Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 40 of 40

Thread: Jim Caldwell extended through 2013 as OC

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SugarRay52 View Post
    Joe and Caldwell work very well together and they want to keep that going. I'm still cool with you but we will have to agree to disagree on this one, I just can't agree with you on this right now.
    It's all good, man. Just try to discuss it without getting so personal, is all.

    Peace.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,608

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Costanza 831 View Post
    Me and OriginalColtsFan usually see pretty eye to eye but i gotta disagree on this one. Caldwell has done a good job with Cam's terrible playbook and the team has advanced to the Super Bowl. He at least deserves a shot at having a full year to implement his own schemes and whatnot
    Agreed. And give Caldwell and Harbaugh credit if they asked Joe at halftime what he thought and took it into consideration.

    That idiot Cam would've kept on with his approach regardless of what other input was available to him. A good leader looks for input from his troops.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunRaven View Post
    Agreed. And give Caldwell and Harbaugh credit if they asked Joe at halftime what he thought and took it into consideration.

    That idiot Cam would've kept on with his approach regardless of what other input was available to him. A good leader looks for input from his troops.
    Let's get one thing clear, okay? Caldwell didn't ASK Joe anything. Joe went to Caldwell and stated that the offense needed to be opened up, and Harbaugh supported that. It wasn't the other way around.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,107

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    Let's get one thing clear, okay? Caldwell didn't ASK Joe anything. Joe went to Caldwell and stated that the offense needed to be opened up, and Harbaugh supported that. It wasn't the other way around.
    Bottomline is the adjustment was made, would that have happened if Cam was here? Caldwell is still feeling his way as a playcaller but according to Aaron Wilson he and Joe get along great and he actually encourages Joe to offer his input. Caldwell is not the dictator that Cameron was.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SugarRay52 View Post
    Bottomline is the adjustment was made, would that have happened if Cam was here? Caldwell is still feeling his way as a playcaller but according to Aaron Wilson he and Joe get along great and he actually encourages Joe to offer his input. Caldwell is not the dictator that Cameron was.
    That's all well and good, but I was responding to the post that falsely stated that Caldwell went to Flacco, rather than the other way around. No need to try to redirect the focus elsewhere. I'm not talking about Caldwell's openness; that's a given, and a definite positive. But it's not the "bottom line" as far as the post to which I was responding, okay?

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,107

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    That's all well and good, but I was responding to the post that falsely stated that Caldwell went to Flacco, rather than the other way around. No need to try to redirect the focus elsewhere. I'm not talking about Caldwell's openness; that's a given, and a definite positive. But it's not the "bottom line" as far as the post to which I was responding, okay?
    Ok I get it and you're right Joe did go to Caldwell and the adjustment was made and that wouldn't have happened if Cam was here, that's my point. When Joe speaks up now I actually believe that adjustments will actually be made over the course of a game because the communication between the OC and QB is much better.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SugarRay52 View Post
    Ok I get it and you're right Joe did go to Caldwell and the adjustment was made and that wouldn't have happened if Cam was here, that's my point. When Joe speaks up now I actually believe that adjustments will actually be made over the course of a game because the communication between the OC and QB is much better.
    The funny thing is...while I was watching the game, I said to myself: "If Caldwell keeps calling those stupid running plays on first down, Joe ought to rebel and call his own plays". At the start of the second half, Joe was in the shotgun, and the rest, as they say, is history. What I didn't know at the time was that Joe had gone to Caldwell and told him they needed to open up the offense. (OR that Harbaugh heavily supported that change in direction, which is a very positive thing in and of itself.) Clearly, that shows a major difference between Caldwell and Cameron, which is what you're saying, and I agree. What I want to see is Caldwell opening things up earlier, and giving the offense more of a chance, rather than forfeiting away 1/2 of a game. (And when I say "opening things up", what I'm really saying is mixing in more first down passes, is all, NOT abandoning the run the way Cameron did.) The Ravens did the same thing in Denver, and were admittedly lucky to get a win with that final drive to tie things up with under a minute left to play in regulation. There's no need to keep painting oneself in the corner. If Caldwell learns that, and adjusts, things should go very well for the Ravens offense. So let's hope it goes that way, shall we?


