agree with...


    so make all the points you like........

    man + woman = children THE NORM
    without that equation we all become extinct


    enjoy

  6. #146
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    Two people in love who want to share their life together and possibly raise a family. What's more normal than that?
    how do you raise a family without using heterosexuals to do so ? you know the norm

  7. #147
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    The defintion of normal does not require it to be a majority and if it did then gay marriage or even being gay wouldn't be normal for that matter. You can't have it both ways.
    you got him....

  8. #148
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    I know it might seem petty to you but I am extemely defiant. Using the term "marriage" as opposed to "civil unions" is a form of coercion to change the way people think.
    wasn't good enough for them

  9. #149
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,096

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yuca View Post
    Whether or not gay marriages are allowed to exist, it doesn't affect you. You can call them "civil unions" until you turn blue, but everyone else will call them "marriages."
    You don't comprehend very well do you? I am not going to even try to explain it again because it is pointless because you are determined to make me out to be something I am not.

    Are you equally as offended when marriage is used to describe other kinds of unions, such as a "marriage between philosophy and psychology"? Or are you offended only when the term is applied only to two people of the same sex?
    How many times to I have to tell you that I object to the coercive nature of the intent not the terms themselves?

    Btw, you've posted enough on this thread, so it appears that you DO care.
    Care about what?

    Newspeak, yes I do think that is something to be concerned about.

  10. #150
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    There, happy now?

    See, this is what I am talking about. You won't let me alone because I don't see things like you do. Too freaking bad.
    So, you agree that one man and one woman, married to each other for life, is not normal?

  11. #151
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,096

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Haberdasher View Post
    So, you agree that one man and one woman, married to each other for life, is not normal?
    No I don't agree.

  12. #152
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    15,546

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    I must have missed it. Exactly what was his marriage about?
    Linky

    He has long had issues with women on this forum and likes to play the victim and get all dramatic whenever someone dares question him about any position he takes.

    Just as this topic doesn't bother him and yet he's attempting to pontificate to others about what is normal and what is not.

    To me ~ a marriage is based on a mutual, loving, and willing relationship between two adults who want to be together.

    Viewing it as some kind of unwanted life sentence doesn't seem "normal" to me.

  13. #153
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by durango46 View Post
    how do you raise a family without using heterosexuals to do so ? you know the norm
    Are you really this dense?

  14. #154
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octoburn View Post
    Linky

    He has long had issues with women on this forum and likes to play the victim and get all dramatic whenever someone dares question him about any position he takes.

    Just as this topic doesn't bother him and yet he's attempting to pontificate to others about what is normal and what is not.

    To me ~ a marriage is based on a mutual, loving, and willing relationship between two adults who want to be together.

    Viewing it as some kind of unwanted life sentence doesn't seem "normal" to me.
    and that's fine after all you are entitled to your opinion as we are ours.

    I don't think it's an unwanted life sentence by any means. But I do believe that marriage is defined by a man and a woman. It's always been that way. It is the norm as accepted by most people up until NOW.

    I had no problem with using the terminology civil unions ( and I know that's my decision)...or whatever else they would choose. They would get all the benefits that a man and a woman have.

  15. #155
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    Are you really this dense?
    are you ?

  16. #156
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by durango46 View Post


    are you ?
    Can a hetero woman who can't bear children have a family?

  17. #157
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    so now it doesn't take a man and a woman to make a baby ?

    news to me...

    please enlighten me Saint Ken....

  18. #158
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by durango46 View Post
    so now it doesn't take a man and a woman to make a baby ?

    news to me...

    please enlighten me Saint Ken....
    Answer my question first, then I'll answer yours. Only fair

  19. #159
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    Can a hetero woman who can't bear children have a family?
    first you know the answer but I will play your little game
    normally....no...

    but, there are other alternatives that still involve a man and a woman in some way

  20. #160
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by durango46 View Post
    first you know the answer but I will play your little game
    normally....no...

    but, there are other alternatives that still involve a man and a woman
    Normally No is not an answer to what I asked you. It's a yes or no question. Try again

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278