I post an actual Supreme Court decision and you counter with a link from Snopes.Com and you have the audacity to ask me "How can you post your nonsense here without any kind of embarrassment? Have you actually read the Snopes response. It is poorly written and meanders all over without actually addressing the distinction between being a "natural born citizen" and a citizen via other means.
Attached are several additional citations from SCOTUS addressing the definition of "natural born. Undoubtedly, the Justices speak with more knowledge and legal authority than the opinion of SNOPES.com
The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)
Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
As to the significance of where or whether the President attended Christmas church services, I never stated there was any significance but merely raised the question where did they attend?
Happy New Year!
You post a link to a Supreme Court decision that doesn't say what you purport it to say and you accuse me of not being serious.
Happy New Year to you, too.
Dieser Weg wird kein leichter sein; dieser Weg wird steinig und schwer.
Nicht mit vielen wirst du dir einig sein, doch dieses Leben bietet so viel mehr. --Xavier Naidoo
|Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278