View Poll Results: Do you like John Harbaugh?

Voters
31. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    20 64.52%
  • No

    11 35.48%
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 50

Thread: Do you like John Harbaugh

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,335

    Default

    The so called Wizard of Oz has to accept part of the blame for no SB. He keeps on signing so called receivers who continually drop passes in key games. Clayton a few years back in NE dropped one on NE 8 yard line, would have been winning drive. Hooshyour daddy couple years ago, fourth and ten drops a first down pass against Steelers on a drive that would have at least tied the game and then last year with Evans, the unkindest drop of all. Same, with now. Pitta and Boldin only sure handed receivers. Draft picks: Kindle, Dickson, Smith yuck!

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omaha Beach View Post
    The so called Wizard of Oz has to accept part of the blame for no SB. He keeps on signing so called receivers who continually drop passes in key games. Clayton a few years back in NE dropped one on NE 8 yard line, would have been winning drive. Hooshyour daddy couple years ago, fourth and ten drops a first down pass against Steelers on a drive that would have at least tied the game and then last year with Evans, the unkindest drop of all. Same, with now. Pitta and Boldin only sure handed receivers. Draft picks: Kindle, Dickson, Smith yuck!
    I would agree that Newsome has to take some responsibility for some very weak drafts as of late. Not sure I would include Boldin in that sure handed group. He's had quite a few drops this season and last.

    Poor drafting along with aging players and losing quality talent to only be replaced by cheaper cast offs from other teams has put the team in a difficult position.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,410

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TDL View Post
    I would agree that Newsome has to take some responsibility for some very weak drafts as of late. Not sure I would include Boldin in that sure handed group. He's had quite a few drops this season and last.

    Poor drafting along with aging players and losing quality talent to only be replaced by cheaper cast offs from other teams has put the team in a difficult position.
    Agree 100%. (I was going to make a comment on Boldin NOT being so sure handed, but you covered it already.)

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,335

    Default Do

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    Agree 100%. (I was going to make a comment on Boldin NOT being so sure handed, but you covered it already.)
    Who do they have at least at this point any better than Boldin?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,410

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omaha Beach View Post
    Who do they have at least at this point any better than Boldin?
    The only one I can think of is Doss. But he's used so sparingly, it's hard to tell for sure. But he's quicker than Boldin. And is supposed to have very sure hands; in any case, he can't have any WORSE hands than Boldin has displayed. Aside from some memorable game changing catches, Boldin, in my book, has either been a major non factor, or a definite disappointment. (However, he, like everyone else on the Ravens offensive side of the ball, has never been used to his strength, which is short slants that he then runs for YAC. I will at least acknowledge that much.)

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    The only one I can think of is Doss. But he's used so sparingly, it's hard to tell for sure. But he's quicker than Boldin. And is supposed to have very sure hands; in any case, he can't have any WORSE hands than Boldin has displayed. Aside from some memorable game changing catches, Boldin, in my book, has either been a major non factor, or a definite disappointment. (However, he, like everyone else on the Ravens offensive side of the ball, has never been used to his strength, which is short slants that he then runs for YAC. I will at least acknowledge that much.)
    There was some old guy in Arizona that used to throw short passes to Boldin and long passes to this other guy Larry. I think they did ok. I also think they didn't have anyone named Cam on the team.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,410

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    There was some old guy in Arizona that used to throw short passes to Boldin and long passes to this other guy Larry. I think they did ok. I also think they didn't have anyone named Cam on the team.
    True that. But even that was a long time ago. At least by NFL standards/in NFL years. The Ravens waited a year or two too long to bring in Boldin.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    True that. But even that was a long time ago. At least by NFL standards/in NFL years. The Ravens waited a year or two too long to bring in Boldin.
    That, and Flacco isn't Warner. Warner was the definition of elite as long as he had some protection.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,410

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    That, and Flacco isn't Warner. Warner was the definition of elite as long as he had some protection.
    Elite or not, I bet if you look at all the throws from Joe to Boldin, Boldin has dropped more passes than Joe has missed getting passes to Boldin.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    Elite or not, I bet if you look at all the throws from Joe to Boldin, Boldin has dropped more passes than Joe has missed getting passes to Boldin.
    That doesn't help either. If you look at the Ravens from a fantasy perspective, they haven't had a true #1 receiver in forever (Heap being the closest thing for a couple seasons). Remember when Travis Taylor was the "#1"?

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,410

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    That doesn't help either. If you look at the Ravens from a fantasy perspective, they haven't had a true #1 receiver in forever (Heap being the closest thing for a couple seasons). Remember when Travis Taylor was the "#1"?
    Yeah. I remember. And Ozzie Newsome STILL maintains that if Taylor had just had a FEW MORE YEARS with the Ravens, he'd have been great. Yeah, Ozzie. You go, guy!


  12. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    True that. But even that was a long time ago. At least by NFL standards/in NFL years. The Ravens waited a year or two too long to bring in Boldin.
    You do realize that if the Ravens had gotten him a year earlier (2009) he would have cost a lot more (1st, 3rd and players). Arizona wanted a ransom for him prior to the 2009 season. I do agree he is aging though but from a price standpoint (contract and draft picks) they were smart to get him when they got him.