  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,107

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    The funny thing is...while I was watching the game, I said to myself: "If Caldwell keeps calling those stupid running plays on first down, Joe ought to rebel and call his own plays". At the start of the second half, Joe was in the shotgun, and the rest, as they say, is history. What I didn't know at the time was that Joe had gone to Caldwell and told him they needed to open up the offense. (OR that Harbaugh heavily supported that change in direction, which is a very positive thing in and of itself.) Clearly, that shows a major difference between Caldwell and Cameron, which is what you're saying, and I agree. What I want to see is Caldwell opening things up earlier, and giving the offense more of a chance, rather than forfeiting away 1/2 of a game. (And when I say "opening things up", what I'm really saying is mixing in more first down passes, is all, NOT abandoning the run the way Cameron did.) The Ravens did the same thing in Denver, and were admittedly lucky to get a win with that final drive to tie things up with under a minute left to play in regulation. There's no need to keep painting oneself in the corner. If Caldwell learns that, and adjusts, things should go very well for the Ravens offense. So let's hope it goes that way, shall we?

    We shall see how things play out come Superbowl Sunday. On another note how cool is this:

    http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BBTiiftCQAAv31b.jpg

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SugarRay52 View Post
    We shall see how things play out come Superbowl Sunday. On another note how cool is this:

    http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BBTiiftCQAAv31b.jpg
    Cool indeed.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,377

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    Cool indeed.
    I've read several versions:

    • Harbaugh went into the Offense's meeting at half time and said it was the AFC Championship and [you] don't win by hoping...
    • Caldwell went to Joe...
    • Joe went to Caldwell...

    Regardless, the TEAM came out of the halftime break and put a serious beat-down on the Patsies in the 2nd half.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peej7245 View Post
    I've read several versions:

    • Harbaugh went into the Offense's meeting at half time and said it was the AFC Championship and [you] don't win by hoping...
    • Caldwell went to Joe...
    • Joe went to Caldwell...

    Regardless, the TEAM came out of the halftime break and put a serious beat-down on the Patsies in the 2nd half.
    Making half time adjustments is fine. And necessary. But coming out and playing 4 full quarters of "play to win" football is better. And I expect to see a championship team that understands and implements the difference between 4 full quarters of play to win football vs 1/2 of a game of play to win football. It's really that simple.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,377

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    Making half time adjustments is fine. And necessary. But coming out and playing 4 full quarters of "play to win" football is better. And I expect to see a championship team that understands and implements the difference between 4 full quarters of play to win football vs 1/2 of a game of play to win football. It's really that simple.
    Can't disagree with you on this point. However, I have seen three things happen in many football games:

    1. Seldom is the game won in the first half...regardless of the score (to whit, the Cardinals game last year.).

    2. Early on, both teams feel each other out to determine what will work.

    3. The team that makes the better adjustments will more likely win...and did so!

    At the half, it was only 13-7, and I theorize that the Ravens had developed the feeling that they could handle NE's offense. The solution was to put the team on Flacco's shoulders.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    The funny thing is...while I was watching the game, I said to myself: "If Caldwell keeps calling those stupid running plays on first down, Joe ought to rebel and call his own plays". At the start of the second half, Joe was in the shotgun, and the rest, as they say, is history. What I didn't know at the time was that Joe had gone to Caldwell and told him they needed to open up the offense. (OR that Harbaugh heavily supported that change in direction, which is a very positive thing in and of itself.) Clearly, that shows a major difference between Caldwell and Cameron, which is what you're saying, and I agree. What I want to see is Caldwell opening things up earlier, and giving the offense more of a chance, rather than forfeiting away 1/2 of a game. (And when I say "opening things up", what I'm really saying is mixing in more first down passes, is all, NOT abandoning the run the way Cameron did.) The Ravens did the same thing in Denver, and were admittedly lucky to get a win with that final drive to tie things up with under a minute left to play in regulation. There's no need to keep painting oneself in the corner. If Caldwell learns that, and adjusts, things should go very well for the Ravens offense. So let's hope it goes that way, shall we?

