Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 75

Thread: Lets just go over the cliff. Our debt isn't getting any smaller

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    R'lyeh
    Posts
    34,635

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    But 2% is still only 2%.
    That's the growth rate column, not % as GDP.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Semi, did you read the article?

    The column is correct in that nothing that will be proposed by Democrats or Republicans will cause more deficit reduction than going over the cliff...
    But will the surplus savings be used to pay down the national debt? What did Clinton do with the surplus he realized? He certainly didn't use it to pay down the debt as it continued to climb throughout his 8 year term.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,408

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Calamari View Post
    That's the growth rate column, not % as GDP.
    Ok, a 10% reduction as % of GDP seems a little better, but not what I call drastic.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    Ok, a 10% reduction as % of GDP seems a little better, but not what I call drastic.
    Fair enough.

    And what has trickle-down economics done to the debt and deficit?

    And should we continue w that philosophy?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pickles View Post
    Fair enough.

    And what has trickle-down economics done to the debt and deficit?

    And should we continue w that philosophy?
    Obama and Bernanke are using trickle down economics with stimulus and QE's. If you don't think they are then explain why not?

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    Obama and Bernanke are using trickle down economics with stimulus and QE's. If you don't think they are then explain why not?
    You honestly don't understand the difference between stimulus and trickle down economics?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pickles View Post
    You honestly don't understand the difference between stimulus and trickle down economics?
    Then explain it to me.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    Then explain it to me.
    I'll do it as quickly and simply as I can.

    Stimulus is the Fed sending money to the states, which they then use to pay their teachers, and firefighters, and policeman, etc. Or you know, the middle class. They also use it for public works, which, again, employs the middle class.

    Trickle down is the Fed cutting taxes largely for the rich, which is offshored, and hidden.

    If trickle down economics worked, then why the wealth gap expanded precipitously in the last 30 years?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,616

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    A little short-term pain for long-term gain:
    Thanks just the same, but how about you guys go off the cliff without me.

    I'm paying my fair share of taxes now and don't need their hand in my pocket anymore than it already is.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,616

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dsummoner View Post
    'Our?'

    No, that would be 'your' debt for your programs and spending.
    Byngo!

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pickles View Post
    I'll do it as quickly and simply as I can.

    Stimulus is the Fed sending money to the states, which they then use to pay their teachers, and firefighters, and policeman, etc. Or you know, the middle class. They also use it for public works, which, again, employs the middle class.

    Trickle down is the Fed cutting taxes largely for the rich, which is offshored, and hidden.

    If trickle down economics worked, then why the wealth gap expanded precipitously in the last 30 years?
    Are you sure you're not forgetting something else?

    The government stepped in to try to prevent the situation from getting as bad as the Great Depression, which lasted for over a decade. By providing stimulus money to individuals, the government helped people to continue to live in their homes while looking for jobs. The stimulus money provided to businesses was intended to help them to invest money in capital assets such as building new homes and offices. This was expected to result in new construction, which in turn provides jobs and eventually alleviates the need for unemployment payments, government-managed health care, and other direct benefits.

    http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-stimulus-money.htm

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,321

    Default

    To be honest I think going over the cliff would be a bad thing. I think the Republicans should take Obama's offer. But then again, they aren't that bright.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    PRCa./TN.
    Posts
    54,190

    Default

    'Stimulus' is the Obamanian regime providing the kickbacks to the unionized government grub slugs for providing 'the juice' for their support for him.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    Are you sure you're not forgetting something else?

    The government stepped in to try to prevent the situation from getting as bad as the Great Depression, which lasted for over a decade. By providing stimulus money to individuals, the government helped people to continue to live in their homes while looking for jobs. The stimulus money provided to businesses was intended to help them to invest money in capital assets such as building new homes and offices. This was expected to result in new construction, which in turn provides jobs and eventually alleviates the need for unemployment payments, government-managed health care, and other direct benefits.

    http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-stimulus-money.htm
    What's your point? The money still ends up a lot more in Main St. hands through 'stimulus' than Wall St. hands, through trickle down.

    Stimulus is not perfect. I never claimed that. There is waste.

    However, if trickle down is the better way to go, why don't you explain that to me. I'm all ears.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dsummoner View Post
    'Stimulus' is the Obamanian regime providing the kickbacks to the unionized government grub slugs for providing 'the juice' for their support for him.
    And trickle down is the GOP regimes providing the kickbacks to the fascist corporations that buy their add time in election season.

    Funny how that works.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,412

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunRaven View Post
    Thanks just the same, but how about you guys go off the cliff without me.

    I'm paying my fair share of taxes now and don't need their hand in my pocket anymore than it already is.
    Tax increases are inevitable. We can either pay a little more now or pay a lot more later.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pickles View Post
    What's your point? The money still ends up a lot more in Main St. hands through 'stimulus' than Wall St. hands, through trickle down.

    Stimulus is not perfect. I never claimed that. There is waste.

    However, if trickle down is the better way to go, why don't you explain that to me. I'm all ears.
    What's my point? Really?! My point is it's trickle down economics just like QE. Programs approved by Obama. The same guy who says growing the economy from the middle class out is the best economic plan. These are the same plans that are ridiculed by liberals. So where are the plans for growing the middle class out?

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Tax increases are inevitable. We can either pay a little more now or pay a lot more later.
    Before anyone pays one dime of new taxes we should demand a bill be passed which requires all surplus monies be used to pay down the national debt.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    What's my point? Really?! My point is it's trickle down economics just like QE. Programs approved by Obama. The same guy who says growing the economy from the middle class out is the best economic plan. These are the same plans that are ridiculed by liberals. So where are the plans for growing the middle class out?
    I fail to see how QE is solely a benefit for the 1%, though they do benefit greatly from it.

    I don't see how massive tax cuts, aimed largely at the rich, and the deregulation of markets, doesn't solely benefit the 1%.

    The rich get richer, man, under almost any economic policy. That can't be denied.

    However, again, explain to me how trickle down economics has or can benefit the middle class. I bet you can't do, because history shows that not to be the case.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    PRCa./TN.
    Posts
    54,190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pickles View Post
    And trickle down is the GOP regimes providing the kickbacks to the fascist corporations that buy their add time in election season.

    Funny how that works.
    Fascist corporations such as your Obama's General Motors or your Obama's big investment banks?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278