Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 42

Thread: Mike Pereira: Refs come through with tough non-call

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Posts
    8,995

    Default Mike Pereira: Refs come through with tough non-call

    By the way, it couldn't be defensive holding because the pass was in the air when the contact occurred. It's either offensive pass interference or defensive pass interference.

    It was not an obvious foul and until I looked at it in slow motion, it seemed like no foul at all. It's not a penalty I would want called if I were still VP of Officiating for the NFL.


    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/m...al-play-020313

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    BALCO
    Posts
    21,657

    Default

    IMO most would agree with this as the officials from kickoff let the guys play

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Interesting that this expert, while stating that it could only have been offensive or defensive PI since the ball was in the air, made no mention whatsoever that the pass was un-catchable.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,885

    Default

    Somebody should tell the folks at ESPN that it wasn't a hold, since it seems to be the network's stand that it was a hold and the 49ers were robbed.

    ESPN's take on just about every show: Congrats to Baltimore, but...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    9,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NCBirdfan View Post
    Somebody should tell the folks at ESPN that it wasn't a hold, since it seems to be the network's stand that it was a hold and the 49ers were robbed.

    ESPN's take on just about every show: Congrats to Baltimore, but...
    ESPN needs a way to explain why most of their "experts" were wrong about Denver, New England and San Francisco.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,388

    Default

    Super Bowl 2013: Falcons fans react on Twitter to familiar no-call

    http://www.thefalcoholic.com/2013/2/...s-interference
    Great link.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    21224
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Passarino View Post
    By the way, it couldn't be defensive holding because the pass was in the air when the contact occurred. It's either offensive pass interference or defensive pass interference.

    It was not an obvious foul and until I looked at it in slow motion, it seemed like no foul at all. It's not a penalty I would want called if I were still VP of Officiating for the NFL.


    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/m...al-play-020313
    Pereira wouldn't find fault with a ref failing to flag someone who shot someone on the field.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Posts
    8,995

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    Interesting that this expert, while stating that it could only have been offensive or defensive PI since the ball was in the air, made no mention whatsoever that the pass was un-catchable.
    I think he was just answering Jim Harbaugh's screaming and running around giving the holding signal.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    downtown
    Posts
    700

    Default

    Crabtree ran the wrong route, thus running into the db. It was the right call not to throw a flag.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Passarino View Post
    I think he was just answering Jim Harbaugh's screaming and running around giving the holding signal.
    He was analyzing the play. He specifically stated it wasn't holding because the ball was already in the air, making it w question of PI or not. Once he said that, he needed to address the fact that that ball was not catchable, because that's a major element in whether or not to call PI.

    Then you get THIS clown, who doesn't even know that contact IS allowed for 5 yards:

    http://video.nbcsports.msnbc.com/nbc...99021#50699021

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Baltiless
    Posts
    7,534

    Default

    I thought it was one of the best officiated games I've ever seen. The officials stepped up in the spotlight.

    The best officiated games are the ones where the officials aren't overly visible.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OriginalColtsFan View Post
    He was analyzing the play. He specifically stated it wasn't holding because the ball was already in the air, making it w question of PI or not. Once he said that, he needed to address the fact that that ball was not catchable, because that's a major element in whether or not to call PI.

    Then you get THIS clown, who doesn't even know that contact IS allowed for 5 yards:

    http://video.nbcsports.msnbc.com/nbc...99021#50699021
    Man, there was a lot of whining in that video.

    Also, they blather on about Cary Williams shoving the official. They never mention Bruce Miller shoving an official in the same scrum. Scroll down to the actual video, and take a look at about the 2 second mark:
    http://www.buzzfeed.com/ktlincoln/a-...f-during-the-s

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    16,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LarryN View Post
    Man, there was a lot of whining in that video.
    A lot of whining, and everything was anti-Raven. NO mention of:

    1. The hit on Flacco out of bounds.
    2. The NON HIT on Aikers that cost the Ravens 3 precious points.
    3. The holding all night long on Smith

    It was so lopsided it wasn't even funny.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    21224
    Posts
    158

    Default

    right. the good 'non-call' where Williams shoved the ref.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by infinite looper View Post
    right. the good 'non-call' where Williams shoved the ref.
    Williams probably should have been tossed. Do you agree that Bruce Miller should have been tossed as well? I wonder why the idiots calling for Williams ejection aren't mentioning Miller....

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    21224
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Williams had to be tossed for striking a ref. Everything else is subjective, to be honest.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by infinite looper View Post
    Williams had to be tossed for striking a ref. Everything else is subjective, to be honest.
    What about Bruce Miller?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    7,885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by infinite looper View Post
    right. the good 'non-call' where Williams shoved the ref.
    That same ref was shoved by Cam Newton during the regular season and didn't eject him either. It's up to the ref to determine the situation - whether it was accidental or not. In both cases, he obviously thought it was indeed accidental.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn, NYC (my heart will always be in Arlington, Va)
    Posts
    15,447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skeemer View Post
    I thought it was one of the best officiated games I've ever seen. The officials stepped up in the spotlight.

    The best officiated games are the ones where the officials aren't overly visible.
    It was one of the worst to most people. The pass interference no-call, the offsides on Ed Reed no-call and the pass interference no-call on a long pass were are horrible no-calls. They all greatly affected the game as well.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    15,775

    Default

    There are two ways to look at the Super Bowl officating:

    1.) It was good, in that they let them play
    2.) It was bad all around with no-calls or bad calls affecting both sides

    If Williams should have been tossed, Miller should have been tossed. If Jimmy Smith is called for holding Crabtree, all of the holding of Torrey Smith should have been called. The late hit on Flacco should have been called. The (non)"hit" on the flopping kicker should not have been called.

    You can't pick out one call and get all upset about it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278