Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 54

Thread: After 5 Years, Billick Gets First Interview

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4,446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eastside Terp View Post
    I know how you feel about it bud but I don't agree ......

    its ridiculous that lovie smith is getting interviews .....
    Lovie Smith is the right color. Remember the Rooney Rule.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,989

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang View Post
    Lovie Smith is the right color. Remember the Rooney Rule.
    Lovie Smith, similarly to Brian Billick (although I don't know why Billick would want to coach at this stage in his life/career), deserves a chance to coach again IMO. He's not perfect, but is a lot better than many out there. Jay Cutler was his demise. Cutler, like Boller for Billick - coach killer! I don't think for a minute though that these interviews this year are serious at all and I agree they are no more than Rooney rules...

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4,446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NCBirdfan View Post
    Lovie Smith, similarly to Brian Billick (although I don't know why Billick would want to coach at this stage in his life/career), deserves a chance to coach again IMO. He's not perfect, but is a lot better than many out there. Jay Cutler was his demise. Cutler, like Boller for Billick - coach killer! I don't think for a minute though that these interviews this year are serious at all and I agree they are no more than Rooney rules...
    I agree Lovie Smith deserves another chance. He got his team to the Superbowl with a subpar QB and was 10-6 when he was fired. The NFL is full of teams that seem to hire losing coaches through the "good 'ol boys" network. Maybe the Rooney Rule was needed. I have no idea. But teams are going to hire who they want regardless of the rule which means a lot of coaches will have their time wasted.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Manny View Post
    He tried to outsmart the stats on the other team. For instance, if they were weak against the run, he ran mostly passing plays.
    That too. He was always "smarter" than everyone else. (In his own mind, anyway.) It rarely paid off.


  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Pasadena, MD
    Posts
    20,982

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    That too. He was always "smarter" than everyone else. (In his own mind, anyway.) It rarely paid off.

    Like in the 2006 playoffs when the genius rarely called running plays despite the Colts having the 6th worst running defense in NFL history.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bud View Post
    Like in the 2006 playoffs when the genius rarely called running plays despite the Colts having the 6th worst running defense in NFL history.
    Especially after Jamal was really starting to run over the left side because back then Freeney was more of a 1 trick pony. They had that play working in the first half, then totally abandoned it in the second half. So yes...exactly like that.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    6,898

    Default

    How convenient Glen and Burnie Barstool forget the Cotls holding the Ravens to 3 points in the '09 playoffs.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    Good luck Brian!

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Caroline County
    Posts
    3,210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brohan View Post
    How convenient Glen and Burnie Barstool forget the Cotls holding the Ravens to 3 points in the '09 playoffs.
    Different year. Different circumstances. Billick screwed up in big-time 2006, starting with no practice whatsoever during the bye week.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    6,898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Manny View Post
    Different year. Different circumstances. Billick screwed up in big-time 2006, starting with no practice whatsoever during the bye week.
    The Colts were a better team. Take a peek at their record vs. the Ravens over the last decade.

    How many turnovers did Heap and Clayton have that game...how about McNair?

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brohan View Post
    The Colts were a better team. Take a peek at their record vs. the Ravens over the last decade.

    How many turnovers did Heap and Clayton have that game...how about McNair?
    Because Billick stupidly abandoned THE RUN. You've just MADE the point -- unintentionally, of course -- that others have already -- intentionally -- made. Thanks.


  12. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    6,898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    Because Billick stupidly abandoned THE RUN. You've just MADE the point -- unintentionally, of course -- that others have already -- intentionally -- made. Thanks.



    Just admit Billick's large vocabulary made you feel stupid...rightfully so.

    I love how you cup-sniffers blame everthing on the coaches when things goes wrong, and give the players all the credit when things go right.

    Typical Baltimoron.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Caroline County
    Posts
    3,210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brohan View Post
    The Colts were a better team. Take a peek at their record vs. the Ravens over the last decade.

    How many turnovers did Heap and Clayton have that game...how about McNair?
    I agree with Original Colts fan. His playcalling that game was nothing short of mind blowing.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,421

    Default

    And the Eagles chose NOT to hire Brian Billick:

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...th-chip-kelly/

    (I wonder what the "Brian will have a job the next day" apologists will come up with now, eh?)


  15. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,527

    Default

    Billick is old school. The trend the last few years is to hire new coaching talent or assistants who haven't had a shot.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Caroline County
    Posts
    3,210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    And the Eagles chose NOT to hire Brian Billick:

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...th-chip-kelly/
    It's telling the likes of Jacksonville don't even come calling. Meanwhile, every year teams publicly speculate about Cowher and Gruden. Immediately upon his firing, Reid had several teams want him. In the same way, Whisenhunt will be back by 2014 at the very latest. Billick clearly isn't coveted in markets outside the 410 area code. To state otherwise shows ignorance to Billick's true image.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Baltimore: Raven Nation Army Strong
    Posts
    12,370

    Default

    Younger and cheaper. (As Brian would say.)

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by baltimoreron View Post
    Younger and cheaper. (As Brian would say.)
    Well...Andy Reid was born in 1958; Billick was born in 1954. And I have no idea how much Reid got with the Chiefs.

    (And I'm not assuming you agree with Billick's claim of "younger and cheaper", just stating what Billick has said. However...the fact that basically NO team has gone after him says something a lot more substantial than Billick's convenient mantra.)

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Manny View Post
    It's telling the likes of Jacksonville don't even come calling. Meanwhile, every year teams publicly speculate about Cowher and Gruden. Immediately upon his firing, Reid had several teams want him. In the same way, Whisenhunt will be back by 2014 at the very latest. Billick clearly isn't coveted in markets outside the 410 area code. To state otherwise shows ignorance to Billick's true image.
    Exactly. It's pretty obvious to anyone who's not a Brian Billick apologist.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Caroline County
    Posts
    3,210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by baltimoreron View Post
    Younger and cheaper. (As Brian would say.)
    If that's how he justifies it in his mind. Like I said, the other guys (Cowher, Gruden) consistently get contacted about interest. Billick does not. It's not as if teams are too afraid that Billick won't want their job or they cannot afford him.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278