Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Roger GREEDell wants to expand the playoffs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    4,967

    Default Roger GREEDell wants to expand the playoffs

    According to the Late for Work on the Ravens website Roger GREEDell wants to expand the playoffs to include either 14 or 16 teams. Unbelievable. Does this guy hold meetings just to come up with more ways he can further water down and ruin the NFL?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,776

    Default

    Great. Just like basketball and hockey in June, soon, we'll be able to watch football in April.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,442

    Default

    The NFL regular season and playoffs are perfect. Why mess with a proven success and cash cow?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,416

    Default

    Too many teams go to the playoff now...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    5,392

    Default

    More games, longer season and Thursday night games here to stay. Good thing they care about players safety.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn, NYC (my heart will always be in Arlington, Va)
    Posts
    15,457

    Default

    I'd prefer they eliminate the automatic home game for division winners and leave the rest alone. Too bad they can expand it this year though to make up for any team who might be screwed over Seattle having an extra win they didn't get.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Timonium, MD
    Posts
    8,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HAIL2BNG View Post
    I'd prefer they eliminate the automatic home game for division winners and leave the rest alone. Too bad they can expand it this year though to make up for any team who might be screwed over Seattle having an extra win they didn't get.
    That happens every year. There is always some call that affects the playoffs.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn, NYC (my heart will always be in Arlington, Va)
    Posts
    15,457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rael View Post
    That happens every year. There is always some call that affects the playoffs.
    Not remotely like this. Not even close really.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4,241

    Default

    Based on 2011 a 9-7 and 8-8 team would have made the playoffs as the extra teams. However, going back to 2010, a 10-6 team would have made the playoffs as the extra team. In 2008 the 11-5 Patriots didn't make it.

    I think adding one team per conference and doing away with the 2nd seed bye might work. It only adds one more game to the playoff. But more teams have a shot near the end.

    I vote yes to 14 teams in the playoffs. But I also vote to abolish Thursday Night Football except for Thanks Giving.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    4,967

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang View Post
    Based on 2011 a 9-7 and 8-8 team would have made the playoffs as the extra teams. However, going back to 2010, a 10-6 team would have made the playoffs as the extra team. In 2008 the 11-5 Patriots didn't make it.

    I think adding one team per conference and doing away with the 2nd seed bye might work. It only adds one more game to the playoff. But more teams have a shot near the end.

    I vote yes to 14 teams in the playoffs. But I also vote to abolish Thursday Night Football except for Thanks Giving.
    It should stay as 12. GREEDell needs to go

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    6,802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Costanza 831 View Post
    According to the Late for Work on the Ravens website Roger GREEDell wants to expand the playoffs to include either 14 or 16 teams. Unbelievable. Does this guy hold meetings just to come up with more ways he can further water down and ruin the NFL?
    It's the greedy owners (Biscotti) who locked out the players and who come up with ways to ruin the game if it meas lining their pockets.

    Don't forget who Roger works for.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brohan View Post
    It's the greedy owners (Biscotti) who locked out the players and who come up with ways to ruin the game if it meas lining their pockets.

    Don't forget who Roger works for.
    Man, you've got a serious hard on for the Ravens owner.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,912

    Default

    He brought up the expansion to change the subject from an embarrassing bounty case that blew up in his face.

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...off-expansion/

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    6,802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LarryN View Post
    Man, you've got a serious hard on for the Ravens owner.
    Oh, I guess you like lockouts.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    742

    Default

    Can we go a couple weeks or a month without Goodell proposing all these changes to football? 2 weeks ago it was no blocks below the waist, last week it was lets not have a kickoff and now this. Personally I think he brought this up because it was the same day Paul went against his decision to suspend the Saints players. He just wanted a distraction from another one of his failures.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brohan View Post
    Oh, I guess you like lockouts.
    I have a feeling it goes beyond the lockout, what with you falsely accusing him of not providing benefits for his employees and all. Seriously, why don't you just open up and tell us all about the day Steve Bisciotti pissed on your Cheerios. It might do you good to get it off your chest.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,041

    Default

    Let's just give everybody a trophy before the opening-day games and get it over with.

    Oh, and while we're at it, given all the new girly-girl rules, let's change the uniforms to dresses.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    6,802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tacker View Post
    Let's just give everybody a trophy before the opening-day games and get it over with.

    Oh, and while we're at it, given all the new girly-girl rules, let's change the uniforms to dresses.
    Rodger does what the owners tell him to do. Owners are freaking out over the laswuits, and future lawsuits from former players that are going to kill their golden goose.

    Biscotti will still have his sweatshop.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278