The threat by Iran to close the straits would be in response to an attack by Israel and/or the U.S.
The irresponsible Netanyahu is the one pushing for a war that will involve America.
http://news.antiwar.com/2013/01/04/i...ship-position/
.
The threat by Iran to close the straits would be in response to an attack by Israel and/or the U.S.
The irresponsible Netanyahu is the one pushing for a war that will involve America.
http://news.antiwar.com/2013/01/04/i...ship-position/
.
Log Cabin Republicans say they oppose Hagel because he's anti-gay. The American Family Association says they oppose Hagel because he's pro-gay.
As one commenter noted:
I can think if no stronger endorsement than to have both the LCR & the AFA against you.
Hagel, an evolved Republican and twice wounded in combat veteran who actually volunteered to serve his country in both war and in Congress, is the right person at the right time to lead the Defense Department through the fiscal crisis and reasonably, responsibly out of Afghanistan.
Dieser Weg wird kein leichter sein; dieser Weg wird steinig und schwer.
Nicht mit vielen wirst du dir einig sein, doch dieses Leben bietet so viel mehr. --Xavier Naidoo
As Chuck Hagel rightly says, I am an American Senator not an Israeli Senator and as he told George Bush and Dick Cheney when it comes to unnecessary war and sending young Americans to foreign lands to fight and die I make my decision not as a Republican or a Democrat, I make those decisions as an American.
What is there not to like and support?
What is there not to like and support?
That's easy, he's Obama's choice. It matters not if it is a good choice for America, it matters only that he was selected by Obama.
It is a sad state of affairs in Washington if that is the only reason to oppose the nomination. Even sadder is that it would be the exact same thing if the roles were reversed.![]()
Hussein no longer cares about pandering to gays, Jews, or anyone. He got re-elected. Now he'll just do what he wants and flip off anyone who disagrees with him.
Why are you against American troops in Africa? There are less than 5000 American troops in Africa which consists of 54 different countries. All troops currently stationed in Africa are there at the request of the host Nation, approved by the host Nation and are addressing shared security interests.
Obstructionist repubs at it again. Their hole is getting deeper by the day. Lindsey Graham saying Chuck Hagel is out of the main stream.Lindsey must be an alien who visits earth ever so often.
Africa is the fastest growing continent in the world plus it is the continent with the most undeveloped natural resources. With the United States being the Worlds lone military superpower it is in our interest and the interest of Africa that all 54 countries in Africa develop in as orderly and peaceful manner as possible.
It is very positive, for trade (both ways) and for stability in the region that the United States is "the security partner of choice" for Africa especially when it advances the security interest of the United States while at the same time, together addressing what are clearly shared security interests both in stability and development.
Much better, in my view that the United States be the security partner of choice than China and/or Russia (who would like to be) for what I think are pretty obvious reasons.![]()
|
| Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv | Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278 |