It's a disgusting, disgusting, tragic incident. Horrifying.
When we look at the stats on how many are killed by alcohol and drug impaired drivers every day, every year, it's hard to NOT make a case against alcohol and drug legalization.
Yet as a society we don't get too worked up about that.
Comical.
I said that I wasn't getting into a discussion on guns today but I spent 26 years in the military and we knew how to control access to weapons and account for weapons especially battlefield weapons.
I will admit that with the jobs I had in the military I didn't get issued a weapon that often but on the times I was the only time I had any control over that weapon was while I was on duty. When my duty was over it got checked in at the Armory and all ammunition was accounted for. (We are of course not talking about the battlefield or war zones)
We could do the same with civilian ownership, in that if you wish to have automatic/military style weapons that are definitely not needed for personal protection then keep them at a gun club where they are secure and controlled. That would take automatic weapons of the street and then people like this kid this morning would not have access to them in the first place,
Last edited by Byng; 12-14-2012 at 08:01 PM.
There are plenty of irresponsible automobile owners who cause fatal accidents every day. Should we punish the responsible ones and take cars away from everyone? This crime could have been prevented if someone had gotten help for this deranged person, or had him committed so that he couldn't harm anyone. I am still of the mind that you don't treat the symptom but rather try to treat the disease.
There was a similar occurrence in China today but the assailant was armed with a knife. The difference was that none of the children were killed but it would have been a different story had he had an automatic weapon.
The situation would have been less horrific today if the shooter had not had an automatic weapon, the deaths would probably have been in the low single digits rather than closing in on 30. N0 Civilian needs an automatic weapon in the home for self protection.
I agree with you on the need for an automatic weapon, but I still think you are aiming your anger at the tool instead of the disease. If that person's issues and/or illnesses are properly addressed, the weapons he used become neutralized. Let's see how the story plays out and how many warning signs this kid displayed that went unaddressed. A forensic Phsychologist on CNN said that certainly firearms played a role in the tragedy, but if anyone with a mental illness of the type he displayed wanted to kill a number of people, there were other means he could have used. Again, treat the illness and the tool is rendered harmless. That is the more important key than using the tragedy as a means to call for increased gun control.
I have no idea, you can probably put my knowledge of guns, on a pinhead. But I do pride myself with having common sense and my common sense tells me that from a gun-control viewpoint automatic weapons are best out of the hands of civilians and locked up in an armory/gun-club.
Go check them out of the armory and run around the range playing soldiers to your hearts content but just check them back into the armory when your done?
Gun-free zones provide false sense of security
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2012/12/14/connecticut-school-shooting-gun-control/1770345/
“If there's someone present with a gun when a mass shooting begins, the shooter is likely to be shot himself. And, in fact, many mass shootings — from the high school shooting by Luke Woodham in Pearl, Miss., to the New Life Church shooting in Colorado Springs, Colo., where an armed volunteer shot the attacker — have been terminated when someone retrieved a gun from a car or elsewhere and confronted the shooter.
Policies making areas "gun free" provide a sense of safety to those who engage in magical thinking, but in practice, of course, killers aren't stopped by gun-free zones. As always, it's the honest people — the very ones you want to be armed — who tend to obey the law.”
And once again, the theory I postulated years ago has manifested itself again, unfortunately: In over 50% of the mass shootings, the shooter will continue shooting until someone else shoots him, or he commits suicide by firearm himself.
Every one of us, myself included, who work in “gun free zones”, are but sitting targets for psycho’s who choose to ignore both laws and signs proclaiming work areas are “weapon free". My CCW permit is only used away from work, I have no other choice. I do not like it, but I have gotten used to working, exposed like fish in a barrel.
I fully expect to see larger “NO GUNS” signs to replace the small stickers, to make us all feel safer while we work in our fish barrel. I have gotten used to it, how about the rest of you who are forced to work under the false security of “no gun” signs plastered everywhere at your workplace??
|
| Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv | Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278 |