    Give Caldwell a chance. It's only his 5th game ever as OC on the NFL level. Who cares whether he made the call or Flacco made it? With Cameron it was his way or the highway. Atleast it seems as if Caldwell is open to someone else's opinion. I think the 2nd half against NE opened everyone's eyes. We now have another option on offense if plan A isn't working. Give Caldwell a chance before you start drawing absolutes about him. This is still a work in progress and already we can see the offense is better than it was.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 85Knight View Post
    Give Caldwell a chance. It's only his 5th game ever as OC on the NFL level. Who cares whether he made the call or Flacco made it? With Cameron it was his way or the highway. Atleast it seems as if Caldwell is open to someone else's opinion. I think the 2nd half against NE opened everyone's eyes. We now have another option on offense if plan A isn't working. Give Caldwell a chance before you start drawing absolutes about him. This is still a work in progress and already we can see the offense is better than it was.
    Don't put words in my mouth. HERE is EXACTLY what I said:

    If Caldwell learns that, and adjusts, things should go very well for the Ravens offense. So let's hope it goes that way, shall we?

    Note the word "IF", and the fact that I ended it on a positive note. It's the KEY to reading AND comprehension. The very fact that I used the word IF shows I'm more than willing to give him a chance. So next time, pay more careful attention to what I actually said, then we can avoid these sorts of unpleasantries in the future.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peej7245 View Post
    Can't disagree with you on this point. However, I have seen three things happen in many football games:

    1. Seldom is the game won in the first half...regardless of the score (to whit, the Cardinals game last year.).

    2. Early on, both teams feel each other out to determine what will work.

    3. The team that makes the better adjustments will more likely win...and did so!

    At the half, it was only 13-7, and I theorize that the Ravens had developed the feeling that they could handle NE's offense. The solution was to put the team on Flacco's shoulders.
    Again...teams that are capable of putting together 4 full quarters of football deserve to be crowned champions. The Ravens have amply demonstrated that they are more than capable of putting together a competent offense for 4 full quarters. Just go back to the opening game against the Bengals. (One, which, according to some reports, was Caldwell's design, rather than Cameron's design.) No need to keep making apologies for efforts that are less than that. THAT is the gold standard. The Ravens have proven that they're capable of that, and nothing LESS than that should be acceptable. How's that?

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    Don't put words in my mouth. HERE is EXACTLY what I said:

    If Caldwell learns that, and adjusts, things should go very well for the Ravens offense. So let's hope it goes that way, shall we?

    Note the word "IF", and the fact that I ended it on a positive note. It's the KEY to reading AND comprehension. The very fact that I used the word IF shows I'm more than willing to give him a chance. So next time, pay more careful attention to what I actually said, then we can avoid these sorts of unpleasantries in the future.
    Put words in your mouth? You sure sounded very critical of Caldwell in only his 6th game as OC to me. Of course Caldwell is going to learn and adjust as time goes on but you were asking him to be perfect already. I don't know where all these unpleasantries came from from your side but I was only responding to what I read and I still think my comprehension was spot on. If you can't see your negativity then that's your problem. Us Ravens fans are more than happy with the direction the offense is heading.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 85Knight View Post
    Put words in your mouth? You sure sounded very critical of Caldwell in only his 6th game as OC to me. Of course Caldwell is going to learn and adjust as time goes on but you were asking him to be perfect already. I don't know where all these unpleasantries came from from your side but I was only responding to what I read and I still think my comprehension was spot on. If you can't see your negativity then that's your problem. Us Ravens fans are more than happy with the direction the offense is heading.
    Clearly, reading and comprehension is not your strong suit.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    Clearly, reading and comprehension is not your strong suit.
    You're stooping to lower and lower levels the more you speak. If you think I'm going there with you you're fooling yourself.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 85Knight View Post
    You're stooping to lower and lower levels the more you speak. If you think I'm going there with you you're fooling yourself.
    We're done.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    We're done.
    Of course we are because you've been exposed on so many levels it's not even funny. The sad part about it is you don't even realize it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278