http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...d5b_story.html
As well as Krauthhammer.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...d5b_story.html
As well as Krauthhammer.
And Rich Lowery
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20...ht_about_obama
There should have been something for everyone in President Barack Obama’s second inaugural address. For liberals, a full-throated call to arms. For conservatives, vindication.
Obama settled once and for all the debate over his place on the political spectrum and his political designs. He’s an unabashed liberal determined to shift our politics and our country irrevocably to the left. In other words, Obama’s foes — if you put aside the birthers and sundry other lunatics — always had him pegged correctly.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/0...#ixzz2IxI15Qig
For all of the ideological ambition of his second inaugural, the policy agenda was thin or unachievable. Reducing wait-times at the polls isn’t a major item. At the federal level, gay marriage is largely up to the courts. He will get much less on guns than he wants and probably nothing significant from Congress on climate change. His best chance for a breakthrough is on immigration, which divides Republicans.
The virtue of the address was making his intentions unmistakable, although Rush Limbaugh never mistook them in the first place.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/0...#ixzz2IxItCSN7
We knew all along, and he's just getting started. Fortunately people are waking up to who Obama really is.
Even Chris Christie has seen the light'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...6pLid%3D261429“Instead of trying to bring people together it was a manifesto for, ‘Hey, it’s my way or the highway,’” Christie said this week during an interview on NJ 101.5's monthly "Ask the Governor" program. “We’re going to see how he acts moving forward.”
Christie is not the only conservative who has accused Obama of being overly partisan with his address, which was widely regarded as an unapologetic defense of liberal policies. Earlier this week, Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio) claimed that the president's rhetoric was proof that he was on a mission to "annihilate the Republican Party." Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) had a similarly bleak take, declaring that Obama's words showed he was seeking to usher in an "era of liberalism" that would lead to continued divisions in Washington.
Oh, the horror -- after years of claiming that President Obama was an unrepentant socialist bent upon the total destruction of the American economy, the Republicans have discovered that Obama is . . . wait for it . . . a liberal.
How can we go on?
In the rwnj alternative betaverse, of which SS is a founding member, "liberal" is code for "evil".
...and all the other rwnjs agree.
I am in good company of imortant and respected journalists. Spin all you want Obama has come out of his liberal socialist closet. And believe it or not its the media, his media that is shocked. We knew all along who he was. So give you wise crack to the Media. The great uniter is really Khengis Khan.
But is he elite...that is the true question. I think in the last few games, the answer is yes!
Oops! We aren't talking football here.
Labels are silly, aren't they? Just like the "elite" label in football, the labeling in politics come from lazy people with weak minds. The ones that tune in are regularly are even weaker.
Limbaugh is full of labels and calling someone conservative or liberal really means nothing, except that...the person doing the labeling does so because he is lazy and losing the argument otherwise. Anyone who can articulate his position well can do so without labels or insults aimed at the other side.
Lyberals are not evil.
They do the things they do because they don't know any better. Since the lyberals' level of maturity and reasoned decision making stops growing at the kindergarten level, it just makes them just too plain stupid, moronic, idiotic and narcissistic to realize the consequences that their actions have on other human beings.
For example, after insane members of the cult of islam flew planes into building, murdering thousands of innocent Americans, for a while, the lyberals were just a little patriotic.
Then, after Congress backed President Bush and troops were sent to Iraq, they started with their "We Support The Troops But Not The War" whimpering. This was their way of saying they hated the Republican President but they were doing it in what they thought was a sneaky backdoor way. This is the way a lot of lyberals live their lives.
The troops laughed at them because only a coward would join the military and not be ready to fight, and perhaps die, in battle and troops know what to do with cowards like that Manning girl. This is why lyberals love Jean Francois Kerry.
So, you see, lyberals are like permanent little kindergarteners. I just want to let you kids know that, when the fecal matter hits the fan, you can hide behind Men like me while we take care of the dirty work. Just be ready to cook us some good meals and do our laundry in return.
Now put down the bongs and get back to your coloring books.
The reason that Obama was ever elected in his first term, was Bush/Chenney, pure and simple.
Bush/Chenney was so arrogant and unwilling to listen to the majority of the American people, that the electorate lashed out and put Obama in office.
I remember a press conference late in the second term for George W. Bush. A reporter asked him if he could recall any mistakes that he had made while in office and Bush replied that none came to mind. Really.
Obama is a progressive Dem. Oh the horror!![]()
What is UNBELIEVABLE is that in 2007 I watched the MEDIA actually elect him and ordain him when all I heard was "change" and a lot Platitudes spewing forth with no substance. Then I started investigating. I was right then and I am right now. He has so much crap hidden it's downright ridiculous.
This was all set up from the beginning. But the OBAMTRONS won't find out until it's too late. Very Sad!
Last edited by Virginia Poe; 01-25-2013 at 08:43 AM.
Obama is a neo-socialist in Democratic clothing!
He walks on water to some here but he's still a very much, to the left Autocrat.
A left or right politician would negotiate...I've seen no indication he's willing to do so.
|
| Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv | Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278 |