Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 51 of 51

Thread: Clinton: "Benghazi critics don't live in an evidence-based world"

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by veritas View Post
    Yes, and the evidence all leads to the conclusion that the administration inadequately protected our ambassador. Otherwise, he'd still be alive. I bet that "leaves a mark" on his family and the families of the others killed.
    Blah. . blah. . .blah.

    Yer a hack, veritas.

    And ya do not nor have ya ever lived in an evidence-based world.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    We have no idea who they are. Probably will never know.
    Why are the names being kept a secret? Investigative journalists are looking and will eventually dig up their names. It's what they do.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    31,330

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    Blah. . blah. . .blah.

    Yer a hack, veritas.

    And ya do not nor have ya ever lived in an evidence-based world.
    Great comeback. No evidence, no facts, no nothing except a personal attack. Thanks for showing that ideology will always trump truth for the left. Of course, we've known this for a long, long time already.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,412

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    Why are the names being kept a secret? Investigative journalists are looking and will eventually dig up their names. It's what they do.
    You're suggesting that someone "out" the names of people involved in a covert op?

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    You're suggesting that someone "out" the names of people involved in a covert op?
    First, these are state department personnel. Two, there is a reason why the names are being withheld. And three, as you clearly stated, the operation is out of the bag so there is nothing to hide there. So that just leaves one thing left. The WH and the State Department are up to their necks in something that would clearly hurt them politically.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,588

    Default

    This news article is dated 1 February, 2013. Investigative reporters want to know who those 5 State Department Security Agents are.

    "Before the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, the department undertook a calculated effort to publicize the agents’ names and faces--presenting them in a State Department promotional magazine posted on the Internet. After the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attacks, the State Department has treated the names and faces of the DS agents who survived those attacks as if they were classified information."

    "This remarkable about-face raises two questions: Why can’t the American people know the names--and hear the stories--of the heroic DS agents who fought the terrorists who attacked our mission in Benghazi? Why can’t these courageous survivors deliver their eyewitnesses accounts directly to the U.S. Congress?"

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/stat...112-suppressed

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    This news article is dated 1 February, 2013. Investigative reporters want to know who those 5 State Department Security Agents are.

    "Before the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, the department undertook a calculated effort to publicize the agents’ names and faces--presenting them in a State Department promotional magazine posted on the Internet. After the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attacks, the State Department has treated the names and faces of the DS agents who survived those attacks as if they were classified information."

    "This remarkable about-face raises two questions: Why can’t the American people know the names--and hear the stories--of the heroic DS agents who fought the terrorists who attacked our mission in Benghazi? Why can’t these courageous survivors deliver their eyewitnesses accounts directly to the U.S. Congress?"

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/stat...112-suppressed
    Here we go again....the Brent Bozell owned CNSnews. The only way you can get further right than old Brent is to fall off the cliff.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,249

    Default

    What part are we not getting with the RWNJ's, they will never give up until they think they have Clinton's head on a stick. She is such a freaking huge candidate for 2016 and they know it. Like Faux News, doesn't matter if it is real or true, they will ignore anything that resembles a positive for the administration. Just look at the last few hearings, Benghazi, gun violence and Hagel, the RWNJ's keep doubling down on stupidity.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Creekman View Post
    Here we go again....the Brent Bozell owned CNSnews. The only way you can get further right than old Brent is to fall off the cliff.
    What's important here is the questions this news agency is asking which is also being asked by Congress. They smell a deep dark secret intentionally being kept hidden from even Congress. If, as Clinton stated, the State Department was not involved in any CIA operation of running guns then why not give up the names of the 5 State Department Agents? This won't go away until those agents come out from where they are being hidden and questioned.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    What's important here is the questions this news agency is asking which is also being asked by Congress. They smell a deep dark secret intentionally being kept hidden from even Congress. If, as Clinton stated, the State Department was not involved in any CIA operation of running guns then why not give up the names of the 5 State Department Agents? This won't go away until those agents come out from where they are being hidden and questioned.
    That's your's and Brent's story. Lets see how it plays out. As you may or may not know not all State Dept.employees are State Dept. employees.

  11. #51
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,588

    Default

    I'm willing to guess the state department was involved with the CIA stealing Libyan weapons and passing them to Turkey via the Ambassador without Libya's knowledge. They got caught with their pants down by the same militia/terrorists groups that fought against Khadaffi and his regime and believed those weapons rightfully belonged to them. Which is also why Libya is lifting not one finger to help bring the attackers to American justice. Clinton and Obama screwed up big time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278