Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: $100 Million Lawsuit Sought Against Connecticut for Failing to Provide Security

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,335

    Default 1

    Quote Originally Posted by Wizard777 View Post
    They can sue the State for negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
    Except for the fact that act only applies to actions against the federal government and its agencies.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omaha Beach View Post
    They all became criminals the second they started shooting people.
    Well sure. Before that they are potential criminals. Should we strive to keep guns out of the hands of potential criminals? (That's the thing with making that kind of sophistic argument, you can be hoisted on yr own petard).

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    A world of His own creation
    Posts
    59,289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bmoreteacher View Post
    In CT, everything is run by town governments, not counties, so I'd wonder if people can sue towns (I'm from there, but I'm not sure...) I don't see how the court could find that Newtown failed to provide security. The doors had locks, the secretary did not buzz the shooter in, the classroom doors could be locked and opened in (allowing teachers to barricade the doors if they had time) and the shooting happened before police could possibly have gotten on the scene in a town the size of Newtown. What happened was an unforeseeable tragedy, but I don't see how the town or state could possibly be held liable.
    Basically local governments be it county or town do not have Sovereign Immunity. Only the state and federal governments.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    A world of His own creation
    Posts
    59,289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omaha Beach View Post
    Except for the fact that act only applies to actions against the federal government and its agencies.
    Good catch! One word too many. It's the Tort Claims Act.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Harford County
    Posts
    11,364

    Default

    "I don't think stopping gun violence is about more gun control... This shooting (NewHaven) is about people who aren't taught the value of life" Samuel Jackson during interview about Django.

    Sorry for no link. I could not find a digital copy of the interview.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,335

    Default 100

    Quote Originally Posted by ms maggie View Post
    Well sure. Before that they are potential criminals. Should we strive to keep guns out of the hands of potential criminals? (That's the thing with making that kind of sophistic argument, you can be hoisted on yr own petard).
    You have no solution except to ban guns which is too late to solve the problem with the number of guns, already in circulation. Other than that you want to keep law abiding people from being able to defend themselves from nuts like Lanza, and Loughner.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278