Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Nebraska governor approves revised Keystone pipeline route

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,625

    Default Nebraska governor approves revised Keystone pipeline route

    Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman notified the Obama administration Tuesday that he has approved the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline to traverse his state, marking a significant step toward reviving the project after President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sidelined it.
    The Republican governor approved a revised route for the Canada-to-Texas pipeline which his office said would avoid environmentally sensitive areas.


    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...#ixzz2IkeXoNju

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    With my family!
    Posts
    76,229

    Default

    The environmentalists are up in arms about this one.
    My children are my legacy.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,625

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mom49of4 View Post
    The environmentalists are up in arms about this one.
    If they found a safer route Mom why should they be?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,476

    Default

    I don't believe private land should be taken from Americans and given to a foreign company. It sets a bad precedent. I don't think it has been done in the past.

    The Eminent Domain issues bother me more than the environmental issues...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,625

    Default

    Jobs, Jobs, Jobs!

    But supporters -- including some in the president's own party -- have downplayed the environment impact and stressed the economic benefits the pipeline could bring. The pipeline is backed by the unions, and has been heavily promoted by Canadian officials. In Heineman's letter, the governor said construction in Nebraska would yield $418 million in economic benefits.

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...#ixzz2IkhrKvSZ

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    the NC sandhills
    Posts
    26,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    I don't believe private land should be taken from Americans and given to a foreign company. It sets a bad precedent. I don't think it has been done in the past.

    The Eminent Domain issues bother me more than the environmental issues...
    Without eminent domain, you'd be walking to work or your drive would be twice as long.

    But more to the point, we're talking about Nebraska here. Nebraska.

    Aside from wheat and corn, what else of any good has come out of there ?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,476

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    Jobs, Jobs, Jobs!

    But supporters -- including some in the president's own party -- have downplayed the environment impact and stressed the economic benefits the pipeline could bring. The pipeline is backed by the unions, and has been heavily promoted by Canadian officials. In Heineman's letter, the governor said construction in Nebraska would yield $418 million in economic benefits.

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...#ixzz2IkhrKvSZ
    Temporary jobs mostly...


    The U.S. State Department calculated last year that the underground pipeline would add 5,000 to 6,000 U.S. jobs. One independent review of Keystone puts that number even lower, with the Cornell University Global Labor Institute finding that the pipeline would add only 500 to 1,400 temporary construction jobs. The authors of the September report also said that much of the new employment stemming from Keystone would be outside the U.S.

    Transcanada itself cast doubt on its employment forecast when a vice president for the company told CNN last fall that the 20,000 jobs Keystone would create were temporary and that the project would likely yield only "hundreds" of permanent positions.

    Another reason for the discrepancy appears to stem from what that 20,000 figure really means. As Transcanada has conceded, its estimate counted up "job years" spent on the project, not jobs. In other words, the company was counting a single construction worker who worked for two years on Keystone as two jobs, lending fuel to critics who said advocates of the pipeline were overstating its benefits.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_1...ally-at-stake/

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,476

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    Without eminent domain, you'd be walking to work or your drive would be twice as long.

    But more to the point, we're talking about Nebraska here. Nebraska.

    Aside from wheat and corn, what else of any good has come out of there ?
    The pipeline will go through several states. The people of Nebraska were more concerned about the environmental issues because the pipeline was supposed to cross their aquafier.

    The real Eminent Domain battles are happening in Texas

    Landowner Fights Keystone XL Pipeline By Suing the State
    http://stateimpact.npr.org/texas/201...ing-the-state/

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    the NC sandhills
    Posts
    26,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    The people of Nebraska were more concerned about the environmental issues
    I seriously doubt that.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    16,281

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Temporary jobs mostly...


    The U.S. State Department calculated last year that the underground pipeline would add 5,000 to 6,000 U.S. jobs. One independent review of Keystone puts that number even lower, with the Cornell University Global Labor Institute finding that the pipeline would add only 500 to 1,400 temporary construction jobs. The authors of the September report also said that much of the new employment stemming from Keystone would be outside the U.S.

    Transcanada itself cast doubt on its employment forecast when a vice president for the company told CNN last fall that the 20,000 jobs Keystone would create were temporary and that the project would likely yield only "hundreds" of permanent positions.

    Another reason for the discrepancy appears to stem from what that 20,000 figure really means. As Transcanada has conceded, its estimate counted up "job years" spent on the project, not jobs. In other words, the company was counting a single construction worker who worked for two years on Keystone as two jobs, lending fuel to critics who said advocates of the pipeline were overstating its benefits.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_1...ally-at-stake/
    I don't believe antyhing that comes from the Communist Broadcasting System otherwise known as CBS.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    7,449

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SalisburySage View Post
    I don't believe antyhing that comes from the Communist Broadcasting System otherwise known as CBS.
    Because it's not Fox.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,625

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Temporary jobs mostly...


    The U.S. State Department calculated last year that the underground pipeline would add 5,000 to 6,000 U.S. jobs. One independent review of Keystone puts that number even lower, with the Cornell University Global Labor Institute finding that the pipeline would add only 500 to 1,400 temporary construction jobs. The authors of the September report also said that much of the new employment stemming from Keystone would be outside the U.S.

    Transcanada itself cast doubt on its employment forecast when a vice president for the company told CNN last fall that the 20,000 jobs Keystone would create were temporary and that the project would likely yield only "hundreds" of permanent positions.

    Another reason for the discrepancy appears to stem from what that 20,000 figure really means. As Transcanada has conceded, its estimate counted up "job years" spent on the project, not jobs. In other words, the company was counting a single construction worker who worked for two years on Keystone as two jobs, lending fuel to critics who said advocates of the pipeline were overstating its benefits.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_1...ally-at-stake/
    Do you prefer they stay on the government dole?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Arbutus, Md
    Posts
    6,456

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    Without eminent domain, you'd be walking to work or your drive would be twice as long.

    But more to the point, we're talking about Nebraska here. Nebraska.

    Aside from wheat and corn, what else of any good has come out of there ?
    http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2...allala-aquifer

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278