Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 63

Thread: espn/mlb execs orioles poor offseason

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    152

    Default espn/mlb execs orioles poor offseason


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,312

    Default

    So far it has been.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,205

    Default

    I never expected the O's to make a splash in FA, because they rarely do, and there are alot of suiters for every FA this year. Wouldnt mind seeing them make a trade for a young, glove first 1B. I think the O's plan on doing some heavy platooning this year and again showing a 7-8 man rotation.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Firt Irwin, CA, USA!!
    Posts
    4,695

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by jabba2 View Post
    I never expected the O's to make a splash in FA, because they rarely do, and there are alot of suiters for every FA this year. Wouldnt mind seeing them make a trade for a young, glove first 1B. I think the O's plan on doing some heavy platooning this year and again showing a 7-8 man rotation.
    I think the Orioles will not make any real significant moves this off season because Mr. Angelos is convinced, as some on here seem to be as well, that last season was more real than an aberration and he feels he doesn’t need to get any real players because they can do it with mostly what they had last season, minus an important player or two.

    Some people on here expect the bull pen to do the exact same thing they did last season, even those people who have criticize spending big on BP in the past due to the unreliability from year to year of BP’s. There are people on here that believe the O’s will strike gold again next season and put together another once in a lifetime record in 1 run games, or put together another great record in extra innings.There are people here who seem to expect players who came into last season as NOBODIES and somehow outperformed their career numbers to either duplicate those numbers or better them again this coming season. There are people on here that seem to forget that the O’s haven’t done a thing to improve their team while other teams in the league, especially in their own division, have improved tremendously. They simply chalk it up to the moves those other teams have made, like the Jays and Sox, are meaningless and were stupid moves that will not yield anything positive while the O’s catch lightning in a bottle for a second year in a row.

    I believe that Mr. Angelos reads this place and Orioles Hang Out and he too thinks as some of you do, so to him there is no problem, the team is perfectly set for next year and any major move is completely unnecessary!!
    Last edited by joe cool; 12-26-2012 at 06:26 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Joppatowne
    Posts
    926

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jabba2 View Post
    I never expected the O's to make a splash in FA, because they rarely do, and there are alot of suiters for every FA this year. Wouldnt mind seeing them make a trade for a young, glove first 1B. I think the O's plan on doing some heavy platooning this year and again showing a 7-8 man rotation.
    I think out rotation is kind of set if Wada can stay healthy.
    Hammel
    Chen
    Wada
    (hopefully Saunders)
    Tillman

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joe cool View Post
    I think the Orioles will not make any real significant moves this off season because Mr. Angelos is convinced, as some on here seem to be as well, that last season was more real than an aberration and he feels he doesn’t need to get any real players because they can do it with mostly what they had last season, minus an important player or two. Some people on here expect the bull pen to do the exact same thing they did last season, even those people who have criticize spending big on BP in the past due to the unreliability from year to year of BP’s. There are people on here that believe the O’s will strike gold again next season and put together another once in a lifetime record in 1 run games, or put together another great record in extra innings.There are people here who seem to expect players who came into last season as NOBODIES and somehow outperformed their career numbers to either duplicate those numbers or better them again this coming season. There are people on here that seem to forget that the O’s haven’t done a thing to improve their team while other teams in the league, especially in their own division, have improved tremendously. They simply chalk it up to the moves those other teams have made, like the Jays and Sox, are meaningless and were stupid moves that will not yield anything positive while the O’s catch lightning in a bottle for a second year in a row. I believe that Mr. Angelos reads this place and Orioles Hang Out and he too thinks as some of you do, so to him there is no problem, the team is perfectly set for next year and any major move is completely unnecessary!!
    Except for the Yankees. By most accounts they've had a horrible offseason so far, unless they swing a lopsided trade or two. But I wont rule that out yet. Bostons FA signings are meh at best. Look like a bunch of filler to me.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    4,586

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aclobat View Post
    I think out rotation is kind of set if Wada can stay healthy.
    Hammel
    Chen
    Wada
    (hopefully Saunders)
    Tillman
    Not a single one of those pitchers has thrown more than one successful big league season, and Chen is the only one that's done that. Hammel missed time.

