NRA Supported Universal Background Checks After Columbine Massacre

[SemiAuto]

Then you aren't getting my point at all. I'm not focused on the fact that the round is armor piercing. I'm talking about the intent behind it's manufacture. One just so happens to be armor piercing because it has to be that way in order to take down certain animals. The other is intentionally made to be armor piercing because it's intended use is to puncture body armor.

Yet when it comes to hunting rifles and police vests the intent does not matter. So when people say things like, "Hunters don't need armor piercing rounds that can shoot through police vests." they don't know what the hell they're talking about. They're completely missing the fact that a typical deer hunting rifle would be firing armor piercing rounds in regards to the body armor that police officers wear. It is either ignorance or a dishonest bait and switch.

The fact is that a typical deer hunting rifle will be armor piercing to your typical police body armor whether it is intended to be or not.

[Grindelwald]

Chris Wallace of Fox News really handed it to LolPierre the other day. Even Fox News knows what scumbags the NRA consists of. Love it.

[The Astute Reader(tm)]

Then you aren't getting my point at all. I'm not focused on the fact that the round is armor piercing. I'm talking about the intent behind it's manufacture. One just so happens to be armor piercing because it has to be that way in order to take down certain animals. The other is intentionally made to be armor piercing because it's intended use is to puncture body armor.

Right. And another charactersitic of the 'other' round is that it does not exist.