I give God 10%. Why do you get 18?

[NCBirdfan]

I think a receipt, which contains information of a financial nature and which may contain personal information about a customer, would be considered to require more privacy than the buildings or interior furnishings. Also, the issue was that an employee posted the information, not a customer.

I think it would have been OK to do so by etching out the name and signature, etc. But a receipt has no special protections beyond that IMO.

[kudzu]

I think a receipt, which contains information of a financial nature and which may contain personal information about a customer, would be considered to require more privacy than the buildings or interior furnishings. Also, the issue was that an employee posted the information, not a customer.

This particular receipt contained ZERO personal information until the dumbarse (female) "pastor" signed their name to it.

Along with the insipid, stupid, totally unnecessary rude comment on the receipt.

Thank you.

I'm sorry, you were saying ?