    You can't seriously think every single one is going to have a sub 4.00 ERA and start 30 games.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    4,586

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jabba2 View Post
    Except for the Yankees. By most accounts they've had a horrible offseason so far, unless they swing a lopsided trade or two. But I wont rule that out yet. Bostons FA signings are meh at best. Look like a bunch of filler to me.
    Yanks have stated they are in a weird-rebuilding/salary dumping stage. They are trying to cut money off the books.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,961

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joe cool View Post
    I think the Orioles will not make any real significant moves this off season because Mr. Angelos is convinced, as some on here seem to be as well, that last season was more real than an aberration and he feels he doesn’t need to get any real players because they can do it with mostly what they had last season, minus an important player or two. Some people on here expect the bull pen to do the exact same thing they did last season, even those people who have criticize spending big on BP in the past due to the unreliability from year to year of BP’s. There are people on here that believe the O’s will strike gold again next season and put together another once in a lifetime record in 1 run games, or put together another great record in extra innings.There are people here who seem to expect players who came into last season as NOBODIES and somehow outperformed their career numbers to either duplicate those numbers or better them again this coming season. There are people on here that seem to forget that the O’s haven’t done a thing to improve their team while other teams in the league, especially in their own division, have improved tremendously. They simply chalk it up to the moves those other teams have made, like the Jays and Sox, are meaningless and were stupid moves that will not yield anything positive while the O’s catch lightning in a bottle for a second year in a row. I believe that Mr. Angelos reads this place and Orioles Hang Out and he too thinks as some of you do, so to him there is no problem, the team is perfectly set for next year and any major move is completely unnecessary!!
    You ever hear of a paragraph son? Man that was hard to read. You may be right but so what? As a Yankee fan you need to worry about your own team and how they under achieved in the playoffs.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Softbank Orioles View Post
    Yanks have stated they are in a weird-rebuilding/salary dumping stage. They are trying to cut money off the books.
    They definitely have aging players. I guess they think they can plug anyone in RF and get 25 HR's with that porch, but they also dont appear to have a competent catcher right now.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joe cool View Post
    I think the Orioles will not make any real significant moves this off season because Mr. Angelos is convinced, as some on here seem to be as well, that last season was more real than an aberration and he feels he doesn’t need to get any real players because they can do it with mostly what they had last season, minus an important player or two. Some people on here expect the bull pen to do the exact same thing they did last season, even those people who have criticize spending big on BP in the past due to the unreliability from year to year of BP’s. There are people on here that believe the O’s will strike gold again next season and put together another once in a lifetime record in 1 run games, or put together another great record in extra innings.There are people here who seem to expect players who came into last season as NOBODIES and somehow outperformed their career numbers to either duplicate those numbers or better them again this coming season. There are people on here that seem to forget that the O’s haven’t done a thing to improve their team while other teams in the league, especially in their own division, have improved tremendously. They simply chalk it up to the moves those other teams have made, like the Jays and Sox, are meaningless and were stupid moves that will not yield anything positive while the O’s catch lightning in a bottle for a second year in a row. I believe that Mr. Angelos reads this place and Orioles Hang Out and he too thinks as some of you do, so to him there is no problem, the team is perfectly set for next year and any major move is completely unnecessary!!
    NOBODY said the moves that the Jays and Sox made are meaningless and stupid. But hey make things up Joe Fool

    MOST don't believe the Orioles are perfectly set

    We all understand PA is a terrible owner

    but hey thanks again for reminding us....over and over and over

    As usual you continue to troll about looking like a complete IDIOT


    knock yourself out dbag

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Where the Beach "Is a way of Life"
    Posts
    23,317

    Default

    This from Roch's blog this afternoon:

    "
    I've been asked about the rumor that the Orioles might send J.J. Hardy to the Tigers for Porcello and infielder Jhonny Peralta. I'm not privy to every conversation held by executive vice president Dan Duquette, but my guess is he has no intention of dealing his Gold Glove shortstop.
    This article on MLive.com pondered whether such a deal could be consummated. The exact wording was, "Could the Tigers package Porcello and Peralta for Hardy, as The Detroit News' Lynn Henning suggested on Twitter today?"
    Just posing a question. Not saying it was likely to happen.
    I checked Henning's tweet, which read, "Mulling possibilities for Tigers: Porcello/Peralta to O's: Peralta goes to 3B, Machado moves to SS. Orioles kill 2 birds. Tigers get a SS"
    Henning, one of the most respected reporters in the business and a really good guy, also tweeted, "Makes sense from Det. perspective. But Orioles really love Hardy."

