Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 125

Thread: Women in combat

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    I agree if the physical standards are not lowered and the same for everyone.
    Is it true that not all men who meet the physical standards are able to perform all jobs?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    6,085

    Default

    A tribute to Navy Lt. Kara Spears (Revlon) Hultgreen. Was she pushed to hard for political reasons? If women want to join the combat ranks then expect no less neither no more than the male combatants. Train without prejudice or favoritism.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLLqtvVXeWM

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4,447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    I'm all for women in the military, but I wouldn't want the average women I met when I served covering my back. This will only last until the first female bodies come back to Dover
    Or worst yet they are prisoners of war and things happen.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang View Post
    Or worst yet they are prisoners of war and things happen.
    I suppose you haven't been keeping up with the news lately.

    http://news.yahoo.com/house-committe...070120127.html

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    They at least should be required to pass the same physical training standards as men without lowering the standards.
    There should be a minimum standard as they have now, because not all males that past that are able to completely perform all duties either.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4,447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    I suppose you haven't been keeping up with the news lately.

    http://news.yahoo.com/house-committe...070120127.html
    You've completely missed the point and didn't address the actual topic. No surprise though.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    There should be a minimum standard as they have now, because not all males that past that are able to completely perform all duties either.
    They have two standards now, one for men and one for women. The lower standards they have now for women should be abolished and they should be held to the same standards as men. And yes, there are men who don't meet those standards.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang View Post
    You've completely missed the point and didn't address the actual topic. No surprise though.
    Actually you missed the entire point, you brought up the fact that women could become POW's and 'worse' things could happen to them, not a stretch to understand what that meant.

    No surprise here that you hit that piņata first, and forgot what might come tumbling out.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cprenegade View Post
    If someone goes through the physical training and passes, why shouldn't they be considered for combat?
    Women don't have the same physical requirements that men do. That'll make them a liability

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    They have two standards now, one for men and one for women. The lower standards they have now for women should be abolished and they should be held to the same standards as men. And yes, there are men who don't meet those standards.
    Can all men do all physical intensive duties in the military?

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    They have two standards now, one for men and one for women. The lower standards they have now for women should be abolished and they should be held to the same standards as men. And yes, there are men who don't meet those standards.
    And when I was in those men were sent packing

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts
    22,402

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    They at least should be required to pass the same physical training standards as men without lowering the standards.
    That's not likely. NPR already had some professor of woman's studies type on explaining how those standards are sexist and need to be redefined in order to promote the inclusion of women as combatants. Apparantly the present standards were deliberately designed by a male dominated society to ensure that only men were wrothy of being cannon fodder. The word wil go out that the military is to get with the program and make a glowing success of it, no matter what.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    Can all men do all physical intensive duties in the military?
    See kens post.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    5,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    And when I was in those men were sent packing
    Same here, sent to a different MOS.

    The typing / cooking classes sure did fill up at times...

    (thats a joke folks)

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts
    22,402

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    Can all men do all physical intensive duties in the military?
    No. Those who can't usually know better than to join the infantry, or else they foolishly end up... Well, those of us who have been there know very well how they end up. We've seen it too often to think it funny anymore. It was a sad fact of life when I was in, a lot of NFGs never reached the 90 day mark. But that was back in the days when they burned up good people like they were so much kindling. Maybe it will be different now. Maybe.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bullmikey View Post
    No. Those who can't usually know better than to join the infantry, or else they foolishly end up... Well, those of us who have been there know very well how they end up. We've seen it too often to think it funny anymore. It was a sad fact of life when I was in, a lot of NFGs never reached the 90 day mark. But that was back in the days when they burned up good people like they were so much kindling. Maybe it will be different now. Maybe.
    That was not my question. My question was that after completing basic training, are there duties that those completing basic training that physically they are unable to complete?

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    986

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    That was not my question. My question was that after completing basic training, are there duties that those completing basic training that physically they are unable to complete?
    Sure. Not every male who finishes basic will be able to thrive in the Infantry for example. Some will be assigned as 11B, but if they cannot keep up they won't advance in rank at the same pace as those who do, and at the end of their committment will either have to get out or find a more suitable MOS.

    And, of course, not all good Infantrymen can be Rangers or SOF.

    The Corps recently tried an experiment allowing 4 female LTs to attempt some sort of Infantry training. I'll try to find a link, but IIRC, none made it through.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts
    22,402

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by songfourone View Post
    That was not my question. My question was that after completing basic training, are there duties that those completing basic training that physically they are unable to complete?
    Yes, of course, both physically and mentally.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    986

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Harford County
    Posts
    11,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grindelwald View Post
    F progress and F women! Gotta love conservatives.
    War is hell and the last thing we should want are US female POWs. This is progress? While I love liberals... I'll never understand their warped way of thinking.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278