Page 13 of 27 FirstFirst ... 3111213141523 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 260 of 534

Thread: Clinton testifying re Benghazi

  1. #241
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,941

    Default

    Do we know why Brown was at the consulate that day, given the level of dangervwas known?

  2. #242
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monte View Post
    Soulflower's link came from the opinon section of the Post, so that tells part of the story right there.

    Remember that pro-Obama media puff piece when they showed the cam video in the situation room, when Seal Team 6 was coming down on Osama Bin Laden? Oh, how heroic our president looked! If the live Situation Room cam was streaming video at the time of the Benghazi attack, I have little doubt that we would have found the room to have been entirely empty.
    So now the capture of Osama Bin Laden is a "pro-Obama media puff piece", which was a very intensive 'planned' capture of the most wanted murderer of the countries history, and Benghazi was an sudden attack and you are demanding for video from the Situation Room and comparing the two situations?

  3. #243
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,541

    Default

    MEDIA IGNORE HILLARY’S BOMBSHELL BENGHAZI CLAIM
    Secretary insists she did not know about gun-running at U.S. mission

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/media-ign...kZPUFqQQSSa.99

  4. #244
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monte View Post
    This is the Darwin Award winning comment of the week! Congratulations, Soulflower!
    Wasn't the cause of death for Ambassador Stevens smoke inhalation?

  5. #245
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    So now the capture of Osama Bin Laden is a "pro-Obama media puff piece", which was a very intensive 'planned' capture of the most wanted murderer of the countries history, and Benghazi was an sudden attack and you are demanding for video from the Situation Room and comparing the two situations?
    The meeting with the Turkish ambassador was a scheduled meeting at the "Special Mission" and no doubt a very sensitive one. No one knows exactly what was discussed but I'm sure in involved the CIA. I also believe a drone was flying over the area to observed the meeting. Which is why it very likely was there to catch the entire sudden attack.

  6. #246
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    Wasn't the cause of death for Ambassador Stevens smoke inhalation?
    And dying from a fire intentionally set by the terrorists is different than being killed by shrapnel from an exploding bomb?

  7. #247
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    And dying from a fire intentionally set by the terrorists is different than being killed by shrapnel from an exploding bomb?
    Isn't it easier to keep to facts than to speculate?

  8. #248
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    Isn't it easier to keep to facts than to speculate?
    It's easier to have a constructive meaningful discussion with someone who has the facts.

    "As it turned out, only three February 17 Martyrs Brigade members were at the consulate, along with five U.S. security officers. Outmatched, they proved unable to stop scores of militants storming through a gate, firing grenades and using diesel fuel to set fire to the compound.

    Mr. Stevens sought safety in the living quarters, which became engulfed in flames."


    Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...#ixzz2J5aahxiQ
    Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

  9. #249
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    It's easier to have a constructive meaningful discussion with someone who has the facts.

    "As it turned out, only three February 17 Martyrs Brigade members were at the consulate, along with five U.S. security officers. Outmatched, they proved unable to stop scores of militants storming through a gate, firing grenades and using diesel fuel to set fire to the compound.

    Mr. Stevens sought safety in the living quarters, which became engulfed in flames."


    Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...#ixzz2J5aahxiQ
    Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
    And what was the cause of death for Ambassador Stevens?

  10. #250
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    And what was the cause of death for Ambassador Stevens?
    Can you connect the dots? Intentionally set fire with diesel fuel which is known for it's smoky effects due to it's oil base?

  11. #251
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    Can you connect the dots? Intentionally set fire with diesel fuel which is known for it's smoky effects due to it's oil base?
    You as usual are missing the point. Where did I question how the fire started?

  12. #252
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    The meeting with the Turkish ambassador was a scheduled meeting at the "Special Mission" and no doubt a very sensitive one. No one knows exactly what was discussed but I'm sure in involved the CIA. I also believe a drone was flying over the area to observed the meeting. Which is why it very likely was there to catch the entire sudden attack.
    According to the CIA, there was no drone surveillance in the air over Benghazi until an hour or so after the attacks started

  13. #253
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    31,291

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Where was this level of congressional scrutiny when 7 embassies were attacked during the Bush years?

    http://www.allvoices.com/contributed...-benghazi-many
    Bush never lost an ambassador.

  14. #254
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    MEDIA IGNORE HILLARY’S BOMBSHELL BENGHAZI CLAIM
    Secretary insists she did not know about gun-running at U.S. mission

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/media-ign...kZPUFqQQSSa.99
    World Net Daily?

  15. #255
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by veritas View Post
    Bush never lost an ambassador.
    But it's ok that we lost dozens of other State Department employees during his term?

  16. #256
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by veritas
    Bush never lost an ambassador.
    Yeah, he lost 3000+ soldiers in a war for oil instead.

  17. #257
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    31,291

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grindelwald View Post
    Yeah, he lost 3000+ soldiers in a war for oil instead.
    Hardly the subject here is it? Bringing in unrelated matter to divert the discussion does nothing to counter the point previously made. The reason that Bhengazi is getting this scrutiny is twofold, first because it happened at all and second because there was an effort to deflect and cover in the lead up to the election. Hillary passing the buck was hardly reassuring.

  18. #258
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by veritas View Post
    Hardly the subject here is it? Bringing in unrelated matter to divert the discussion does nothing to counter the point previously made. The reason that Bhengazi is getting this scrutiny is twofold, first because it happened at all and second because there was an effort to deflect and cover in the lead up to the election. Hillary passing the buck was hardly reassuring.
    You guys keep repeating this claim despite the overwhelming lack of evidence

    There have been several investigations of the attacks so far. None have supported the idea that there was a coverup of any kind...

  19. #259
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    31,291

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    But it's ok that we lost dozens of other State Department employees during his term?
    It's never OK to lose anyone but you have to look at the circumstances. Leaving our people as sitting ducks in a place like post Khaddafi Libya as the anniversary of 911 approached and after extra security was requested, was the height of irresponsibility.

  20. #260
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by veritas View Post
    Hardly the subject here is it? Bringing in unrelated matter to divert the discussion does nothing to counter the point previously made. The reason that Bhengazi is getting this scrutiny is twofold, first because it happened at all and second because there was an effort to deflect and cover in the lead up to the election. Hillary passing the buck was hardly reassuring.
    Sorry, how is it 'passing the buck' when she has said several times she is responsible?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278