Page 15 of 15 FirstFirst ... 5131415
Results 281 to 296 of 296

Thread: The vast left-wing conspiracy

  1. #281
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SoSad View Post
    I thought Byng's argument was that Stevens was helping the CIA sell arms.

    Either Stevens knew or he didn't know. The book says he probabaly knew nothing.

    I'd also like to know if Obama knew anything about this since he said he was against the sale of weapons to Syria.
    That's what Obama has the CIA (Brennan) for. Secret operations that gives him deniability. A good reason to hide the names of the survivors of Benghazi from the media.

  2. #282
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SoSad View Post
    I thought Byng's argument was that Stevens was helping the CIA sell arms.

    Either Stevens knew or he didn't know. The book says he probabaly knew nothing.

    I'd also like to know if Obama knew anything about this since he said he was against the sale of weapons to Syria.
    Didn't you even read your own right wing link??

    "Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta has revealed that he and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin E. Dempsey originally backed a plan to send weapons to rebels fighting to overthrow President Bashar Assad in Syria - but the White House blocked it.

    The revelation Thursday, which exposes a previously unknown rift within the Obama administration over policy toward Syria’s bloody and nearly two-year-old civil war, came during Senate testimony focusing on the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya."

  3. #283
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    Didn't you even read your own right wing link??

    "Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta has revealed that he and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin E. Dempsey originally backed a plan to send weapons to rebels fighting to overthrow President Bashar Assad in Syria - but the White House blocked it.

    The revelation Thursday, which exposes a previously unknown rift within the Obama administration over policy toward Syria’s bloody and nearly two-year-old civil war, came during Senate testimony focusing on the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya."
    SoSad is talking about Byng's theory on why Stevens met with the Turkish ambassador on the same day the attacks took place. They were probably discussing the transfer of Libyan SAM-7 weapons to Syria. Do you always believe everything the WH says? Dirty unpopular jobs are left to the CIA. Brennan is one shady character. Water boarding, and a secret drone weapon he ran. This is Obama's pick for CIA Director too.

  4. #284
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    That's what Obama has the CIA (Brennan) for. Secret operations that gives him deniability. A good reason to hide the names of the survivors of Benghazi from the media.
    If Brennan is the guy who is responsible for all types of underhanded stuff, why would Obama nominate him for a high profile job where everything he does is under scrutiny from Congress?

  5. #285
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SoSad View Post
    I thought Byng's argument was that Stevens was helping the CIA sell arms.

    Either Stevens knew or he didn't know. The book says he probabaly knew nothing.

    I'd also like to know if Obama knew anything about this since he said he was against the sale of weapons to Syria.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    Didn't you even read your own right wing link??

    "Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta has revealed that he and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin E. Dempsey originally backed a plan to send weapons to rebels fighting to overthrow President Bashar Assad in Syria - but the White House blocked it.

    The revelation Thursday, which exposes a previously unknown rift within the Obama administration over policy toward Syria’s bloody and nearly two-year-old civil war, came during Senate testimony focusing on the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya."
    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    SoSad is talking about Byng's theory on why Stevens met with the Turkish ambassador on the same day the attacks took place. They were probably discussing the transfer of Libyan SAM-7 weapons to Syria. Do you always believe everything the WH says? Dirty unpopular jobs are left to the CIA. Brennan is one shady character. Water boarding, and a secret drone weapon he ran. This is Obama's pick for CIA Director too.
    I am addressing this:

    Quote Originally Posted by SoSad
    I'd also like to know if Obama knew about this since he said he was against the sale of weapons to Syria.
    Then gives this link:

    Panetta reveals rejected Pentagon plan to send weapons to rebels in push to oust Assad

    Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta has revealed that he and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin E. Dempsey originally backed a plan to send weapons to rebels fighting to overthrow President Bashar Assad in Syria - but the White House blocked it.

  6. #286
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    If Brennan is the guy who is responsible for all types of underhanded stuff, why would Obama nominate him for a high profile job where everything he does is under scrutiny from Congress?
    Yes, why exactly is Brennan being rewarded with the CIA Directorship? A guy who has been with the CIA forever, yet up until now, has always played second fiddle to lesser qualified candidates such as Petraeus?

  7. #287
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    I am addressing this:



    Then gives this link:
    I'd like to hear from Brennan since it seems the CIA was heavily involved with the Benghazi attacks. But I won't hold my breath waiting to hear the truth.

  8. #288
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    I'd like to hear from Brennan since it seems the CIA was heavily involved with the Benghazi attacks. But I won't hold my breath waiting to hear the truth.
    Are you waiting for Brennan to call you?

    I agree that you shouldn't hold your breath.

  9. #289
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    Are you waiting for Brennan to call you?

    I agree that you shouldn't hold your breath.
    Investigative reporters took Nixon down. They won't stop looking for evidence that the WH is heavily involved in CIA operations. Seems money and fame brings out the narcissist in many of our secret black ops warriors who know some dark secrets. Osama's shooter is just dying to come out and tell his story.

  10. #290
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    Investigative reporters took Nixon down.
    Have FOXNews get their crack investigative team right on it.

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy
    They won't stop looking for evidence that the WH is heavily involved in CIA operations.
    The White House had better be heavily involved in CIA operations.

    You do understand that the CIA is an executive agency?

    And that the White House is the office of the EXECUTIVE??

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy
    Seems money and fame brings out the narcissist in many of our secret black ops warriors who know some dark secrets. Osama's shooter is just dying to come out and tell his story.
    Sheet happens.

  11. #291
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,566

    Default

    The White House had better be heavily involved in CIA operations.

    You do understand that the CIA is an executive agency?

    And that the White House is the office of the EXECUTIVE?? Cameron

    Obama's right hand secret black ops wing. Seems everyone but Obama knows what they are up to. Now why is that?

  12. #292
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,566

    Default

    "Sheet happens." Creekman

    That fact does not bode well for Obama.

  13. #293
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    12,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    Didn't you even read your own right wing link??

    "Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta has revealed that he and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin E. Dempsey originally backed a plan to send weapons to rebels fighting to overthrow President Bashar Assad in Syria - but the White House blocked it.

    The revelation Thursday, which exposes a previously unknown rift within the Obama administration over policy toward Syria’s bloody and nearly two-year-old civil war, came during Senate testimony focusing on the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya."
    Yes, I read the links I post. Why wouldn't I? You are the one that dismissed it twice yet use it as an example.

    I purposely posted a link that was showing that the Obama administration knew about and blocked the sales of arms to question Byng's theory.

  14. #294
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    12,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    SoSad is talking about Byng's theory on why Stevens met with the Turkish ambassador on the same day the attacks took place. They were probably discussing the transfer of Libyan SAM-7 weapons to Syria. Do you always believe everything the WH says? Dirty unpopular jobs are left to the CIA. Brennan is one shady character. Water boarding, and a secret drone weapon he ran. This is Obama's pick for CIA Director too.
    This is exactly my point.

  15. #295
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    12,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    If Brennan is the guy who is responsible for all types of underhanded stuff, why would Obama nominate him for a high profile job where everything he does is under scrutiny from Congress?
    He may be a very effective scapegoat. It's hard to say why Obama is moving in this direction. The truth is, none of us know including those that feel that Obama does no worng.

  16. #296
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SoSad View Post
    He may be a very effective scapegoat. It's hard to say why Obama is moving in this direction. The truth is, none of us know including those that feel that Obama does no worng.
    Birds of a feather, SoSad. We are known by the company we keep.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278