Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: UFO Lying On The Bottom Of The Baltic Sea?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,600

    Default UFO Lying On The Bottom Of The Baltic Sea?

    A Swedish expedition team has found an unidentified object at the bottom of the Baltic Sea, leaving some to believe it’s the remnants of an extra-terrestrial ship.

    Scientists went off on a deep-water dive to debunk some theories about the underwater object, but were left with more questions than they had answers.

    http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1...he-baltic-sea/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    A Swedish expedition team has found an unidentified object at the bottom of the Baltic Sea, leaving some to believe it’s the remnants of an extra-terrestrial ship.

    Scientists went off on a deep-water dive to debunk some theories about the underwater object, but were left with more questions than they had answers.

    http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1...he-baltic-sea/
    Usually a cigar is just a cigar. Or a rock in this case.

    To some observers, it is a UFO - The 'Roswell of the Ocean', while others speculate that it is a Nazi anti-submarine defence, or a plug to the underworld.

    But according to one expert, the 'strange' and 'mysterious' object, as described by the team who found it, is nothing more than glacial rocks that have been dragged across the ocean floor.

    Volker Brüchert, an associate professor of geology at Stockholm University, was handed stone samples of the object for analysis.

    He said he believed he was seeing nothing more than normal rocks, and told Live Science: 'It's good to hear critical voices about this 'Baltic Sea mystery.

    'What has been generously ignored by the Ocean-X team is that most of the samples they have brought up from the sea bottom are granites and gneisses and sandstones.'

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...#ixzz2GTTiMGup
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    16,274

    Default

    Looks like a rock formation to me.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,600

    Default

    At 285 feet you'd think they'd be able to send divers down there instead of just relying on unmanned vehicles.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Garyland
    Posts
    17,368

    Default

    An experience diver on a nitrox mix can dive 300 ft but it is a serious dive.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,600

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demopublican View Post
    An experience diver on a nitrox mix can dive 300 ft but it is a serious dive.
    How long could a diver stay down?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Garyland
    Posts
    17,368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    How long could a diver stay down?
    I Am not clear. The standard dive table only goes to 130 ft. Special deep dives like that would require a nitrogen/oxygen mix and possibly a decompression chamber on site.
    I worked with an army dive team once (yes the army used to have dive teams) that had an old landing craft converted into a dive boat. They had a decompression chamber on board and would stay down for hours on surface supplied air and simply use the chamber after every dive. It was intense. We were working at 70-100 ft in the chesapeake bay shipping channel. My crew was working on standard two tank systems with helmets and dive communication radios.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Yogurtshire
    Posts
    2,755

    Default

    I watched "Starman" today, Leftist ahole Jeff Bridges best acting job in it. Id say he studied mime, I dunno.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    None of your business
    Posts
    6,324

    Default

    I came across an article about this awhile back. Never finished it because it seemed like it was a load to begin with and written by someone desperately in search of their fifteen minutes of fame financed by other people's money. Not that I care one way or the other but it doesn't seem like it would be all that difficult to go down there and find out what it is. It will probably turn out being something like a fossilized prehistoric whale turd.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,815

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demopublican View Post
    I Am not clear. The standard dive table only goes to 130 ft. Special deep dives like that would require a nitrogen/oxygen mix and possibly a decompression chamber on site.
    I worked with an army dive team once (yes the army used to have dive teams) that had an old landing craft converted into a dive boat. They had a decompression chamber on board and would stay down for hours on surface supplied air and simply use the chamber after every dive. It was intense. We were working at 70-100 ft in the chesapeake bay shipping channel. My crew was working on standard two tank systems with helmets and dive communication radios.
    Interesting. What kind of visibility did you have in the shipping channel?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1

    Default we are only gonna cover it up

    sorry

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278