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Byng View Post
    This from Roch's blog this afternoon:

    "
    I've been asked about the rumor that the Orioles might send J.J. Hardy to the Tigers for Porcello and infielder Jhonny Peralta. I'm not privy to every conversation held by executive vice president Dan Duquette, but my guess is he has no intention of dealing his Gold Glove shortstop.
    This article on MLive.com pondered whether such a deal could be consummated. The exact wording was, "Could the Tigers package Porcello and Peralta for Hardy, as The Detroit News' Lynn Henning suggested on Twitter today?"
    Just posing a question. Not saying it was likely to happen.
    I checked Henning's tweet, which read, "Mulling possibilities for Tigers: Porcello/Peralta to O's: Peralta goes to 3B, Machado moves to SS. Orioles kill 2 birds. Tigers get a SS"
    Henning, one of the most respected reporters in the business and a really good guy, also tweeted, "Makes sense from Det. perspective. But Orioles really love Hardy."
    Peralta is considered a below average defensive SS, and Porcell is a back of the rotation pitcher. it sounds like a Tigers fan came up with that trade scenario

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    15,224

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    Peralta is considered a below average defensive SS, and Porcell is a back of the rotation pitcher. it sounds like a Tigers fan came up with that trade scenario
    No, it was probably a Boston fan - that works for ESPN.
    I love how they use Saber and say "Boston is 10 wins better" with their signings - but look at who they signed.
    Their team looks like a Frankenstein's monster.

    Otoh, the Indians have done a great job revamping their offensive roster - but how is their pitching?
    They are two starters deep, and a bunch of ?'s after that.
    As weak as the Central is, they may still improve significantly.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Far from home View Post
    No, it was probably a Boston fan - that works for ESPN.
    I love how they use Saber and say "Boston is 10 wins better" with their signings - but look at who they signed.
    Their team looks like a Frankenstein's monster.

    Otoh, the Indians have done a great job revamping their offensive roster - but how is their pitching?
    They are two starters deep, and a bunch of ?'s after that.
    As weak as the Central is, they may still improve significantly.
    aside from Dempster, I don't see any impact additions to Boston. they collected complimentary players, although I've always been a fan of Stephen Drew.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,431

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    aside from Dempster, I don't see any impact additions to Boston. they collected complimentary players, although I've always been a fan of Stephen Drew.
    "Complementary" players sometime do fine as demonstrated by the O's last season. The word is the Red Sox are moving away from high priced, big ego free agents (Gonzalez, Crawford, Beckett) and going for players that are good in the clubhouse (whatever that means).

    In any case, 2013 is already preordained with my prediction that the Red Sox get back into the playoffs.

    Happy holidays to you and your family.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,370

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joe cool View Post
    I think the Orioles will not make any real significant moves this off season because Mr. Angelos is convinced, as some on here seem to be as well, that last season was more real than an aberration and he feels he doesn’t need to get any real players because they can do it with mostly what they had last season, minus an important player or two. Some people on here expect the bull pen to do the exact same thing they did last season, even those people who have criticize spending big on BP in the past due to the unreliability from year to year of BP’s. There are people on here that believe the O’s will strike gold again next season and put together another once in a lifetime record in 1 run games, or put together another great record in extra innings.There are people here who seem to expect players who came into last season as NOBODIES and somehow outperformed their career numbers to either duplicate those numbers or better them again this coming season. There are people on here that seem to forget that the O’s haven’t done a thing to improve their team while other teams in the league, especially in their own division, have improved tremendously. They simply chalk it up to the moves those other teams have made, like the Jays and Sox, are meaningless and were stupid moves that will not yield anything positive while the O’s catch lightning in a bottle for a second year in a row. I believe that Mr. Angelos reads this place and Orioles Hang Out and he too thinks as some of you do, so to him there is no problem, the team is perfectly set for next year and any major move is completely unnecessary!!
    Man you never give up do you? When will you realize that we really don't care what you think?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hector View Post
    "Complementary" players sometime do fine as demonstrated by the O's last season. The word is the Red Sox are moving away from high priced, big ego free agents (Gonzalez, Crawford, Beckett) and going for players that are good in the clubhouse (whatever that means).

    In any case, 2013 is already preordained with my prediction that the Red Sox get back into the playoffs.

    Happy holidays to you and your family.
    so you don't approve of giving bloated contracts to top shelf impact free agents, but you approve of giving bloated contracts to complimentary players.

    interesting strategy, let's see if it pays off for you and them this year.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,431

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    so you don't approve of giving bloated contracts to top shelf impact free agents, but you approve of giving bloated contracts to complimentary players.

    interesting strategy, let's see if it pays off for you and them this year.
    Which of the "complementary" free agents signed by the Red Sox this off-season received the same bloated contract that was given to Gonzalez, Crawford or Beckett?

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hector View Post
    Which of the "complementary" free agents signed by the Red Sox this off-season received the same bloated contract that was given to Gonzalez, Crawford or Beckett?
    I'm not sure where that question came from or why you're asking me. you should direct that question to the person who made that comment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278