Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: GOP outraged by Obama's executive orders on guns, but still not certain why

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,481

    Default GOP outraged by Obama's executive orders on guns, but still not certain why

    Funny piece:

    Republicans spent Tuesday announcing that whatever Obama was about to announce in order to help curb gun violence in America was "tyranny." So, did the announcement of Obama's actual executive orders quell the fears of the paranoid? Of course not, and so we spent the entirety of the day listening to generic statements about how Obama's list of seemingly not all-that-controversial small actions is, in fact, definitely still tyranny.

    Notably absent in any of the statements was a specific note of which specific Obama executive orders were the outrageous ones. Are we still going to impeach Obama? For which thing, for promising to nominate an ATF director? For informing the CDC that their scientists are, in fact, allowed to at least examine the issue of gun violence? The bit about more armed security officers in schools, which was the National Rifle Association's greatest plan ever but which presumably is what Hitler would have done, now that Obama actually agreed to it? Let's run down the list of oh-so-wounded responses.

    Which ones, among the executive orders, are the ones that "make laws in violation" of the Constitution as understood by Rand Paul? Hell if he knows—his one-page document doesn't mention a single one of them—but he's aginnit anyway. Sweet Jesus, these people have sailed so far past the shores of reality that they can't even remember what reality looks like.

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/0...ot-certain-why

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    634

    Default

    I don't think EO's were signed. Only Presidential Memorandum 3 I think.

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-...ecutive-branch

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,632

    Default

    It's a tactic used to get out in front of the gun debate. Obviously a smart move. The President was hit by a tidal wave and backed down from his tough gun stance. Now he is just asking nicely that congress do the right thing whatever that means. Most people don't know the difference between an automatic and semi-automatic weapon and anti-gun nutters who do know are happy to keep the masses confused.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278