    By the way I like Harbaugh (not super high on him) but would like him a lot more if he finally gets rid of Cameron.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,410

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SugarRay52 View Post
    You do realize that if the Ravens had gotten him a year earlier (2009) he would have cost a lot more (1st, 3rd and players). Arizona wanted a ransom for him prior to the 2009 season. I do agree he is aging though but from a price standpoint (contract and draft picks) they were smart to get him when they got him.

    By the way I like Harbaugh (not super high on him) but would like him a lot more if he finally gets rid of Cameron.
    As Ray Rice said...the Ravens pay who they want to pay. They overpaid for Suggs. They overpaid for Ngata. You can't have it both ways. Like Grubbs said: "The Ravens are all about the defense." And it shows. They waited to long for Boldin. And it cost them in other ways.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    West Chester Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,252

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    Nobody's even talking about the gutless way Harbaugh chose to end the 1st half against the Steelers. 32 seconds and 3 time outs left, and this chicken chit runs with his tail between his legs into the locker room after simply running out the clock. It's JUST LIKE BILLICK did in the game against the Colts. Exactly. They're both "play not to lose" coaches, and the results speak for themselves -- SEEMINGLY impressive w/l records (although Billick's is nowhere near as "impressive" as Harbaugh's), but gutless when it comes to the post season and/or playing against top level competition. Just like all their mentors -- Andy Reid, Marty, and Bo Schembechler.

    (Hey...I hear a satire song coming out of all of this: "Andy Reid, Marty, and Bo".)

    "facepalm"

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    West Chester Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,252

    Default

    John Harbaugh is a good coach. The team has been to the playoffs every year he has been coach. Now - he isn't playing, but he sets the tone and instilled discipline in the locker room at a time when it was sorely needed.
    Now at year 5, the natural lifespan of his tenure is likely closer to the end than the beginning. Most coaches don't last even 5 years these days. The message tens to get stale with the players. That said, I think he has been a positive for this team and look forward to his coaching them for the next few years.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,335

    Default Do

    Quote Originally Posted by West Chester Raven View Post
    John Harbaugh is a good coach. The team has been to the playoffs every year he has been coach. Now - he isn't playing, but he sets the tone and instilled discipline in the locker room at a time when it was sorely needed.
    Now at year 5, the natural lifespan of his tenure is likely closer to the end than the beginning. Most coaches don't last even 5 years these days. The message tens to get stale with the players. That said, I think he has been a positive for this team and look forward to his coaching them for the next few years.
    Too bad that so called locker room discipline does not carry over to the field. I do believe they are second most penalized team in NFL after Oakland. As far as 5 years and out tell that to the Patriots and Belechick!

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,335

    Default Do

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    As Ray Rice said...the Ravens pay who they want to pay. They overpaid for Suggs. They overpaid for Ngata. You can't have it both ways. Like Grubbs said: "The Ravens are all about the defense." And it shows. They waited to long for Boldin. And it cost them in other ways.
    Grubbs in NO and Johnson in SD may be making more money than with the Ravens but they wont be in playoffs this year like they were here.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    387

    Default You Can't Even Call it a Sport

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    Nobody's even talking about the gutless way Harbaugh chose to end the 1st half against the Steelers. 32 seconds and 3 time outs left, and this chicken chit runs with his tail between his legs into the locker room after simply running out the clock. It's JUST LIKE BILLICK did in the game against the Colts. Exactly. They're both "play not to lose" coaches, and the results speak for themselves -- SEEMINGLY impressive w/l records (although Billick's is nowhere near as "impressive" as Harbaugh's), but gutless when it comes to the post season and/or playing against top level competition. Just like all their mentors -- Andy Reid, Marty, and Bo Schembechler.

    (Hey...I hear a satire song coming out of all of this: "Andy Reid, Marty, and Bo".)

    Because it's not. A business? Maybe. A sport? No.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    West Chester Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,252

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omaha Beach View Post
    As far as 5 years and out tell that to the Patriots and Belechick!
    ? That is the exception, not the rule. Not sure what your point is there. Of 32 teams, 5 have average coaching tenure > 6 years. Our franchise (including the Cleveland days) has an average tenure of 4.80 years.
    John has moved well past the average NFL coach tenure and is in all liklihood much closer to the end than the beginning.
    It's been a great run with a few chapters left to be written. These are the facts:

    http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sport...ure/53376918/1

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    4,967

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by West Chester Raven View Post
    ? That is the exception, not the rule. Not sure what your point is there. Of 32 teams, 5 have average coaching tenure > 6 years. Our franchise (including the Cleveland days) has an average tenure of 4.80 years.
    John has moved well past the average NFL coach tenure and is in all liklihood much closer to the end than the beginning.
    It's been a great run with a few chapters left to be written. These are the facts:

    http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sport...ure/53376918/1
    It could be argued that he inherited a very talented team and just rode their coattails during these 5 "successful" years

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278