Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: McLouth

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,327

    Default McLouth

    I just heard Jim Duquette say that Nate wants a long contract and his asking price is above his performance level (though no specific $$$ amount was mentioned). I guess we know what the hold up is.

    from what he did last year, 3 yrs is a good term (he's a young 31 yrs old). He provides GG defense and is a good multi-dimentional hitter. if you extrapolate his recent production over a full season, he's a 25HR, 90RBI guy. that feels like $7-8M/yr. it's not too much to ask a rehab player to show some love with a "thanks for pulling me off the scrapheap discount"

    JD also apologized to his cousin for revealing that the O's are looking at Ryan Sweeney to platoon in LF next year. I assume he'll be sharing time with Trayvon Robinson.

    based on the numbers, the O's look like their willing to downgrade in LF.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,206

    Default

    If the alternative is Robinson/Sweeney, im in favor of Mclouth returning. But I have no idea if DD feels a platoon of those two would be much more productive. And Robinson does not hit LH well. A platoon of Reimold/Sweeney would probably be much more effective. Though Sweeney is really only around a .345 OBP vs righties with little power.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,122

    Default

    The cheap get cheaper, the O's will finish in last place. No magic ride this coming season. They aren't as stable as the Tampa Bay Rays so they can't expect the "cheap" route to work for them consistently. We know Angelos has money to spend but refuses to spend it. Don't expect Josh Hamilton, Billy Butler, Michael Morse or any other true impact bat on this team. Danny Knobler of CBSSportsline.com just tweeted that the O's are frustrated that they can't add an impact bat since they don't have "money to spend", bull****.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,450

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    I just heard Jim Duquette say that Nate wants a long contract and his asking price is above his performance level (though no specific $$$ amount was mentioned). I guess we know what the hold up is.

    from what he did last year, 3 yrs is a good term (he's a young 31 yrs old). He provides GG defense and is a good multi-dimentional hitter. if you extrapolate his recent production over a full season, he's a 25HR, 90RBI guy. that feels like $7-8M/yr. it's not too much to ask a rehab player to show some love with a "thanks for pulling me off the scrapheap discount"

    JD also apologized to his cousin for revealing that the O's are looking at Ryan Sweeney to platoon in LF next year. I assume he'll be sharing time with Trayvon Robinson.

    based on the numbers, the O's look like their willing to downgrade in LF.
    McLouth earned a contract for this year with his clutch performance both offensively and defensively in 2012. If the O's don't sign him because they're looking for a bargain who can hit, they should sign the Impaler as DH for about $4M and put Davis in the outfield or first base.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SugarRay52 View Post
    The cheap get cheaper, the O's will finish in last place. No magic ride this coming season. They aren't as stable as the Tampa Bay Rays so they can't expect the "cheap" route to work for them consistently. We know Angelos has money to spend but refuses to spend it. Don't expect Josh Hamilton, Billy Butler, Michael Morse or any other true impact bat on this team. Danny Knobler of CBSSportsline.com just tweeted that the O's are frustrated that they can't add an impact bat since they don't have "money to spend", bull****.
    Yeah its the same story every year. Go into winter meetings a with a plan, come out of it with nothing because other teams dont want to trade with us. But the latest updates from Showalter is Reynolds might be back. Go figure. Again its because no other team wants him. Not because he did anything good.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,606

    Default

    When will the Orioles realize a platoon of below-average players at a position does not equal one good player at that position?

    Last year, the Orioles looked a lot better once the platoons at 1st, 3rd and LF were replaced by:

    Machado - 3rd
    Reynolds - 1st
    McClouth - LF

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Shire, Eriador, Middle Earth
    Posts
    2,231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    When will the Orioles realize a platoon of below-average players at a position does not equal one good player at that position?

    Last year, the Orioles looked a lot better once the platoons at 1st, 3rd and LF were replaced by:

    Machado - 3rd
    Reynolds - 1st
    McClouth - LF
    While the example you use from last year may be true, I'm not sure that the general principle you state is true. I recall Earl Weaver getting considerable production out of the Lowenstein/Roenicke platoon back in the day. If you have the roster space, it makes sense - choosing specific talents and putting them in specific spots to succeed.

    I am in favor of bringing McLouth back, though.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Joppatowne
    Posts
    927

    Default

    1 year deal according to baltimore sun text message i just got.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,327

    Default

    1 yr/$2M

    that's weak. maybe they figure Reimold will prove (once and for all) that they can/can't count on him as the long term solution. otherwise, at least add an option year. even if his offense doesn't live up to last year, he's a very good 4th OFer off the bench, especially at that money.

    I'm happy they're bringing him back

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Austin, Tx
    Posts
    17,454

    Default

    I hope that this at least puts the Swisher reports to rest.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slidemaster View Post
    I hope that this at least puts the Swisher reports to rest.
    I put the Swisher rumors right up there with the Konerko rumors.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,527

    Default

    The Orioles are bringing left fielder Nate McLouth back to the team.

    According to multiple sources, the Orioles and the 31-year-old left fielder have agreed to a one-year deal. There is no option involved.

    The Orioles haven’t announced the deal, but it is reportedly worth $2 million with $500,000 in performance bonuses.

    http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/o...,4873782.story

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,206

    Default

    $2.5m salary for McLouth is a steal. He must really like Baltimore to only sign a one year deal. I would have thought another team would have given McLouth at least twice that much if not more.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    1 Winning Drive
    Posts
    5,032

    Default

    Good- I like McLouth and dreaded the idea of Swisher.

    So much for the O's offseason...McLouth is the big FA signing...time to get ready for the season. LOL

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,913

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post

    The Orioles haven’t announced the deal, but it is reportedly worth $2 million with $500,000 in performance bonuses.
    That seems quite fair

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Joppatowne
    Posts
    927

    Default

    I figure they atleast have a 2 year worked out. 1 is short.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,605

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jabba2 View Post
    $2.5m salary for McLouth is a steal. He must really like Baltimore to only sign a one year deal. I would have thought another team would have given McLouth at least twice that much if not more.
    This. I thought for sure that some other team would take a chance on him for more than that.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Where the Beach "Is a way of Life"
    Posts
    23,317

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    1 yr/$2M

    that's weak. maybe they figure Reimold will prove (once and for all) that they can/can't count on him as the long term solution. otherwise, at least add an option year. even if his offense doesn't live up to last year, he's a very good 4th OFer off the bench, especially at that money.

    I'm happy they're bringing him back
    Huge deal at an unbelievable price. Gold Glove outfield, you can't beat that.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,016

    Default

    [QUOTE=RIKMAN;8213887]Good- I like McLouth and dreaded the idea of Swisher.



    Ditto this.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,477

    Default

    Kinda of shocked he signed for 1 year at $2M....typical Orioles offer. They low ball everybody

    But have to say I'm glad he's back
    Last edited by durango46; 12-05-2012 at 07:22 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278