Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 65

Thread: Get off your high horse

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,036

    Default Get off your high horse

    there has been a growing discussion about the class of players appearing on the HOF, now that sterroid era players are eligible.

    I just heard Richard Justice share his opinion on the subject. he said writers can't know all the players who used PEDS, as such, it's not fair to not vote for a confirmed user. in other words, known users shouldn't be punished until all users are punished.

    that's an interesting philosophy. perhaps we should use that in all corners of society. no speeding tickets for anyone, because the cops can't catch every speeder, and so on.

    then he said the voters need to get off their high horse and let Bagwell in. he must have a real thing for Bagwell.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,036

    Default

    a post career Bagwell. wow, he's really slimmed down. he must be dieting

    http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/a0wtB...8/Jeff+Bagwell

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,099

    Default

    I think I might be the only baseball fan in America who doesn't give two shiites about the steroid era

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    I think I might be the only baseball fan in America who doesn't give two shiites about the steroid era
    I think players at the level of Bonds and Clemens should make the HOF.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanbalt View Post
    I think players at the level of Bonds and Clemens should make the HOF.
    I agree 100%. I think if you have the numbers regardless of steroids you should get in. Palmeiro and McGuire should already be in

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    15,221

    Default

    Bagwell, imo, isn't a HOFer.
    You still have other guys, like Dale Murphy, who was unquestionably one of the best players of his era, sitting out there.
    Jack Morris, imo, is more deserving than Clemens.
    Bonds, on the other hand, still deserves to go in the Hall. He was best player just about anyone alive has seen play.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Far from home View Post
    Jack Morris, imo, is more deserving than Clemens.
    Not according to the numbers. Say what you want about Clemens but I'm pretty sure he makes the list of top 10 pitchers of all time for most people

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    15,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    Not according to the numbers. Say what you want about Clemens but I'm pretty sure he makes the list of top 10 pitchers of all time for most people
    Yeah, you're right.
    I just can't stand him - which is creating bias on my part.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,036

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    I think I might be the only baseball fan in America who doesn't give two shiites about the steroid era
    it's that attitude that lets the bad guys win

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,036

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Far from home View Post
    Bagwell, imo, isn't a HOFer.
    I agree.

    I liked Bagwell as a player. he made it fun to watch Astros games. but his body tell me, beyond any reasonable doubt, that he was juicing. as a juicer, he was nowhere near the production level of the other juicers. he needs about 100-125 more HRs.

    Bonds, on the other hand, still deserves to go in the Hall. He was best player just about anyone alive has seen play.
    I'd put Griffey jr. above him. Griffey was a significantly better defensive player, and with no hint of PEDs suspicion, he was obviously a bigger offensive presence as well. take away Balco, and I have no doubt Griffey would have surpassed Bonds in power numbers.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,389

    Default

    [QUOTE=weird-O;8238392]I agree.

    I liked Bagwell as a player. he made it fun to watch Astros games. but his body tell me, beyond any reasonable doubt, that he was juicing. ...QUOTE]


    "It wasn't juice. It was protein shakes"

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,389

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    I agree.

    I liked Bagwell as a player. he made it fun to watch Astros games. but his body tell me, beyond any reasonable doubt, that he was juicing. as a juicer, he was nowhere near the production level of the other juicers. he needs about 100-125 more HRs.



    I'd put Griffey jr. above him. Griffey was a significantly better defensive player, and with no hint of PEDs suspicion, he was obviously a bigger offensive presence as well. take away Balco, and I have no doubt Griffey would have surpassed Bonds in power numbers.
    On a more serious note, completely agree.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,036

    Default

    [QUOTE=Gizmo;8238436]
    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    I agree.

    I liked Bagwell as a player. he made it fun to watch Astros games. but his body tell me, beyond any reasonable doubt, that he was juicing. ...QUOTE]


    "It wasn't juice. It was protein shakes"
    LOL!!! he was great in that movie

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    398

    Default

    Bonds and company made 100’s of million whether or not some nerd like Ken Rosenthal votes for them is trivial. Plus Ken and company jumped on for the ride and didn’t question what was happening at the time. Right now in New York they have an ageless SS but no one except Skip Bayless has had the guts to ask the tough questions. The voters are/were part of problem.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ravenation
    Posts
    19,860

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weird-O View Post
    a post career Bagwell. wow, he's really slimmed down. he must be dieting

    http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/a0wtB...8/Jeff+Bagwell
    That just like Jay Gibbons.
    He went from looking like Popeye to looking like Olive Oyl

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,036

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mythoughts View Post
    That just like Jay Gibbons.
    He went from looking like Popeye to looking like Olive Oyl
    he was an Orioles, so he's innocent

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    595

    Default

    I wouldn't vote for any of those I suspect used steroids including Griffey, Biggio, Bagwell, Piazza even though they never got caught.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,161

    Default http://ryancoleman.org/


  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,495

    Default

    They need to either simply vote in the best players of the steroid era regardless of how they tested or not vote anyone in. This business where the voters attempt to determine who was and was not clean is ridiculous.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    I'm here from downtown, I'm here from Mitch and Murray. - David Mamet
    Posts
    11,036

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Jazz View Post
    They need to either simply vote in the best players of the steroid era regardless of how they tested or not vote anyone in. This business where the voters attempt to determine who was and was not clean is ridiculous.
    so punish everyone?

    and what years of service do you begin and end this blanket guilty verdict on the entire player's union?

    are you thinking of something along the lines of - every player whose career included the years between 1989 - 2012 are automatically disqualified from HOF eligibility.

    for example, Trout, Harper and Machado, if they accomplish HOF caliber careers, are disqualified because they played in the same year as Melky. is this what you have in mind?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278