Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: Terrible play calling at end of game for 49er's

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    316

    Default Terrible play calling at end of game for 49er's

    I can't believe with such a great quarterback they did not try to use him to run the ball for a touchdown. I thought the last 4 plays were terrible. Also all that bull about the lights going out changed the game, maybe they just started to play better. You have to give our defense alot of credit, when we needed to stop them we did. Just a great win for Baltimore, I really thought they were going to carry Ray off the field.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,377

    Default

    Watch the replay and notice how the Ravens were stacking against the run and coming up with run blitzes on all four downs.

    They dared the 49ers to pass...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    24,817

    Default

    That final 4th-down incompletion at the end, where there was the non-call on a holding penalty, looked to be uncatchable in-bounds. Didn't hear any commentators mentioning it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,377

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by regularguy View Post
    That final 4th-down incompletion at the end, where there was the non-call on a holding penalty, looked to be uncatchable in-bounds. Didn't hear any commentators mentioning it.
    The Refs are almost never going to throw a flag on a play in the last two minutes of a playoff game (and certainly not in the Super Bowl).

    Remember that in last year's AFC Championship and just before the missed Cundiff FG, Pitta was blatantly held at the goal line, and it was not called.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    495

    Default

    that was a blatant hold by jimmy smith and shouldve been called. you guys would be livid if roles were reversed

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,402

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yeah View Post
    that was a blatant hold by jimmy smith and shouldve been called. you guys would be livid if roles were reversed
    Maybe you should cry about it?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yeah View Post
    that was a blatant hold by jimmy smith and shouldve been called. you guys would be livid if roles were reversed
    Maybe, maybe not. You can contact the receiver for 5 yards. The play started at the 5. The continued contact carried into the end zone, and both players had their hands on each other, so it's not nearly as obvious or simple as you're making it out to be. Plus, there were plenty of calls that should have gone in the Ravens favor that didn't. (the late hit on Joe out of bounds, PI on Smith all night long, etc). So in the end, it all balanced out.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Posts
    8,995

    Default

    There was a pass play where either T. Smith or Q was being held at least 12 yards beyond the LOS and no call was made. The refs called little the entire game and were consistent with the calls they did make. Akers took a dive on the missed field goal but the ref's angle wasn't good to see that. The roughing call on Ngata was fair since he took 2 steps after Kaopectate released the pass.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    15,231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yeah View Post
    that was a blatant hold by jimmy smith and shouldve been called. you guys would be livid if roles were reversed
    yes it was a hold.
    The ball was also 5-6 feet out of bounds, and Crabtree wouldn't have been in position to catch it and keep his feet in.

    No one is talking about that. THAT is the real reason for the no-call.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yeah View Post
    that was a blatant hold by jimmy smith and shouldve been called. you guys would be livid if roles were reversed
    oh really,

    so tell me why wasn't the late hit way out of bounds on Flacco not called ?

    and the running into the kicker call on Akers missed FG
    everybody on ESPN stated the same thing I saw...Akers was not touched

    even Steve Young laughed at that call

    care to comment

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Far from home View Post
    yes it was a hold.
    The ball was also 5-6 feet out of bounds, and Crabtree wouldn't have been in position to catch it and keep his feet in.

    No one is talking about that. THAT is the real reason for the no-call.
    you mean Crabtree alias Stretch Armstrong

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tax Hell, MD
    Posts
    18,079

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yeah View Post
    that was a blatant hold by jimmy smith and shouldve been called. you guys would be livid if roles were reversed
    If you look more closely at the replay, you'll also see Crabtree pushing off Smith that wasn't called either.

    PS: The Ravens HAVE been in that same role more times than anyone can count.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,608

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Passarino View Post
    There was a pass play where either T. Smith or Q was being held at least 12 yards beyond the LOS and no call was made. The refs called little the entire game and were consistent with the calls they did make. Akers took a dive on the missed field goal but the ref's angle wasn't good to see that. The roughing call on Ngata was fair since he took 2 steps after Kaopectate released the pass.
    It was Torrey and he was being held way beyond 5 yards. If they don't call that one, at least they were consistent in not calling this one. And the ball was uncatchable and both players were pushing off.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,416

    Default

    Only a moron would think that ball could have been caught in bounds.

    Quote Originally Posted by yeah View Post
    that was a blatant hold by jimmy smith and shouldve been called. you guys would be livid if roles were reversed

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Posts
    8,995

    Default

    The pass being catchable doesn't apply to a holding call though. Holding is before the ball is in the air.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the "dena"
    Posts
    13,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Passarino View Post
    The pass being catchable doesn't apply to a holding call though. Holding is before the ball is in the air.
    It may have been holding, but it wasn't called

    my point is more.....
    A. you cannot single this call out...sometimes it's made sometimes it's not
    B. how about the late hit out of bounds on Flacco NO CALL ? it would have given the Ravens a 1st down
    C. and the BS running into the kicker call ? that call was horrible....take 3 points off the score for the 49ers

    If you were to listen to Jim "Classless" Harbaugh, Frank Gore, Brooks and most of the 49er fan base.....

    it's why they lost

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Posts
    8,995

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by durango46 View Post
    It may have been holding, but it wasn't called

    my point is more.....
    A. you cannot single this call out...sometimes it's made sometimes it's not
    B. how about the late hit out of bounds on Flacco NO CALL ? it would have given the Ravens a 1st down
    C. and the BS running into the kicker call ? that call was horrible....take 3 points off the score for the 49ers

    If you were to listen to Jim "Classless" Harbaugh, Frank Gore, Brooks and most of the 49er fan base.....

    it's why they lost
    Hey, I agree with you. The refs were very consistent on not calling holding all night.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4,210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yeah View Post
    that was a blatant hold by jimmy smith and shouldve been called. you guys would be livid if roles were reversed
    Torrey Smith was being raped by the 49ers secondary all game. The refs were letting them play. Besides, Crabtree initiated contact. It was a great non-call.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Posts
    8,995

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang View Post
    Torrey Smith was being raped by the 49ers secondary all game. The refs were letting them play. Besides, Crabtree initiated contact. It was a great non-call.
    That play looked a lot like the Philly game with Jacoby Jones in the endzone. The flag was thrown on that play - against Jones!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Baltiless
    Posts
    7,534

    Default

    In a Week 9 game, or maybe even in the first quarter of that game, that probably gets a flag.

    Not in the last minute of the Super Bowl though. Good no-call.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278